Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/262,035

METHOD FOR CORRECTING LITHOGRAPHY PATTERN OF SURFACE PLASMA

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2023
Examiner
FRASER, STEWART A
Art Unit
1724
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Institute Of Microelectronics Chinese Academy Of Sciences
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1135 granted / 1320 resolved
+21.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
45 currently pending
Career history
1365
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
45.2%
+5.2% vs TC avg
§102
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
§112
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1320 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This is the initial office action for US Patent Application No. 18/262035 by Ma et al. Claims 1-10 are currently pending and have been fully considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-4 and 7-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious in view of Chen et al. (CN110716386 A), herein referred to as Chen, provided in Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement filed 7/19/2023, as evidenced by Luo et al. (US 2005/0233262 A1), herein referred to as Luo. Regarding claim 1, Chen teaches (Claim 1, pages 1 and 4 of Chen reference) a correction method of an optical proximity effect (a method for correcting a lithography pattern), comprising obtaining multiple test patterns as seen in Figure 4 of Chen (forming a plurality of test patterns on a test mask, each of the test patterns being characterized by at least a first test parameter and a second test parameter associated with the first test parameter); exposing a mask based on the test pattern to obtain exposure data (exposing a photoresist layer by using the test mask containing the test patterns to form a plurality of photoresist patterns, each of the photoresist patterns being characterized by at least a first exposure parameter and a second exposure parameter associated with the first exposure parameter); establishing an optical proximity effect correction (OPC) first rule base based on the corresponding relationship between the data of the test patterns and the exposure data (establishing a first data table based on a correspondence between the first test parameter and the second test parameter of the test pattern and the first exposure parameter and the second exposure parameter of the photoresist pattern); determining the key region of the layout to be corrected, and obtaining the graphic characteristic parameter of the key region; screening the OPC first rule base according to the graphic characteristic parameter of the key zone to obtain the OPC second rule base (processing the first data table according to the first exposure parameter to obtain a second data table); wherein Chen further teaches the step of determining the key area of the layout to be corrected comprises dividing the region of the layout to be corrected to determine the key region and non-key region of the layout to be corrected; and correcting the layout to be corrected based on the OPC second rule base to obtain a corrected layout, and making a mask for exposure based on the corrected layout (correcting second test parameters of a plurality of design patterns according to the second data table to obtain corrected design patterns, and manufacturing a mask for exposure by using the corrected design patterns), wherein Chen further teaches the step of correcting the layout to be corrected based on the OPC second rule library to obtain a corrected layout to make a mask for exposure based on the corrected layout comprises modifying the key region of the layout to be modified based on the OPC second rule base to obtain a modified layout, and making a mask for exposure based on the modified layout such that the key region comprises a pattern bearing the electrical performance, the pattern characteristic parameter of the key region at least comprises one of line width, interval and period of the pattern bearing the electrical performance. Chen does not appear to explicitly teach the limitations of claim 1 wherein the method of correcting is based on a surface plasma lithography process for forming a pattern (lithography pattern of a surface plasma). However, surface plasma lithography is a conventional lithography process, as evidenced by Luo [0041-0044]. Therefore, at the time of the filing date of the instant application, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to apply a known technique of correcting a lithographic mask taught by Chen for surface plasma lithography applications in order to improve lithographic mask fabrication processes so that high resolution patterns are formed with fewer defects during the lithographic exposure process. Regarding claim 2, Chen teaches (Figure 4 and page 4 of Chen reference) at least two test patterns of the plurality of test patterns have a same first test parameter. Regarding claim 3, Chen teaches (page 4 of Chen reference) the first test parameter is an arrangement period of a line of the test pattern, and the second test parameter is a line width of a line of the test pattern or a spacing between two lines of the test pattern; the first exposure parameter is an arrangement period of a line of the photoresist pattern, and the second exposure parameter is a line width of a line of the photoresist pattern or a spacing between two lines of the photoresist pattern. Regarding claim 4, Chen teaches (page 4 of Chen reference) the first exposure parameter of each photoresist pattern is the same as a first test parameter of a test pattern corresponding to the photoresist pattern. Regarding claims 7-9, Chen teaches (pages 4 and 5 of Chen reference) the plurality of the test patterns are arranged into a one-dimensional periodic test pattern, the one-dimensional period test pattern comprises a horizontal line periodic pattern or a vertical line periodic pattern and the horizontal line period pattern or the vertical line period pattern, an arrangement period of a line is equal to a sum of a line width of the line and a spacing between lines. Regarding claim 10, Chen teaches (pages 4 and 5 of Chen reference) the exposing a photoresist layer by using the test mask containing the test patterns to form a plurality of photoresist patterns, each of the photoresist patterns being characterized by at least a first exposure parameter and a second exposure parameter associated with the first exposure parameter comprises exposing the photoresist layer three times by using the test mask containing the test patterns, wherein each exposure forms a plurality of photoresist patterns, and each test pattern of the plurality of test patterns respectively forms three photoresist patterns after three exposures; and taking an average value of first exposure parameters and an average value of second exposure parameters of the three photoresist patterns as a first exposure parameter and a second exposure parameter of a photoresist pattern corresponding to the test pattern. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 5 and 6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 5 and 6 contain allowable subject matter because the prior art of record does not teach or suggest the specified method steps. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEWART A FRASER whose telephone number is (571)270-5126. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 7am-4pm, EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Miriam Stagg can be reached at 571-270-5256. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEWART A FRASER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1724
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603312
FUEL CELL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603306
SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DRAINING RESIDUAL WATER OF A FUEL CELL FOR A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596299
EUV TRANSMISSIVE MEMBRANE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591173
SUBSTRATE WITH MULTILAYER REFLECTIVE FILM, REFLECTIVE MASK BLANK, REFLECTIVE MASK, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591172
EUV TRANSMISSIVE MEMBRANE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1320 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month