Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/233,693

3DSFET DEVICE INCLUDING RESTRUCTURED LOWER SOURCE/DRAIN REGION HAVING INCREASED CONTACT AREA

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 14, 2023
Examiner
KIM, SU C
Art Unit
2899
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
65%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
695 granted / 899 resolved
+9.3% vs TC avg
Minimal -12% lift
Without
With
+-12.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
947
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
57.6%
+17.6% vs TC avg
§102
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
§112
6.5%
-33.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 899 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-17 & 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Chung et al. (US 20220037497). Regarding claim 1, Chung discloses that a three-dimensional field-effect transistor (3DSFET) device comprising: a 1st source/drain region 228DS (Fig. 14A-C); and a 2ⁿᵈ source/drain region 248SD (Fig. 14AC)stacked on the 1st source/drain region, wherein the 1st source/drain region 228SDhas a protrusion at a 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion among a 1st upper corner portion and the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion opposite to each other in a channel- width direction view (Fig. 14B-C, see modified Fig. 14C below). PNG media_image1.png 717 416 media_image1.png Greyscale Reclaim 2, Chung discloses that the protrusion is formed on around a center of a top surface of the 1st source/drain region, in a channel-length direction view (Fig. 14A-14C). Reclaim 3, Chung discloses that the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion is in a shape in which the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion is protruded in at least a vertical direction, in both the channel-width direction view and a channel-length direction view (Fig. 14A-14C). Reclaim 4, Chung discloses that the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion is protruded in a horizontal direction, in the channel-width direction view (Fig. 14A-14C). Reclaim 5, Chung discloses that the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion is protruded in a diagonal direction, in the channel-width direction view (Fig. 14A-14C). Reclaim 6, Chung discloses that the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion is in a shape in which the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion is protruded in at least a horizontal direction, in the channel-width direction view (Fig. 14A-14C). Reclaim 7, Chung discloses that the protrusion comprises p-type impurities or n-type impurities(Fig. 14A-14C). Reclaim 8, Chung discloses that a contact structure 234/236 connected to the protrusion (Fig. 14A-C). Reclaim 9, Chung discloses that a width of the 2ⁿᵈ source/drain region 248SD is smaller than a width of the 1st source/drain region 228SD, in a channel-width direction view, and wherein the protrusion is not vertically overlapped by the 2ⁿᵈ source/drain region (Fig. 14A-C). Regarding claim 10, Chung discloses that a three-dimensional field-effect transistor (3DSFET) device comprising: a 1st source/drain region 128SD (Fig. 14A-14C); and a 2ⁿᵈ source/drain region 248SD stacked above the 1st source/drain region 228SD, wherein the 1st source/drain region 228SED has a deformed shape at a 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion among a 1st upper corner portion and the 2nd upper corner portion opposite to each other, in a channel-width direction view (Fig. 14B-C, note: a deformed shape is not clearly defined yet, therefore, Chung’s element 228SD is considered as a deformed shape). Reclaim 11, Chung discloses that the 1st source/drain region has a greater height at the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion than at the 1st upper corner portion, in the channel- width direction view. Reclaim 12, Chung discloses that the 1st source/drain region has a greater width at a top surface portion than at a bottom surface portion, in the channel-width direction view. Reclaim 13, Chung discloses that the 1st source/drain region has a greater width at a top surface portion than at a bottom surface portion, in the channel-width direction view. Reclaim 14, Chung discloses that the 1st source/drain region has a protrusion on around a center of a top surface of the 1st source/drain region, in a channel-length direction view. Reclaim 15, Chung discloses that the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion comprises p-type impurities or n-type impurities. Regarding claim 16, Chung discloses that a method of manufacturing three-dimensional field-effect transistor (3DSFET) device, the method comprising: forming, on a substrate 202, a 1st source/drain region 228SD and a 2ⁿᵈ source/drain region 248SD above the 1st source/drain region 228SD (Fig. 14A-C); and structuring the 1st source/drain region 228SD such that the 1st source/drain region has a protrusion at a 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion among a 1st upper corner portion and the 2ⁿᵈ upper corner portion opposite to each other in a channel-width direction view (see modified Fig. 14C above). Reclaim 17, Chung discloses that a width of the 2ⁿᵈ source/drain region is smaller than a width of the 1st source/drain region, in the channel-width direction view, and wherein the protrusion is not vertically overlapped by the 2ⁿᵈ source/drain region. Reclaim 20, Chung discloses that the protrusion of the structured 1st source/drain region is in an extended shape in a vertical direction, a horizontal direction and a diagonal direction, in the channel-width direction view (Fig. 14A-C). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 18-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SU C KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-5972. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 to 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dale Page can be reached at 571-270-7877. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SU C KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2899
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 14, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Feb 06, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604570
LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585001
OPTICAL DETECTION APPARATUS AND OPTICAL DETECTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581776
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE WITH HIGH LUMINOUS EFFICIENCY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581914
OPTICAL METROLOGY WITH NUISANCE FEATURE MITIGATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12563981
METHOD OF PROCESSING SUBSTRATE, SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS, RECORDING MEDIUM, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
65%
With Interview (-12.4%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 899 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month