Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/264,856

COOLING CHANNELS IN A HIGH-DENSITY MOTOR

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Examiner
ELNAKIB, AHMED
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Raytheon Technologies Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
447 granted / 568 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
596
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
49.2%
+9.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 568 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1, 3-6, 8-9, 11, 13-14 of U.S. Application No. 18264856 filed on 08/09/2023 are presented for examination. Claims 2, 7, 10, 12 have been cancelled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any combination of reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 4-6, 8-9, and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Alfermann et al. (US 7705495; Hereinafter, “Alfermann”) in view of Cullen et al. (US 2008/0197724; Hereinafter, “Cullen”). Regarding claim 1: Alfermann discloses a stator (14) comprising: a stator hub (core 20); a plurality of stator teeth (24) extending from the stator hub (20) that define a stator slot (the space between teeth 24); at least one winding (28) disposed in the stator slot (fig. 1-4), the winding (28) including at least one winding cooling passage (37) formed therein (fig. 4); wherein the winding (28) is encased in a potting material (coil 28 is impregnated with epoxy resin 30 including first layer 36 and second layer 41; column 2, lines 35-40, and column 3, lines 44-64) and the winding cooling passage (37) passes through the potting material (fig. 4): wherein the winding cooling passage (37) is connected to an inlet plenum (where passage 50 meets passage 37 as seen in fig. 5). Alfermann does not specifically show an outlet plenum. Cullen discloses cooling passage connected to an inlet plenum (56; fig. 13) and an outlet plenum (58). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the stator of Alfermann with the cooling passage connected to an outlet plenum as disclosed by Cullen to provide a way for the coolant return ensuring continuous thus reliable cooling circuit. Regarding claim 4/1: Alfermann in view of Cullen discloses the limitations of claim 1 and Alfermann further discloses that the at least one winding includes a plurality of windings (plurality of windings are seen in fig. 2) and the stator (14) further includes: one or more winding separators (annotated fig. 4 below) formed of insulating material (epoxy resin 41) and disposed between adjacent ones of the plurality of windings (28). PNG media_image1.png 434 612 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5/4/1: Alfermann in view of Cullen discloses the limitations of claim 4 and Alfermann further discloses that the one or more winding separators (one separator in each slot as seen in fig. 2) include cooling passages formed therein (annotated fig. 4 above, and fig. 2). Regarding claim 6/1: Alfermann in view of Cullen discloses the limitations of claim 1 and Cullen further discloses that the at least one winding (12) includes a plurality of winding cooling passages (within the ceramic insert 48) formed therein (fig. 10). Regarding claim 8/1: Alfermann in view of Cullen discloses the limitations of claim 1 and Alfermann further discloses that the at least one winding cooling passage (37) is configured to convey a coolant (oil 40) through the winding (28). Regarding claim 9: Alfermann discloses a stator (14) comprising: a stator hub (20); a plurality of stator teeth (24) extending from stator hub (20) to define a plurality of stator slots (between each two teeth 24); a plurality of windings (28) with at least one winding (28) disposed in each stator slot (fig. 4); and at least one winding separator (annotated fig. 4 below) disposed between adjacent ones of the plurality of windings (28), the at least one winding separator including at least one cooling passage (37) formed therein and configured to convey a coolant (oil 40) through the winding separator (col. 4, lines 9-28); PNG media_image1.png 434 612 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein the cooling passage (37) is connected to an inlet plenum (seen in fig. 5 where passage 50 meet with passage 37); wherein the plurality of windings (28; fig. 2) including at least one winding cooling passage (37; fig. 4) formed therein wherein the winding (28) is encased in a potting material (coil 28 is impregnated with epoxy resin 30 including first layer 36 and second layer 41; column 2, lines 35-40, and column 3, lines 44-64) and the winding cooling passage (37) passes through the potting material (36; fig. 4). Alfermann does not specifically show an outlet plenum. Cullen discloses cooling passage connected to an inlet plenum (56; fig. 13) and an outlet plenum (58). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the stator of Alfermann with the cooling passage connected to an outlet plenum as disclosed by Cullen to provide a way for the coolant return ensuring continuous thus reliable cooling circuit. Regarding claim 13/9: Alfermann in view of Cullen discloses the limitations of claim 9 and Cullen further discloses that the at least one of the plurality of windings (12) includes a plurality of winding cooling passages (within 48; fig. 10) formed therein. Claims 3, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Alfermann in view of Cullen and in further view of Pyrhonen et al. (US 2013/0285487; Hereinafter, “Pyrhonen”). Regarding claim 3/1: Alfermann in view of Cullen discloses the limitations of claim 1 and but does not disclose the winding is formed of Litz wire. Pyrhonen teaches forming the windings of litz wire (para [0056]). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have formed the windings of the stator of Alfermann in view of Cullen with of litz wire as taught by Pyrhonen since litz wires are more compact thus has higher slot fill ratio. Regarding claim 11/9: Alfermann in view of Cullen discloses the limitations of claim 9 and but does not disclose the winding is formed of Litz wire. Pyrhonen teaches forming the windings of litz wire (para [0056]). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have formed the windings of the stator of Alfermann in view of Cullen with of litz wire as taught by Pyrhonen since litz wires are more compact thus has higher slot fill ratio. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cullen in view of Hassett et al. (US 2008/0023177; Hereinafter, “Hassett”). Regarding claim 14/13/9: Alfermann in view of Cullen discloses the limitations of claim 13 and but does not disclose at least one heat pipe inserted into at least one winding. Hassett discloses at least one heat pipe (20; para [0031]) inserted into at least one winding (18; para [0031], and fig. 6). Therefore, it would have been obvious for a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have configured the stator of Alfermann in view of Cullen with at least one heat pipe inserted into at least one winding as taught by Hassett since heat pipes offers enhanced heat transfer efficiency, reduced thermal resistance, and improved reliability. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AHMED ELNAKIB whose telephone number is (571)270-0638. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tulsidas Patel can be reached at 571-272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AHMED ELNAKIB/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
May 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 29, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601373
REFRIGERANT COMPRESSOR INCLUDING GROOVED AUXILIARY BEARING INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597816
ROTOR, PERMANENT MAGNET MOTOR AND POWERTRAIN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584521
HYBRID AIRFOIL BEARING WITH ACTIVE DAMPING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587064
ELECTRIC MOTOR SYSTEM, TURBO COMPRESSOR, AND REFRIGERATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587071
DRIVE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+8.7%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 568 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month