Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/248,092

METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRODUCTION OF ALKYL POLYGLUCOSIDE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 06, 2023
Examiner
ROBINSON, RENEE E
Art Unit
1772
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
759 granted / 1029 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1064
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
§102
14.9%
-25.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1029 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of group I, claims 1-12, in the reply filed on 16 December 2025 is acknowledged. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(4) because: Reference character “103” has been used to designate both a falling film evaporator and a plate heat exchanger. Reference character “105” has been used to designate both a thin film evaporator and a flash tank. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the liquid phase" in line 4. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The prior art does not disclose or suggest a method of removing at least one impurity from an alkyl polyglucoside stream according the claimed technique, entailing passing an alkyl polyglucoside fluid stream through a plate heat exchanger where it receives thermal energy from a second fluid stream being simultaneously passed through the plate heat exchanger to form a heated alkyl polyglucoside stream, the heated alkyl polyglucoside stream comprising the alkyl polyglucoside and a gaseous phase comprising the at least one impurity, and separating the gaseous phase from the liquid phase. Known techniques for purification of alkyl polyglucoside streams include: Ulvenlund et al (WO 2021/255243): discloses purification of an alkyl polyglucoside stream by flash chromatography followed by freeze drying (see Example 1). Han (CN 113416611; English machine translation provided): discloses purification of an alkyl polyglucoside stream by phase separation and serial stages of distillation and film evaporation (see Example 1, S6). Jin et al (CN 1116900021, English translation provided): acknowledges that separation and purification of alkyl polyglucoside is typically accomplished by falling film evaporation under vacuum. However, this technique requires high energy consumption. The solution offered by Jin entails adding a reaction reagent into an alkyl polyglucoside fluid to form a eutectic solvent and subsequent phase separation (see pp. 1-2). Zhao et al (CN 111040004; English translation provided): discloses purifying alkyl polyglucoside by countercurrent extraction with supercritical CO2 (see pp. 2-3). However, there is no teaching and/or suggestion in the prior art to utilize the claimed technique entailing heat exchange in a plate heat exchanger followed by separation of a gaseous phase comprising impurities from a liquid phase comprising the alkyl polyglucoside. The office notes that plate heat exchangers are known in the art. See, e.g., Meschke et al (US 2009/0151917). However, without any clear indication of how they may be used specifically for the purification of alkyl polyglucoside fluid streams, there lacks sufficient teachings and/or suggestion in the prior art which would lead a person of ordinary skill to arrive at the claimed invention. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RENEE ROBINSON whose telephone number is (571)270-7371. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8:00a-5:00p and Friday 8:00a-2:00p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, In Suk Bullock can be reached at (571)272-5954. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Renee Robinson/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599883
SCREENING ASSEMBLY AND PROCESS FOR SCREENING POLYMER FROM AN EFFLUENT STREAM AT REDUCED LEVELS OF POLYMER ENTRAINMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595426
PROCESS FOR REMOVING CONTAMINANTS FROM CRUDE OIL
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577477
PROCESS AND SYSTEM FOR UPGRADING HYDROCRACKER UNCONVERTED HEAVY OIL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577198
ACETONITRILE SEPARATION PROCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577475
PROCESS FOR CONVERSION OF VERY LIGHT, SWEET CRUDE OIL TO CHEMICALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+23.5%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1029 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month