Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/262,828

DISPLAY PANEL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME, DISPLAY DEVICE, AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Examiner
CRITE, ANTONIO B
Art Unit
2817
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
351 granted / 435 resolved
+12.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -12% lift
Without
With
+-11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
466
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.5%
+11.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 435 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This Action is responsive to the Preliminary Amendment filed on 07/25/2023. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 22-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ryu (US 2021/0200006). Regarding claim 1, Ryu (see, e.g., FIG. 1-FIG. 4) discloses a display panel, comprising: a circuit backplane 100 (Para 0070, Para 0072-Para 0073), including: a first main surface e.g., bottom surface of 100 (Para 0067-Para 0068); a second main surface e.g., top surface of 100 disposed opposite to the first main surface e.g., bottom surface of 100 (Para 0067-Para 0068); and a plurality of side surfaces e.g., side surfaces of 100 each connecting the first main surface e.g., bottom surface of 100 and the second main surface e.g., bottom surface of 100, at least one side surface e.g., left side surface of 100 in the plurality of side surfaces being a selected side surface e.g., left side surface of 100 (Para 0067-Para 0068); and a reflective layer 130 covering the selected side surface e.g., left side surface of 100, and the reflective layer 130 being configured to be removable under a predetermined process condition (Para 0086-Para 0091, Para 0098, Para 0157). Examiner Note: Examiner notes that 130 in Ryu is made of aluminum, which is a reflective material. The Examiner also notes that 130 is a patterned metal layer, which includes that 130 being capable of having portions removed and arranged by removing portions by a predetermined process condition. Regarding claim 22, Ryu (see, e.g., FIG. 3-FIG. 4) teaches a display device, comprising: the display panel 1 according to claim 1 (Para 0067, Para 0070); and a driving circuit board SGD located on a side where the second main surface e.g., top surface of 100 the circuit backplane 100 is located (Para 0074-Para 0078); and the driving circuit board SGD being coupled to the circuit backplane 100 through a plurality of connection leads SGL1-SGLm (Para 0074-Para 0078). Regarding claim 23, Ryu (see, e.g., FIG. 1-FIG. 4) teaches a tiled display device, comprising: a plurality of display devices 1 that are tiled and each according to claim 22 (Para 0062, Para 0067, Para 0070). Regarding claim 24, Ryu (see, e.g., FIG. 1-FIG. 4) discloses a method for manufacturing a display panel comprising: manufacturing a circuit backplane 100 (Para 0070, Para 0072-Para 0073); the circuit backplane 100 including a first main surface e.g., top surface of 100 and a second main surface e.g., bottom surface of 100 that are oppositely disposed, and a plurality of side surfaces e.g., side surfaces of 100 each connecting the first main surface e.g., top surface of 100 and the second main surface e.g., bottom surfaces of 100 (Para 0067-Para 0068, Para 0070, Para 0072-Para 0073); the first main surface e.g., top surface of 100 being configured to carry a plurality of light-emitting devices SPX (Para 0072, Para 0073); at least one side surface e.g., left side surface of 100 in the plurality of side surfaces e.g., side surfaces of 100 is a selected side surface e.g., left side surface of 100; and providing a reflective layer 130 covering the selected side surface e.g., left side surface of 100 (Para 0086-Para 0091, Para 0098); the reflective layer 130 being configured to be removable under a predetermined process condition (Para 0086-Para 0091, Para 0098, Para 0157). Examiner Note: Examiner notes that 130 in Ryu is made of aluminum, which is a reflective material. The Examiner also notes that 130 is a patterned metal layer, which includes that 130 being capable of having portions removed and arranged by removing portions by a predetermined process condition. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ryu (US 2021/0200006), and further in view of Oh (US 2024/0304773). Regarding claim 2, Ryu shows substantial features of the claimed invention; however, Ryu fails to specify that display panel according to claim 1, wherein a thickness of the reflective layer is H1, and H1 satisfies a relationship: 5 µm<H1< 20 µm. Oh (see, e.g., FIG. 2), on the other hand, teaches that a thickness of the thick metal film that forms the conductive pattern 180 is H1, and H1 satisfies a relationship: 5 µm<H1< 20 µm (Para 0018, Para 0040). However, differences in thicknesses will not support the patentability of subject matter encompassed by the prior art unless there is evidence indicating such thickness difference is critical. “Where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, it is not inventive to discover the workable ranges by routine experimentation”. In re Aller, 220 F.2d 454,456,105 USPQ 233, 235 (CCPA 1955). Since the applicant has not established the criticality (see next paragraph) of the thickness of the reflective layer being H1, and H1 satisfies a relationship: 5 µm<H1< 20 µm, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the thickness of the reflective layer in the device of Ryu through routine experimentation. CRITICALITY The specification contains no disclosure of either the critical nature of the claimed thickness of the reflective layer or any unexpected results arising therefrom. Where patentability is said to be based upon particular chosen dimensions or upon another variable recited in a claim, the applicant must show that the chosen dimensions are critical. In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-5, 7-9, 11, 13, 16, 18-21, 25, and 27-28 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANTONIO CRITE whose telephone number is (571) 270-5267. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 10:00 am - 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kretelia Graham can be reached at (571) 272-5055. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANTONIO B CRITE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2817
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604763
METHOD FOR PRODUCING A PLURALITY OF COMPONENTS, COMPONENT, AND COMPONENT ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593548
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588325
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588318
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588342
LIGHT-EMITTING PLATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (-11.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 435 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month