Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/242,399

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 05, 2023
Priority
Feb 09, 2023 — RE 10-2023-0017329
Examiner
YI, CHANGHYUN
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
1009 granted / 1075 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 9m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
1127
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
61.7%
+21.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1075 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Amendment filed on 5/5/26 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been fully considered but they are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used in the current rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lin (US 20220367622). Regarding claim 15. (Currently amended) Fig 24 of Lin discloses A semiconductor device comprising: an active pattern including a lower pattern 62 and sheet patterns 66 ([0014]/[0038]: 66 that will be patterned to form channel regions 68) spaced apart from each other on the lower pattern (via the lowermost sub-gate); sub-gate structures 122/124 [0015] positioned on the lower pattern with respect to a vertical cross section and surrounding the sheet patterns [0015]; source/drain patterns 98C (left and right side of the sub-gate structures) positioned on opposite sides of the sub-gate structures; and a stacked pattern 98A/98B positioned adjacent to and between a first source/drain pattern and a first sheet pattern (between left 98C and left 68 or between right 68 and right 98C), and including a first stacked pattern 98A and a second stacked pattern 98B sequentially stacked from a side surface (each lateral sides) of the first sheet pattern (ordered stack of 68/98A/98B), wherein both the first stacked pattern and the second stacked pattern include SiGe [0055], and wherein at least one of materials of the first stacked pattern and materials of the second stacked pattern, composition ratios of materials of the first stacked pattern ([0055]: ‘98A is less than a germanium concentration of the liner layers 98B’), and concentrations of dopants in the first stacked pattern and dopants in the second stacked patterns are different from each other ([0053]: ‘Each of the 98A, the 98B formed of be doped to different impurity concentrations’). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12, 14 and 19-20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 1, the cited prior art of record does not teach or fairly suggest, along with the other claimed features, “each stacked pattern further includes a third stacked pattern positioned between the second stacked pattern and a source/drain pattern, and the third stacked pattern and the second stacked pattern include different materials from each other”. Regarding claim 19, the cited prior art of record does not teach or fairly suggest, along with the other claimed features, “a first sub-gate electrode of a first sub-gate structure protrudes in the first direction past an end of each sheet pattern toward a source/drain pattern”. Claims 16-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 16, the cited prior art of record does not teach or fairly suggest, along with the other claimed features, “a third stacked pattern positioned between the second stacked pattern and the first the source/drain pattern, and the third stacked pattern and the second stacked pattern include different materials from each other”. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Changhyun Yi whose telephone number is (571)270-7799. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 8A-4P. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Davienne Monbleau can be reached on 571-272-1945. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Changhyun Yi/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jan 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 04, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 13, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 05, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12685135
LOCAL INTERCONNECT FORMATION AT DOUBLE DIFFUSION BREAK
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677467
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677535
METHOD FOR FABRICATING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672311
INTEGRATED CIRCUIT STRUCTURES WITH GATE VOLUME REDUCTION
3y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12672335
BACKSIDE CONTACT STRUCTURES FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+4.2%)
1y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1075 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month