Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/254,072

Container Lids

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 23, 2023
Priority
Nov 27, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCT/IB2020/061242 +1 more
Examiner
COLLINS, RAVEN
Art Unit
3735
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Haag Innovations And Technologies Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
607 granted / 971 resolved
-7.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
1014
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
61.3%
+21.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 971 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/23/2026 has been entered. Claim 1 has been amended Claims 1-6 and 9 are presented for examination This action is Non-Final Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ignazio (US 2003/0000154). Claim 1. Ignazio discloses an apparatus comprising: a first track 14 to mount on a container along a first side of a container opening (abstract; fig. 1); a second track 16 to mount on the container along a second side of the container opening, wherein the first side is opposite the second side ([0026]; fig. 1); a frame 50 engaged with the first track and the second track, wherein the frame is to move along the first track and the second track between an open position and a closed position [0038-0041], a first panel 12a to be mounted on the frame (via stakes 44 and feet 27z) to cover a first portion of the container opening (fig. 1, 4); and a second panel 12b to be mounted on the frame to cover a second portion of the container opening (fig. 1, 4), wherein the second panel is substantially identical to the first panel, wherein the first panel is to overlap the second panel by a target distance (fig. 1-2), and wherein the target distance is dependent on a size of the container opening can be varied to accommodate different container sizes [0042]. Claim 2. Ignazio discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the frame is adjustable to fit a dimension of the container opening [0038-0041]. Claims 3-4. Ignazio discloses the apparatus of claim 2, wherein the frame includes first longitudinal portions 20, 22 and second longitudinal portions 24, 26, wherein the first longitudinal portions and the second longitudinal portions are to engage within a range of positions to adjust a length of the frame [0028]. Claim 5. Ignazio discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the frame is rotated about an axle relative to the container opening in the open position to facilitate access to the container opening [0038-0041]. Claim 6. Ignazio discloses the apparatus of claim 5, further comprising a cutout (opening for insertion of 44 to 50) on the frame around the axle to increase an angle of rotation about the axle at an edge of the container (fig. 4a, 5). Claim 9. Ignazio discloses the apparatus of claim 1, wherein the first panel includes a first connector element 28 to mate with a second connector element of the second panel, wherein the first connector element is a first plurality of ribs to mate with a second plurality of ribs of the second panel, and wherein the first plurality of ribs and the second plurality of ribs are uniform to allow for variable overlapping ([0046]; fig. 1-3). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to the claims have been considered but in view of the amendment the search has been updated, new prior art has been identified and applied, and a new rejection has been made. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RAVEN COLLINS whose telephone number is (571)270-1672. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30am to 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ANTHONY STASHICK can be reached at 571-272-4561. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RAVEN COLLINS/ Examiner, Art Unit 3735 /Anthony D Stashick/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3735
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
May 28, 2026
Interview Requested
Jun 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 04, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747093
DUAL STORAGE AND DISPOSAL DEVICE AND METHOD OF USE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12722847
CAN ENDS HAVING RE-CLOSABLE POUR OPENINGS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12703564
TOP SIDE BEAM OF CONTAINER AND CONTAINER
1y 4m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696967
REFILL AND POT FOR PACKAGING A COSMETIC PRODUCT COMPRISING SUCH A REFILL
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12698147
PACKAGE OF RECLOSABLE BAGS WITH STAGGERED SLIDERS
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+10.4%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 971 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month