Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/255,385

SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 01, 2023
Examiner
VALENZUELA, PATRICIA D
Art Unit
2812
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
645 granted / 715 resolved
+22.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
63 currently pending
Career history
778
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
60.1%
+20.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
8.6%
-31.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 715 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1-15 in the reply filed on 10/14/25 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hayasaki(USPGPUB DOCUMENT: 2010/0327383, hereinafter Hayasaki) in view of Akiyama (USPGPUB DOCUMENT: 2011/0024849, hereinafter Akiyama). Re claim 1 Hayasaki discloses a semiconductor device, comprising: a through electrode(26B)[0034] that penetrates a semiconductor substrate(10) along a direction perpendicular to a predetermined front surface of the semiconductor substrate(10); an insulating film(35) covering the through electrode(26B)[0034]; and a wiring layer(29A/28A/26A/24A) that includes a gate(24A) disposed in a region between an outer periphery(portion of 35 that extends from innermost 37 to outermost 35) of the insulating film(35) and an inner periphery(portion of innermost 35) of the insulating film(35) on the front surface. Hayasaki does not disclose a dummy gate Akiyama disclose a dummy gate(212) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the invention to apply the teachings of Akiyama to the teachings of Hayasaki in order to prevent an increase in electrical resistance at a connection [0004, Akiyama]. Re claim 2 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the dummy gate(212 of Akiyama) is not disposed inside the inner periphery(portion of innermost 35). Re claim 3 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the dummy gate(212 of Akiyama) is further disposed outside the outer periphery(portion of 35 that extends from innermost 37 to outermost 35). Re claim 4 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 3, wherein the semiconductor substrate(10) includes an element isolation region(22A) formed under the wiring layer(29A/28A/26A/24A), andthe dummy gate(212 of Akiyama) is disposed on an upper portion of the element isolation region(22A). Re claim 5 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein an area ratio[0037] of the dummy gate(212 of Akiyama) is not less than ten percent. Re claim 6 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein a predetermined number of wirings are formed in the wiring layer(29A/28A/26A/24A), anda pitch of the wirings inside the outer periphery(portion of 35 that extends from innermost 37 to outermost 35) is substantially equal to a pitch of the wirings outside the outer periphery(portion of 35 that extends from innermost 37 to outermost 35). Re claim 7 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein a gate electrode(51 of Akiyama) is further disposed in the wiring layer(29A/28A/26A/24A), anda material of the dummy gate(212 of Akiyama)[0032] is same as a material of the gate electrode(51 of Akiyama). Re claim 8 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 7, wherein the material of the dummy gate(212 of Akiyama)[0032] is any of polycrystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, tungsten, titanium, tantalum, and aluminum. Re claim 9 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein a gate electrode(51 of Akiyama) is further disposed in the wiring layer(29A/28A/26A/24A), andthe material of the dummy gate(212 of Akiyama)[0032] is different from a material of the gate electrode(51 of Akiyama). Re claim 10 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 9, wherein a material of the dummy gate(212 of Akiyama)[0032] is silicon nitride. Re claim 11 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein in the through electrode(26B)[0034], a cross-sectional area of an upper end on a front surface si e is smaller than a cross-sectional area of a lower end on a back surface side with respect to the front surface, andthe dummy gate(212 of Akiyama) is disposed between the outer periphery(portion of 35 that extends from innermost 37 to outermost 35) of the insulating film(35) covering the upper end of the front surface and the inner periphery(portion of innermost 35) of the insulating film(35) covering the upper end. Re claim 12 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein in the through electrode(26B)[0034], a cross-sectional area of an upper end on a front surface side is larger than a cross-sectional area of a lower end on a back surface side with respect to the front surface, andthe dummy gate(212 of Akiyama) is disposed between the outer periphery(portion of 35 that extends from innermost 37 to outermost 35) of the insulating film(35) covering the lower end of the front surface and the inner periphery(portion of innermost 35) of the insulating film(35) covering the lower end. Re claim 13 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor substrate(10) includes an element isolation region(22A) formed over an entire surface of a region between the outer periphery(portion of 35 that extends from innermost 37 to outermost 35) of the insulating film(35) and the inner periphery(portion of innermost 35) of the insulating film(35). Re claim 14 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein the semiconductor substrate(10) includes an element isolation region(22A) formed in a part of a region between the outer periphery(portion of 35 that extends from innermost 37 to outermost 35) of the insulating film(35) and the inner periphery(portion of innermost 35) of the insulating film(35), and the dummy gate(212 of Akiyama) is disposed on an upper side of the element isolation region(22A). Re claim 15 Hayasaki and Akiyama disclose the semiconductor device according to claim 1, wherein a gate electrode(51 of Akiyama) of a Fin field-effect transistor (Fin-FET) is further disposed in the wiring layer(29A/28A/26A/24A). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICIA D VALENZUELA whose telephone number is (571)272-9242. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Partridge can be reached at 571-270-1402. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICIA D VALENZUELA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2812
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 01, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604686
SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP AND SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604749
SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598990
ELECTRICALLY ISOLATED DISCRETE PACKAGE WITH HIGH PERFORMANCE CERAMIC SUBSTRATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598986
METAL INSULATOR METAL CAPACITOR (MIM CAPACITOR)
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593675
RETICLE STITCHING TO ACHIEVE HIGH-CAPACITY INTEGRATED CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+2.1%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 715 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month