Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/256,687

POSITIONING A DEVICE ASSOCIATED WITH MULTIPLE NETWORK SUBSCRIPTIONS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 09, 2023
Examiner
MANOHARAN, MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY
Art Unit
2647
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
409 granted / 627 resolved
+3.2% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
47 currently pending
Career history
674
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.1%
-37.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.9%
+24.9% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 627 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. 20206283, filed on Dec. 11, 2020. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-13, 16-17, 19-22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fischer et al. (hereinafter Fischer)(US 2016/0234709) in view of Kumar et al. (hereinafter Kumar)(US 9820091). Regarding claim 1, Fischer teaches an apparatus comprising at least one processor, and at least one memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to(item 200 in Fig. 2; also Fig. 1; base stations 144 and base stations 140): obtain a first positioning reference signal configuration from at least a first serving access node and a first neighbor access node comprised in a first network, wherein the apparatus is associated with a first network to the first network(P[0116], PRS configuration information; carrier frequency); determine first positioning information by receiving a first positioning reference signal based on the obtained first positioning reference signal configuration(P[0062], positioning information ToA); obtain a second positioning reference signal configuration from a second serving access node and a second neighbor access node in a second network, wherein the apparatus is further associated with a second network to the second network(P[0062], positioning information ToA); determine second positioning information by receiving a second positioning information reference signal based on the obtained second positioning reference signal configuration(P[0062], positioning information ToA); estimate a clock frequency difference between the first network and the second network and determine an offset between the first network and the second network(P[0071], offset and frequency difference); remove the determined offset from the obtained first positioning reference signal and the second positioning information reference signal(P[0075], RTD may be zero or known value); and determine a joint positioning information by using the first and the second positioning information([0128], mobile device position; frequency bias compensation). Fischer did not teach specifically first subscription and second subscription. However, Kumar teaches in an analogous art first subscription and second subscription(title and also abstract). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to have first subscription and second subscription in order to have wider applicability. Regarding claim 2, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is further caused to obtain the first positioning reference signal configuration after transmitting a first positioning request to the first serving access node(Kumar: Fig. 3, provide assistance data; also col. 13, lines 39-42, assistance data for a first candidate subscription; SIM-1). Regarding claim 3, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is further caused to obtain the second positioning reference signal configuration after transmitting a second positioning request to the first serving access node(Kumar: Fig. 3, provide assistance data; also col. 13, lines 45-48, assistance data for a second candidate subscription; SIM-2). Regarding claim 5, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an (apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the first positioning reference signal configuration is obtained from a frequency band used by the first network and the second positioning reference signal configuration is obtained from another frequency band used by the second network(Fischer: P[0049], base stations operating on different carrier frequencies F1 and F2). Regarding claim6, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus further comprises multiple receiver chains(Fischer: fig. 8, items 882, 884). Regarding claim 7, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is further caused to transmit the joint positioning information(Fischer: P[0144], mobile device sends the compensated measurement to the server). Regarding claim 8, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an apparatus according to claim 1, wherein one or more of the first or second positioning information comprises received signal time difference or downlink time difference of arrival(Fischer: P[0142], OTDOA between the first positioning signal and the second positioning signal). Regarding claim 9, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the joint positioning information comprises an estimate of the location of the apparatus(Fischer: P[0144], determine a position of the mobile device based on compensated measurement). Regarding claim 10, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is further caused to use the first positioning reference signal configuration or the second positioning reference signal configuration for obtaining positioning information with respect to both the first and the second network(Fischer: P[0142], difference between the first frequency of the first positioning signal and the second frequency of the second positioning signal; inter frequency bias compensation in the measurements). Regarding claim 11, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches an apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is a terminal device(Fischer: abstract). Claims 11-13, 16-17, 19-22 are rejected for the same reason as set forth in claims 1, 1-3, 5-8 respectively. Claim(s) 4, 18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Fischer et al. (hereinafter Fischer)(US 2016/0234709) in view of Kumar et al. (hereinafter Kumar)(US 9820091) and Bitra et al. (hereinafter Bitra)(US 2018/0184452). Regarding claim 4, Fischer in view of Kumar teaches all the particulars of the claim except an apparatus, wherein at least one of the following: the first positioning reference signal configuration or the second positioning reference signal configurations are obtained as broadcasts. However, Bitra teaches in an analogous art, wherein at least one of the following: the first positioning reference signal configuration or the second positioning reference signal configurations are obtained as broadcasts(P[0044], PRS positioning signals being broadcast). Therefore, it would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to have at least one of the following: the first positioning reference signal configuration or the second positioning reference signal configurations are obtained as broadcasts in order to have improved efficiency. Claim 18 is rejected for the same reason as set forth in claim 4. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MUTHUSWAMY GANAPATHY MANOHARAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5515. The examiner can normally be reached 6:30am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alison T Slater can be reached at 571-270-0375. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MUTHUSWAMY G MANOHARAN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 08, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12571920
TERMINAL DEVICE, INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12549954
SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING OPTIMIZED NETWORK RESOURCES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12523736
ON-DEMAND POSITIONING REFERENCE SIGNAL CONFIGURATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12520227
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING WIRELESS NETWORK CONGESTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12493100
PASSIVE POSITIONING WITH ANALOG BEAMFORMING
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+16.8%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 627 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month