Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/232,126

COMPACT MOBILE UVC LIGHT PROJECTION UNIT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Priority
Aug 15, 2022 — provisional 63/398,057 +1 more
Examiner
STOFFA, WYATT A
Art Unit
2881
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
UVC Science, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
827 granted / 1041 resolved
+11.4% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
64 currently pending
Career history
1120
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
38.7%
-1.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
§112
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1041 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of invention I in the reply filed on 7/29/26 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 7-9, 28-29, and 31 are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3, 14, 18, 21,and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 214147812 [Suzhou], the translation of which is attached and referenced herein, in view of US 2014/0299793 A1 [Deng]. Regarding Claim 1: Suzhou teaches a UVC light projection unit for providing UVC illumination, said UVC light projection unit comprising: a housing having a front and back, top and bottom and sides (Fig. 1 (1)); a plurality of light sources supported by said housing, said plurality of light sources comprising a first group of light sources comprising a plurality of UVC light emitting diodes (LED) (Fig. 2 (23)) configured to project UVC light and visible light forward; a handle closer to the top of said housing than the bottom or sides, said handle for holding said housing such that said plurality of light sources project light in a forward direction (Fig. 1 (8)); and a fan disposed to provide cooling for said plurality of light sources (Fig. 1 (4)). However, Suzhou fails to teach a second group of light sources supported by said housing comprising a plurality of visible light emitting diodes configured to project visible light forward. Deng teaches a UV light projection unit that includes a housing (Fig. 1 (2)), and a plurality of light sources supported by said housing, said plurality of light sources comprising a first group of light sources comprising a plurality of UVC light emitting diodes (LED) and a second group of light sources comprising a plurality of visible light emitting diodes configured to project UVC light and visible light (Fig. 4, para 20) forward (paras 1, 5-6). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to modify Suzhou in light of the teachings of Deng such that the plurality of light sources included UVC LEDs and visible light LEDs. One would have been motivated to do so since this would allow one to selectively illuminate for inspection and disinfect a given target. Deng paras 5-6. Regarding Claim 3: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, wherein both said housing and said handle are elongated along a longitudinal direction. See Suzhou Fig. 1. Regarding Claim 14: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, wherein said housing has a shape of a contoured rectangular prism. Suzhou Fig. 1 (1) is described as a “rectangular box structure,” which is understood to be the same as a contoured rectangular prism. Regarding Claim 18: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, wherein said fan is in the back of said housing. Suzhou fan (4) is “arranged on one side of the metal radiator 3, which is far away from the ultraviolet light-emitting unit.” Regarding Claim 21: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, wherein said front and back have rectangular or square profiles. As shown in Suzhou Fig. 2, also note Suzhou Fig. 1 (1) is described as a “rectangular box structure.” Regarding Claim 25: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, wherein said sides have rectangular profiles. As shown in Suzhou Fig. 2, also note Suzhou Fig. 1 (1) is described as a “rectangular box structure.” Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 214147812 [Suzhou], the translation of which is attached and referenced herein, in view of US 2014/0299793 A1 [Deng] as applied above, and further in view of US 2014/0183377 A1 [Bettles]. Regarding Claim 17: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, but fails to teach the unit further comprising bladed surfaces or fins on said housing. Bettles teaches a UV light disinfection system (abstract) which adds fins to its housing to better extract heat from its UV LEDs and other electronic components. Para 34. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to add the fins of Bettles to the housing of Suzhou. One would have been motivated to do so since this would improve heat extraction from its UV LEDs and other electronic components. Claims 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 214147812 [Suzhou], the translation of which is attached and referenced herein, in view of US 2014/0299793 A1 [Deng] as applied above, and further in view of US 2012/0026725 A1[Johnson]. Regarding Claim 19: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, but fails to teach that said handles comprise plastic. Johnson teaches a handle for a light projection unit (Fig. 1 (16) comprising plastic and rubber. Para 64. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to use the plastic and rubber handle construction of Johnson in the handle of Suzhou. One would have been motivated to do so since this would provide a light weight and durable handle. Johnson Para 64. Regarding Claim 20: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, but fails to teach that handles includes rubber texturing that enhances grip. Johnson teaches a handle for a light projection unit (Fig. 1 (16) comprising rubber. Para 64. It is noted that any handle made of rubber would have the texturing of rubber. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to use the rubber handle construction of Johnson in the handle of Suzhou. One would have been motivated to do so since this would provide a light weight and durable handle. Johnson Para 64. Claims 22 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over CN 214147812 [Suzhou], the translation of which is attached and referenced herein, in view of US 2014/0299793 A1 [Deng] as applied above, and further in view of US 2015/0328348 A1 [Colayco]. Regarding Claim 22 and 26: The above modified invention teaches the UVC light projection unit of claim 1, but fails to teach said front and back have rounded or beveled corners, and said sides have rounded or beveled corners. Colayco teaches a UV disinfection device (abstract) wherein all the corners are beveled (Fig. 1 (140), para 27. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective time of filing to use the beveled corners of Colayco in the housing of Suzhou. One would have been motivated to do so since this would “enable simplified lifting and carrying of the device” and “provide less of a chance of bumping against traditional corners as in a traditional “cube” or “box” configuration.” Colayco para 27. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 10,166,309 B2 teaches the use of UV and visible light LEDs together. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WYATT A STOFFA whose telephone number is (571)270-1782. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 0700-1600 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ROBERT KIM can be reached at 571 272 2293. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. WYATT STOFFA Primary Examiner Art Unit 2881 /WYATT A STOFFA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2881
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748200
LIGHT SOURCE CHARACTERIZATION SYSTEM
4y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12741043
VEHICLE LAVATORY UV LIGHT SANITIZATION SYSTEM
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738451
Charged Particle Beam Apparatus
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716826
ANALYSIS METHOD
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716571
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR HIGH-EFFICIENTLY TUNING THE WAVELENGTH OF LIGHT USING COLLIMATING MODULE INCLUDING AN AXICON LENS
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+22.8%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1041 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month