Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/244,376

METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 11, 2023
Priority
Oct 11, 2022 — RE 10-2022-0129820 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, TIEN
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allowance Rate
19 granted / 21 resolved
+22.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
45
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
95.1%
+55.1% vs TC avg
§102
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§112
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 21 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Elections/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species A (Claims 1, 8, 10-20 and 23) in the reply filed on 03/10/2026 is acknowledged. However, claims 8, 12 and 18-19 in applicant’s election correspond to a non-elected species. Specifically, claim 8, lines 5-6: “based on a lower surface of the substrate, an upper surface of the transparent layer is positioned under an upper surface of the first mask layer” is drawn to at least Figures 34-45 of the non-elected species whereas elected Figures 1-12 do not illustrate such feature. For instance, Figures 5-10 require the upper surface of the transparent layer to be coplanar with upper surface of the mask. Claim 12, line 3: “forming a protective film covering the transparent layer” is drawn to at least Figures 26 or 29 of the non-elected species whereas elected Figures 1-12 do not illustrate such feature. For instance, Figure 12 requires the transparent layer to be removed before the deposition of the protective film. Claim 18, line 2 and 5: “a lower surface of the transparent layer is in contact with the first mask layer…a second portion under the transparent layer” is drawn to at least Figures 21-32 of the non-elected species whereas elected Figures 1-12 do not illustrate such feature. For instance, Figures 5-10 do not include a lower portion of the first mask under the transparent layer. Claim 19 requires all limitation of claim 18. Therefore, claims 8, 12 and 18-19 are withdrawn from consideration for being drawn to the non-elected species. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d) based upon an application filed in KOREA on 10/11/2022. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 09/11/2023is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5-7, 10-11, 13, 15-17 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being unpatentable over US20150079791A1; Park et al.; (hereinafter “Park”). Regarding Claim 1, Park teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device ([0008]), comprising: forming a step key (#104, Figure 2B) on a substrate (#100); forming a mold layer (#121) on the step key covering the step key (#104); forming a first mask layer (#116) on the mold layer (#121), forming a transparent layer (#120) in the first mask layer (#116) overlapping the step key (#104); forming a second mask layer (#122, Figure 3B) on the first mask layer (#116) and the transparent layer (#120); etching the mold layer (#121, Figure 4B-5B) using the second mask layer (#122), wherein the first mask layer (#116) includes a metal material ([0045]). Regarding Claim 5, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 1, wherein Park further teaches forming the transparent layer (#120, Figure 2B) includes: forming a key-hole (#118) extending through the first mask layer (#116) and overlapping with the step key (#104), and forming the transparent layer (#120, Figure 3B) in the key-hole (#104). Regarding Claim 6, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 5, wherein Park further teaches a first width of the key-hole (#118, Figure 2B) is greater than a second width of the step key (#104). Regarding Claim 7, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 5, wherein Park further teaches: forming the transparent layer (#120, Figure 3B) in the key-hole (#104) includes forming the transparent layer using chemical vapor deposition, physical vapor deposition, or atomic layer deposition ([0044]), and an upper surface of the transparent layer (#120) and an upper surface of the first mask layer (#116) are coplanar with each other ([0050]). Regarding Claim 10, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 1, wherein Park further teaches the mold layer (#121, Figure 2B) includes: a flat surface area non-overlapping with the step key (#121 comprises such as flat top surface non-overlapping key #104); and a curved surface area (#118b) overlapping with the step key (#104). Regarding Claim 11, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 1, wherein Park further teaches the mold layer (#121) includes: a first mold layer including silicon nitride (#106, [0044]); and a second mold layer including silicon oxide (#108/#112, [0044]). Regarding Claim 13, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 1, wherein Park further teaches a light transmittance of the transparent layer is greater than a light transmittance of the first mask layer ([0049], patterns #120 has higher optical transmittance than mask #116). Regarding Claim 15, Park teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device ([0008]), comprising: forming a substrate (#100, Figure 2B) including a chip area (#CR) and an out-of-chip area (#PR); forming a step key (#104) on the out-of-chip area (#PR) of the substrate; forming a mold layer (#121) on the substrate (#100) covering the step key (#104); forming a first mask layer (#116) on the mold layer (#121), forming a key-hole (#118) in the first mask layer (#116) overlapping the step key (#104); forming a transparent layer (#120, Figure 3B) in the key-hole (#118); forming a second mask layer (#122) on the first mask layer (#116) and the transparent layer (#120) while aligning the second mask layer using the step key ([0055]); etching the mold layer (#121, Figure 4B-5B) using the second mask layer (#122) to form a pattern hole (#132); and filling the pattern hole with a pattern material (Figure 7B-8B) to form a pillar structure (#140). Regarding Claim 16, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 