Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/246,633

FLIP CHIP MICRODEVICE STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Mar 24, 2023
Examiner
MEHTA, RATISHA
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Vuereal Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
559 granted / 625 resolved
+21.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
649
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 625 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 10/23/2025, with respect to claim 1 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection has been withdrawn. However after further search and/or consideration new rejection is presented. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 28-37 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Rotzoll et al (US 2018/0197471; hereinafter Rotzoll). Regarding claim 28, Figs 1-3 of Rotzoll discloses an optoelectronic system, the system comprising: more than one pixel (20; Fig 1; ¶ [0070]); each pixel having multiple microdevices (22; Fig 1; ¶ [0070]); and wherein first common lines (62; Fig 1; ¶ [0080]) connect microdevices (22; Fig 1; ¶ [0070]) and second common lines (60; Fig 1; ¶ [0080]) connect pixels (20; Fig 1; ¶ [0070]). Regarding claim 32, Figs 1-3 of Rotzoll discloses the first common lines (62; Fig 1; ¶ [0080]) are columns (Fig 1) and the second common lines (60; Fig 1; ¶ [0080]) are rows (Fig 1). Regarding claim 33, Figs 1-3 of Rotzoll discloses the first common lines and second column lines are select lines (Figs 1-3). Regarding claim 34, Figs 1-3 of Rotzoll discloses firstly a first column is activated and microdevices in the first column are driven followed by a second column being activated and microdevices in the second column are driven. (Figs 1-5) Regarding claim 35, Figs 1-3 of Rotzoll discloses firstly a first row is activated and microdevices in the first row are driven followed by a second row being activated and microdevices in the second row are driven. (Figs 1-5) Regarding claim 36, Figs 1-3 of Rotzoll discloses firstly a first column is activated and pixels in the first column are driven followed by a second column being activated and pixels in the second column are driven. (Figs 1-5) Regarding claim 37, Figs 1-3 of Rotzoll discloses firstly a first row is activated and pixels in the first row are driven followed by a second row being activated and pixels in the second row are driven. (Figs 1-5) Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Chaji et al (US 2016/0218143; hereinafter Chaji) in view of Oh et al (US 2020/0287110; hereinafter Oh). Regarding claim 1, Figs 3 and 6 of Chaji discloses an optoelectronic system, the system comprising: microdevices (601a/601b; Fig 6A; ¶ [0159]/ 102a/102b; Fig 3A; ¶ [0147]) transferred to a substrate (100; Figs 3A/6A; ¶ [0147]); openings (Figs 2B/ 6B; opening formed in layer 201) formed to provide access (Figs 4A and 6B) to the top of the microdevices (601a/601b; Fig 6A; ¶ [0159]/ 102a/102b; Fig 3A; ¶ [0147]); a common electrode (301; Fig 6F; ¶ [0154]); However Chaji does not expressly disclose a second opening providing access to a common electrode; and pads formed on top of openings coupling microdevices and the common electrode. In the same field of endeavor, Fig 5H of Oh discloses forming a common electrode (574; Fig 5H; ¶ [0073]) formed and a second opening (576; Fig 5H; ¶ [0074]) providing access (Fig 5H) to the common electrode (303; Fig 3D; ¶ [0154]) and pads (577; Fig 5H; ¶ [0075]) formed on top of openings (576; Fig 5H; ¶ [0074]) coupling microdevices (530; Fig 5H; ¶ [0062]) and the common electrode (574; Fig 5H; ¶ [0073]). Accordingly it would have been obvious to the person in the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention such that a second opening providing access to a common electrode and pads formed on top of openings coupling microdevices and the common electrode in order to the metal patterns for the contact layers and hence form the common electrode and connect them to the pads (¶ [0075]). Regarding claim 2, Figs 3 and 6 of Chaji discloses the common electrode (301; Fig 6F; ¶ [0154]) is transparent (¶ [0150]). Regarding claim 3, Figs 3 and 6 of Chaji discloses the common electrode (301; Fig 6F; ¶ [0154]) is formed on top of the substrate (100; Figs 3A/6A; ¶ [0147]). Regarding claim 4, Figs 3 and 6 of Chaji discloses there are buffer layers (201/202; Fig 2B; ¶ [0148]) before the common electrode (301; Fig 6F; ¶ [0154]). Regarding claim 5, Fig 3 and 6 of Chaji does not expressly disclose dielectric layers form on top of the common electrode with an opening in the dielectric layers. In the same field of endeavor, Fig 5H of Oh discloses dielectric layers (570; Fig 