Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/267,173

ORGANOMETALLIC COMPLEX, LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE, LIGHT-EMITTING APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND LIGHTING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 14, 2023
Priority
Dec 25, 2020 — JP 2020-216304 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allowance Rate
407 granted / 627 resolved
At TC average
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
49 currently pending
Career history
675
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.4%
+9.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 627 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/14/2026 has been entered. Claims 2, 5, 14, 15, 22-24, and 28 are pending. The previous rejection of claims 2, 5, 14-27 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo et al (US2017/0288154) is maintained in view of applicant’s amendment. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 2, 5, 14, 15, 22-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo et al (US2017/0288154). Regarding claims 2 and 5, Seo discloses a light-emitting device comprising an EL layer between a pair of electrodes, wherein the EL layer comprises a hole-injection layer, a hole-transport layer, and a light-emitting layer ((Fig. 1A and 1B, para 0096 and 0136), wherein the hole-injection layer comprises a first organic compound and a second organic compound (para 0140), wherein the first organic compound comprises a halogen group or a cyano group (para 0145), wherein the second organic compound has a HOMO level greater than or equal to -5.7 eV and less than or equal to -5.4 eV (4,4′,4″-tris(carbazol-9-yl)triphenylamine (abbreviation: TCTA, para 0141), wherein the hole-transport layer comprises an aromatic amine compound or a carbazole derivative (para 0141-0142), wherein the light-emitting layer comprises a third organic compound, a fourth organic compound, and an organometallic complex represented by General Formula (G2) (the light-emitting layer 113 may contain, in addition to the light-emitting substance, two kinds of organic compounds that can form an excited complex (also called an exciplex) at the time of recombination of carriers (electrons and holes) in the light-emitting layer 113 (the two kinds of organic compounds may be any of the host materials described above, para 0146). Seo discloses an organometallic complex of chemical formula G2, exemplified by formula 300 and formula 118 below. The formulas as in claims 2 and 5 differ from the formulas described in Seo in that the ligand including pyridine coordinate to iridium instead of quinoline. However, Seo discloses that the first heteroaromatic ring included in the first ligand over which the HOMO is likely to be distributed includes a pyridine ring, a quinoline ring, an isoquinoline ring, an imidazole ring, a benzimidazole ring, and the like (para 0100 and 102). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filling date of the invention to coordinate various known ligands for the purpose of obtaining a light emitting element having improved carrier-injection and carrier-transport properties with respect to both electrons and holes (para 0114). A person of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to replace the pyridine ring with a quinoline ring in the formula (118) of Seo with a reasonable expectation of obtaining an organometallic complex that can be used in an EL layer of a light-emitting element to decrease drive voltage and increase efficiency (para 0469). PNG media_image1.png 203 353 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 213 322 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 198 305 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claims 14 and 15, Seo does not disclose a half width and a peak wavelength of an emission spectrum of the organometallic complex. However, the organometallic complex of prior art is structurally similar that set forth by applicant. Therefore, the organometallic complex of prior art would possess the same properties as claimed. A person having an ordinary skill in the art would reasonably expect the organometallic complex of Seo to have the claimed half width and peak wavelength of an emission spectrum. Regarding claim 22, Seo discloses a light-emitting apparatus comprising: the light-emitting device according to claim 2; and at least one of a transistor and a substrate (Figs. 3A to 3C, and para 00187-0203). Regarding claim 23, Seo discloses an electronic device comprising: the light-emitting apparatus according to claim 22; and at least one of a microphone, a camera, a button for operation, an external connection portion, and a speaker (Figs. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5D′-1, and 5D′-2 and FIGS. 6A to 6C, para 0217). Regarding claim 24, Seo discloses lighting device comprising the light-emitting device according to claim 16, and a housing (para 0218). Regarding claim 26, Seo discloses an electronic device comprising: the light-emitting apparatus according to claim 25; and at least one of a microphone, a camera, a button for operation, an external connection portion, and a speaker (Figs. 5A, 5B, 5C, 5D, 5D′-1, and 5D′-2 and FIGS. 6A to 6C, para 0217). Regarding claim 27, Seo discloses a lighting device comprising the light-emitting device according to claim 19, and a housing (para 0218). Claim 28 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Seo et al (US2017/0288154) as applied above, further in view of Yamaguchi et al (WO2019097361). The machine translation of WO2019097361 is relied for rejection purposes. Regarding claim 28, Seo discloses the light emitting device as described above and is incorporated herein by reference. Seo does not disclose the first organic compound is a [3]radialene derivative (para 0145). Yamaguchi discloses [3]radialene derivatives are used the hole injection layers (para 0123). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filling date of the invention to use [3]radialene derivatives as acceptor materials in the hole injection layers of Seo with a reasonable expectation of forming hole injection layers that can be used in an EL layer of a light-emitting element to decrease drive voltage and increase efficiency. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 8/14/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant disagrees with the examiner’s rejection because Seo has not been shown to teach or suggest the recited combination or appreciate synergistic advantages thereof; in particular that claim 2 requires a combination of a light-emitting layer using an exciplex host system of third and fourth organic compounds, paired with a composite hole-injection layer having a second organic compound having a specific deep HOMO level greater than or equal to -5.7 eV and less than or equal to -5.4 eV, and a specific organometallic complex. The examiner respectfully disagrees with applicant’s remarks/arguments. The combination of a light-emitting layer using an exciplex host system of third and fourth organic compounds, paired with a composite hole-injection layer having a second organic compound having a specific deep HOMO level greater than or equal to -5.7 eV and less than or equal to -5.4 eV, and a specific organometallic complex are disclosed by Seo as described above. Seo also discloses that the light-emitting layer 113 may contain, in addition to the light-emitting substance, two kinds of organic compounds that can form an excited complex (also called an exciplex) at the time of recombination of carriers (electrons and holes) in the light-emitting layer 113 (the two kinds of organic compounds may be any of the host materials described above). In order to form an exciplex efficiently, it is particularly preferable to combine a compound which easily accepts electrons (a material having an electron-transport property) and a compound which easily accepts holes (a material having a hole-transport property). In the case where the combination of a material having an electron-transport property and a material having a hole-transport property which form an exciplex is used as a host material as described above, the carrier balance between holes and electrons in the light-emitting layer can be easily optimized by adjustment of the mixture ratio of the material having an electron-transport property and the material having a hole-transport property. The optimization of the carrier balance between holes and electrons in the light-emitting layer can prevent a region in which electrons and holes are recombined from existing on one side in the light-emitting layer. By preventing the region in which electrons and holes are recombined from existing on one side, the reliability of the light-emitting element can be improved. See paragraph 146. Each and every claim limitation have been taught or suggested by Seo as well as the advantage of using an exciplex host system of third and fourth organic compounds in the light-emitting layer. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAIDUNG D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5455. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 10a-3p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAIDUNG D NGUYEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 9/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 24, 2026
Response Filed
May 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744240
SULFIDE ELECTROLYTES AND EFFICIENT METHODS FOR MAKING THE SAME
1y 4m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12692333
DISPERSANT FOR POWER STORAGE DEVICE POSITIVE ELECTRODE
2y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12668517
FUNCTIONALIZED PHOSPHONATES, AND WATER-SOLUBLE SALTS AND N-OXIDE DERIVATIVES THEREOF, AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF AS SCALE INHIBITOR
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12671082
Electroactive Materials for Metal-Ion Batteries
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12658344
COPPER-ANF COMPOSITE CONDUCTOR FABRICATION
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.4%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 627 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month