Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 18/245,348

ORGANIC CORE MATERIAL, PRODUCTION METHOD FOR SAME, LAMINATE INCLUDING ORGANIC CORE MATERIAL, AND CIRCUIT BOARD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 15, 2023
Examiner
MCNALLY, DANIEL
Art Unit
1746
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
resonac Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
683 granted / 1007 resolved
+2.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1031
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
51.9%
+11.9% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1007 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Claims 7, 10-14, 18 and 19 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11/20/2025. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I, claims 1-5, and 20-22 in the reply filed on 11/20/2025 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5, 21 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nakata [JPH02155726A, machine translation provided]. Nakata discloses a method for producing an organic core material, the method comprising steps of: preparing a plurality of sheets of first prepregs ach first prepreg having a first fiber cloth and a first resin layer formed from a first resin component and having the first fiber cloth embedded therein; (glass cloth prepregs placed in the intermediate layer, prepregs include glass cloth impregnated with thermosetting resin); preparing at least two sheets of second prepregs, each second prepreg having a second fiber cloth and a second resin layer formed from a second resin component and having the second fiber cloth embedded therein (glass nonwoven fabric used as the surface layer, including glass nonwoven fabric impregnated with thermosetting resin varnish); heating a laminated body including the second prepreg, a plurality of the first prepregs, and the second prepreg in order while applying a pressing force in a thickness direction of the laminated body (intermediate layer between surface layers is heated and pressed); wherein a content percentage of the second resin component based on a mass of the second prepreg is higher than a content percentage of the first resin component based on a mass of the first prepreg (surface layers have resin content of 66-70% and intermediate layer prepregs have a resin content 39-42%). With respect to claim 3, Nakata discloses the content percentage of the second resin component based on the mass of the second prepreg is 60% by mass or more (surface layers with resin content 66-70%). With respect to claim 5,Nakata discloses the first fiber cloth is a woven fabric (implied as a woven fabric as intermediate layer prepregs are described as glass cloth while other prepregs are explicitly disclosed as nonwoven). With respect to claim 21, Nakata discloses prior to heating the laminated body, a first laminated body (intermediate layer) comprising the plurality of sheets of first prepregs is placed between two sheets of the at least two sheets of second prepregs (surface layers; see examples). With respect to claim 22, Nakata discloses prior to heating the laminated body, placing the plurality of sheets of first prepregs (examples include 3 or 4 prepregs in intermediate layer) between two sheets of the at least two sheets of second prepregs (surface layers; see examples). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakata in view of Sanko [JPH05261861, machine translation provided]. Nakata discloses a method for producing an organic core material. Applicant is referred to paragraph 5 for a detailed discussion of Nakata. Nakata discloses intermediate and surface layers, but does not disclose the surface layer as including a woven fabric. Sanko disclose a method of producing an organic core material. Sanko discloses a core layer and surface layers made of a base material including glass woven fabrics impregnated with a resin. Sanko discloses surface layers including a woven fabric (paragraphs 0004, 0006-7; Table 1). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to modify the method of Nakata by using surface layers including woven glass fabric as taught by Sanko in order to improve the mounting of small parts to the laminated board by reducing the thermal expansion coefficient and improving the drilling of the laminate to mount the small parts. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nakata in view of Kariba [JP6-97670, machine translation provided]. Nakata discloses a method for producing an organic core material. Applicant is referred to paragraph 5 for a detailed discussion of Nakata. Nakata discloses heating and pressing the laminate of prepregs forming an intermediate layer between surface layers, but does not disclose first heating a first laminated body of the plurality of the first prepregs while applying a pressing force in a thickness direction of the first laminated body; and then placing the first laminated body between two sheets of the at least two sheets of second prepregs. Kariba discloses a method of making an organic core material including creating an inner layer circuit board by stacking sheets A2 and B and laminating the sheets with heat and pressure to obtain the composite structure 2, then the composite structure 2 is placed between prepreg sheets C and the stack is laminated and integrated with heat and pressure. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to modify the method of Nakata by first heating and pressing the inner prepreg layers and after the first heating and pressing placing the laminate between two outer layers for a second heating and pressing as taught by Kariba in order to prevent a slip phenomenon that could occur by the pressing of a multilayer stack. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL MCNALLY whose telephone number is (571)272-2685. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at 571-270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL MCNALLY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1746 DPM January 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 15, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594731
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR JOINING TOGETHER TWO JOINING PARTNERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589554
WAVEGUIDE FOR PLASTIC WELDING, ARRANGEMENT, AND WELDING METHOD WITH A WAVEGUIDE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF A WAVEGUIDE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583188
CONNECTION METHOD USING A LASER TRANSMISSION BONDING TECHNOLOGY, AN APPARATUS FOR BONDING AS WELL AS A PART MADE OF A LASER TRANSMISSIVE BONDED FIRST PLASTIC PART AND A SECOND PLASTIC PART
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577775
PANEL-FORMING PROCESS AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565010
DIFFERENT MATERIAL BONDING APPARATUS AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+13.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1007 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month