Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

HiDeep Inc.

Technology area: Communications

6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 30 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

HiDeep Inc. is currently managing 4 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. This portfolio of 4 pending actions indicates an active effort to secure patent rights for its communications innovations. The company's focus on the Communications sector is the main driver of its current patent prosecution activity, reflecting its commitment to protecting its technological designs in a competitive market.

The applications are being reviewed by 4 distinct examiners across 4 distinct art units. With 4 pending office actions and 4 distinct examiners, each case is assigned to a different individual at the patent office. The involvement of 4 distinct art units suggests that every one of the 4 pending office actions is being evaluated by a different specialized group, requiring the company to navigate various departmental standards and procedural requirements.

EDUN, MUHAMMAD N is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because the busiest examiner pending count is 1 and there are 4 total pending office actions, the workload is evenly spread among the 4 distinct examiners. This distribution across 4 distinct art units means the company must account for the specific standards and tendencies of four different examiners and departments to advance its 4 total pending office actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (33%)
3
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
§102 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
6
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EDUN, MUHAMMAD N 1 91.5% -4.9%
PATEL, SANJIV D 1 78.1% +3.8%
YANG, NAN-YING 1 77.9% +8.6%
KETEMA, BENYAM 1 65.8% +10.1%
FOX, JOSEPH PATRICK 1 68.6% +14.9%
MANDEVILLE, JASON M 1 55.4% +46.1%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19560363 STYLUS PEN EDUN, MUHAMMAD N —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19220509 ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR KETEMA, BENYAM 40d
18673951 TOUCH INPUT DEVICE MANDEVILLE, JASON M —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19220509 ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR KETEMA, BENYAM 40d
18966207 TOUCH INPUT DEVICE FOX, JOSEPH PATRICK —
18673951 TOUCH INPUT DEVICE MANDEVILLE, JASON M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2629 2
2625 1
2626 1
2622 1
2623 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19560363 STYLUS PEN EDUN, MUHAMMAD N 2629 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 09, 2026
19380028 TOUCH SENSOR AND TOUCH INPUT DEVICE COMPRISING SAME PATEL, SANJIV D 2625 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Nov 05, 2025
19332368 STYLUS PEN, ANTENNA MODULE, TOUCH SENSOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE YANG, NAN-YING 2629 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2025
19220509 ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR KETEMA, BENYAM 2626 §102§103 Final Rejection 40d Pending May 28, 2025
18966207 TOUCH INPUT DEVICE FOX, JOSEPH PATRICK 2622 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 03, 2024
18673951 TOUCH INPUT DEVICE MANDEVILLE, JASON M 2623 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 24, 2024

Managing HiDeep Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month