Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/242,626

Methods And Apparatus For SBFD-Aware UE Configuration In Mobile Communications

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 06, 2023
Priority
Sep 15, 2022 — provisional 63/375,705 +1 more
Examiner
TON, DANG T
Art Unit
2476
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
MediaTek Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
556 granted / 625 resolved
+31.0% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
644
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 625 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed inventor as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 17-19 are under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Hu in view of Latheef et al. (2022/0038968). For claims 17-19, Hu et al. (2022/0124799) discloses a method comprising: receiving, by a processor of a user equipment (UE), a signaling from a network; and performing, by the processor(See paragraph 0049 lines 1-15), a measurement outside a downlink (DL) subband while the UE is not allowed to receive any signaling outside the DL subband of one or more partitioned slots or symbols ( See paragraph 0049 , 0129 lines 1-2, paragraphs 0085 lines 1-6 and 0118 lines 1-8), wherein the signaling configures a resource in one or more partitioned slots or symbols outside the DL subband, and wherein the performing of the measurement comprises performing a UE- to-UE cross link interference (UE-UE CLI) measurement in the configured resource (See paragraph 0097 lines 1-2), and wherein the performing of the measurement comprises performing a channel state information reference signal (CSI-RS) measurement ( See paragraph 0050 lines 1-9 and paragraph 0084 lines 1-8). For claims 17-19, Hu et al. discloses all the subject matter of the claimed invention with the exception of physical downlink control channel (PDCCH), downlink shared channel (PDSCH), or channel status information reference signal (CSI- RS) outside the DL subband in a communications network. Latheef et al. from the same or similar fields of endeavor teach a provision of physical downlink control channel (PDCCH), physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH), or channel status information reference signal (CSI-RS) outside the DL subband ( See paragraph 0475 lines 7-26). Thus, it would have been obvious to the person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use physical downlink control channel (PDCCH), physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH), or channel status information reference signal (CSI-RS) outside the DL subband as taught by Latheef et al. in the communications network of Hu et al. for the purpose of using physical downlink control channel (PDCCH), physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH), or channel status information reference signal (CSI-RS) outside the DL subband. Claims 1-16 and 20 are allowed. Applicants’ arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicants’ amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicants are reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANG T TON whose telephone number is (571)272-3171. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 5:30 AM to 3:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ayaz Sheikh can be reached at 571-272-3795. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANG T TON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476 /D.T.T/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2476
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Jan 14, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 23, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 20, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 13, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12745169
Selecting and controlling base stations for Wi-Fi access points with cellular connection
4y 1m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745176
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SUPPORTING POWER SAVING ON BASIS OF XR TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745130
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING BUFFER STATE REPORT IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM USING INTER-ENB CARRIER AGGREGATION TECHNOLOGY
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12739891
PRE-SCHEDULING SCHEDULED RESOURCE BLOCKS (SRB) TO USER EQUIPMENT (UE) TO IMPROVE LATENCY AND USER EXPERIENCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12719624
ENVIRONMENT SENSING USING RADIO FREQUENCIES
3y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+0.9%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 625 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month