15, wherein Park further teaches the first mask layer includes a metal material ([0045], mask #116 comprises metal). Regarding Claim 17, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 15, wherein Park further teaches the key-hole (#118, Figure 3B) extends through the first mask layer (#116), and a lower surface of the transparent layer (#120) is in contact with the mold layer (#114/#121). Regarding Claim 20, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 15, wherein Park further teaches: forming the pattern hole (#132, Figures 4B-5B) includes etching the first mask layer (#116) and the mold layer (#121), forming the pillar structure includes removing the second mask layer (#122, Figures 4B-5B) and forming the pillar structure (#136/#140, Figures 7B-8B) in the pattern hole (#132), and based on a lower surface of the substrate (#100), an upper surface of the pillar structure is positioned at a higher vertical level than a vertical level of a lower surface of the first mask layer (Figure 7B, upper surface of conductive layer #136 is at a higher level than mask #128, Figure 6B). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park in view of US20100309470A1; Liu et al.; (hereinafter “Liu”). Regarding Claim 14, Park teaches the method for manufacturing a semiconductor device as described in claim 1. Park does not explicitly teach the transparent layer includes hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, tantalum oxide, silicon oxide, or silicon nitride. However, Liu teaches a semiconductor device ([0004]), comprising a transparent layer (Figure 3, stripe #18 material formed in layer #21) includes hafnium oxide, titanium oxide, tantalum oxide, silicon oxide, or silicon nitride (#18 comprises silicon nitride). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the invention disclosed by Park with the teaching of Liu, as it would be a simple substitution of one known element (layer material of Park) for another (layer material of Liu) in comparable structures to obtain predictable results. See MPEP 2143(I)(B). Claim 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park in view of US20210098260A1; Yoon et al.; (hereinafter “Yoon”). Regarding Claim 23, Park teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device ([0008]), comprising: forming a substrate (#100, Figure 2B) including a chip area (#CR) and an out-of-chip area (#PR); forming a bit line on the substrate and in the chip area extending across the substrate ([0040], bit lines form in cell region of the substrate); forming a buried contact connected to the chip area of the substrate ([0040], contact plugs form in cell region of the substrate); forming a step key (#104) on the substrate (#100) and in the out-of-chip area (#PR); forming a mold layer (#121) on the chip area (#CR) and the out-of-chip area (#PR) covering the step key (#104); forming a first mask layer (#116) on the mold layer (#121), wherein the first mask layer includes a metal material ([0045], mask #116 comprises metal); forming a key-hole (#118) in the first mask layer (#116) overlapping the step key (#104); forming a transparent layer (#120, Figure 3B) in the key-hole (#118); forming a second mask layer (#122) on the first mask layer (#116) and the transparent layer (#120) while aligning the second mask layer using the step key ([0055]); etching the mold layer (#121, Figures 4B-5B) in the chip area (#CR) using the second mask layer (#122) to form a pattern hole (#132); forming a lower electrode (#140, Figures 7B-8B) filling the pattern hole (#132); and forming a dielectric film (#148, Figure 11B) and an upper electrode (#150) on the lower electrode (#140), wherein: a light transmittance of the transparent layer is greater than a light transmittance of the first mask layer ([0049], optical transmittance of pattern #120 is higher than mask #116), and a first vertical level of an upper surface of the lower electrode extends farther in a vertical direction relative to a bottom surface of the substrate than a second vertical level of an upper surface of the mold layer (Figure 8B, upper surface of electrode #140 is higher than an upper surface of layer #112/#108). Park does not explicitly teach forming the buried contact between the bit lines; forming a landing pad on the buried contact. However, Yoon teaches a method for manufacturing a semiconductor device ([0005]), comprising forming a buried contact (#256, Figure 9E, conductive plugs) between bit lines (#BL, bit lines); forming a landing pad (#LP, landing pads) on the buried contact (#256). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the invention disclosed by Park with the teaching of Yoon by known methods to yield predictable results (implementation of buried contacts and landing pads in lower structure of cell region of the substrate, see also [0039-0040] of Park). See MPEP 2143(I)(A). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US202120061732A1 – Figure 6-17 US20070018341A1 – Figures 2A-E Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TIEN TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-6967. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 9:00 am - 6:00 pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, CHRISTINE S KIM can be reached on (571)272-8458. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TIEN TRAN/Examiner, Art Unit 2812 /CHRISTINE S. KIM/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2023
Application Filed
May 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jun 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684757
Multi-Layer Random Access Memory and Methods of Manufacture
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684790
BIPOLAR TRANSISTORS
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684975
LIGHT EMITTING DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677545
ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672414
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.3%)
3y 2m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 21 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month