Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 18/265,971

MOLDING RESIN COMPOSITION AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 08, 2023
Examiner
FISCHER, JUSTIN R
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Resonac Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
44%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
47%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 44% of resolved cases
44%
Career Allow Rate
724 granted / 1626 resolved
-20.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
106 currently pending
Career history
1732
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
69.8%
+29.8% vs TC avg
§102
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1626 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. 3. Claim(s) 1-3 and 5-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeon (KR 1454111, of record). Jeon is directed to a composition (claimed molding resin composition) comprising an epoxy resin, a first inorganic filler having a low thermal expansion coefficient, such as calcium titanate, a second inorganic filler having a low dielectric loss rate, such as alumina, and a curing agent. Jeon additionally states that a ratio between the first inorganic filler and the second inorganic filler ranges between 1/1.5 (approximately 0.67) and 1/0.5 (2). Given the general disclosure of Jeon, one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to select the specific inorganic fillers identified above at a loading in accordance to the claimed invention (between 60% and 80%). Additionally, Applicant has not provided a conclusive showing of unexpected results for the claimed combination of materials and loadings. For example, Comparative Example 4, when compared with Example 13, demonstrates a greater dielectric constant and a smaller dielectric loss tangent (these benefits are identified by Applicant as corresponding with the inventive concept- see paragraphs 7 and 111 in original disclosure). Additionally, the dielectric constant and dielectric loss tangent are substantially the same in Example 10 and Comparative Example 1. Lastly, regarding claim 1, Jeon discloses an active ester curing agent (1st material listed under “preferred components” on top of page 3 of the prior art document sent on December 11, 2025). Regarding claims 5 and 6, given that the epoxy based composition of Jeon can include silica and calcium titanate at loadings in accordance to the claimed invention, it reasons that the relative dielectric constant of the total amount of inorganic filler (silica and calcium titanate) in Jeon would mimic that required by the claimed invention. With respect to claim 7, the inorganic filler in Jeon has a total loading or amount between 50% and 80%. As to claims 8 and 9, the claim is directed to a molding resin composition and limitations pertaining to the intended use of such a composition fail to further define the makeup of the claimed composition. Regarding claim 10, Jeon refers to a prepreg of a printed circuit board used in an electronic device. 4. Claim(s) 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeon and further in view of Kang (US 2008/074334, of record). As detailed above, Jeon is directed to a printed circuit board application including an epoxy based composition comprising a combination of inorganic fillers. In such an instance, though, Jeon fails to specifically describe the inclusion of an antenna. In any event, printed circuit boards are commonly formed with antenna portions, as shown for example by Kang (Paragraph 45). One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to include an antenna in the printed circuit board of Jeon (consistent with the known makeup of printed circuit boards). Response to Arguments 5. Applicant's arguments filed March 10, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant disagrees with the Examiner’s assertion that Jeon discloses an active ester curing agent. Thus argument is not entirely understood since the 1st component listed under curing agents is in fact an active ester curing agent. Applicant further contends that the examples in Jeon do not employ active ester curing agents, nor do they demonstrate or disclose the effects achieved when active ester curing agents are utilized. It is not required for a reference to discloses working examples for each and every possible combination of materials. In this instance, the first material listed under curing agents is an active ester curing agent. Thus, Jeon expressly teaches a composition including an active ester curing agent. Additionally, when looking at Examples 13 and 14, the type of curing agent, the amount of curing agent, the amount of curing promoter, and the amount of inorganic agents are varied such that is unclear if any realized benefits are a function of any individual parameter (no evidence that an active ester curing agent is responsible for any realized benefits). Conclusion 6. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 7. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN R FISCHER whose telephone number is (571)272-1215. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-2:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at 571-270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Justin Fischer /JUSTIN R FISCHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749 April 3, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 08, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 10, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600178
TUBELESS TIRE INSERT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594792
Tire With Pressure Zero Sidewall Hoop Rings and Method of Manufacture
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12583259
PNEUMATIC TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576675
TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570106
ASSEMBLY FOR A TIRE, TIRE AND ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
44%
Grant Probability
47%
With Interview (+2.6%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1626 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month