5H; ¶ [0069]) form on top of the common electrode (574; Fig 5H; ¶ [0073]) with an opening in the dielectric layers. Accordingly it would have been obvious to the person in the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention such a dielectric layers is formed on top of the common electrode with opening in dielectric layer in order to form the circuit board and forming connections in the opening in order to connect pads to the top of microdevice (¶ [0069]). Regarding claim 6, Figs 3 and 6 of Chaji discloses a bonding pad (101a/101b; Fig 2B; ¶ [0147]) is coupled to the common electrode (301; Fig 6F; ¶ [0154]). Regarding claim 7, Figs 3 and 6 of Chaji discloses the microdevice is on top (Fig 2B) of the bonding pad (101a/101b; Fig 2B; ¶ [0147]). Regarding claim 8, Chaji does not expressly disclose a third opening to the microdevice and a fourth opening provide access to the common electrode. In the same field of endeavor, Fig 5H of Oh discloses a third opening to the micro device and a fourth opening provide access to the common electrode (Fig 5H). Accordingly it would have been obvious to the person in the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention such that openings are formed to the microdevice and to provide access to the common electrode in order to form the vias which can in turn can provide connectivity between the microdevices and common electrode. (¶ [0069]) Regarding claim 9, Figs 3 and 6 of Chaji discloses a planarization layer (201; Fig 2B; ¶ [0148]) is formed on top of the substrate (Fig 2B). Regarding claim 10, Chaji in view of Oh as modified above in claim 8 (Fig 5H of Oh in particular) discloses pads (577; Fig 5H; ¶ [0075] of Oh) formed on top of third and fourth openings to provide access to the microdevice and the common electrode (303; Fig 3D; ¶ [0154]). Regarding claim 11, Chaji in view of Oh as modified above (Fig 5H of Oh in particular) discloses there are additional openings and pads to other microdevices (Fig 5H of Oh). Accordingly it would have been obvious to the person in the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention such that additional openings and pads are formed to other microdevices in order to form electrical connections between the microdevices and pads and common electrode. Regarding claim 12, Figs 3 and 6 of Chaji discloses the optoelectronic system is bonded to another substate to form a display or a senor array (¶ [0003]). Regarding claim 13, Chaji does not expressly disclose a planarization covers at least part of an optoelectronic device. In the same field of endeavor, Fig 5H of Oh discloses a planarization (575; Fig 5H; ¶ [0073]) covers at least part of an optoelectronic device (Fig 5H). Accordingly it would have been obvious to the person in the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention such that a planarization layers covers at least part of an optoelectronic device such that an insulating layer or planarization layer is formed in order to form openings in them in order to form electrical connections. Regarding claim 14, Chaji in view Oh as modified above in claim 13 (Fig 5H of Oh in particular) discloses the planarization layer (575; Fig 5H; ¶ [0073]) has an opening (576; Fig 5H) to provide an access to the common electrode and an additional opening (576; Fig 5H) to provide access to the top of the microdevice. Regarding claim 15, Chaji in view of Oh as modified above in claim 13 (Fig 5H of Oh in particular) discloses pads are formed to couple to the top of the micro device and the common electrode (Fig 5H of Oh). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RATISHA MEHTA whose telephone number is (571)270-7473. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 9:00am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eliseo Ramos Feliciano can be reached at 571-272-7925. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RATISHA MEHTA/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 23, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600904
CIRCULARLY POLARIZED LIGHT EMITTING ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604474
TRENCH PATTERNING PROCESS USING MICROCRACKING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595393
Curable Compositions for Forming Light Scattering Layers
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593733
Vertical Light Emitting Diode Die Packaging Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588335
LIGHT EMITTING DIODE FILAMENT INCLUDING FLIP CHIP LIGHT EMITTING DIODES TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PHOSPHOR THAT IS INTEGRATED INTO THE FILAMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 625 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month