Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Haag Innovations And Technologies Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a very specific technical focus for the company's current patent activity. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's innovation is being reviewed within a particular mechanical or medical device classification.
COLLINS, RAVEN is the busiest examiner, overseeing 1 pending office action. This examiner is responsible for the company's entire current pending workload. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action, the company's immediate success in the patent office is dependent on the outcome of this single review. The presence of only 1 active matter suggests a targeted approach to patent filings. Practitioners should focus on the specific tendencies of this examiner and the standards of the assigned art unit. The lack of examiner diversity means that the company's current prosecution experience is defined by a single individual's interpretation of the claims.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COLLINS, RAVEN | 1 | 62.5% | +10.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18254072 | Container Lids | COLLINS, RAVEN | 26d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3735 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18254072 | Container Lids | COLLINS, RAVEN | 3735 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | May 23, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial