DETAILED ACTION
Status of Claims
Claims 1-14 are pending. Of the pending claims, claims 1-12 are presented for examination on the merits, and claims 13 and 14 are withdrawn from examination.
Claim 1 is currently amended.
Status of Previous Objection to the Drawings
The previous objection to the drawings is withdrawn in view of the replacement drawing sheet of FIG. 1 submitted on 02/23/2026.
Status of Previous Objection to the Specification
The previous objection to the abstract of the disclosure is withdrawn in view of the replacement abstract submitted on 02/23/2026.
Status of Previous Claim Objections
The previous objection to claim 1 is withdrawn in view of the amendments to the claim.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action.
Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US 2020/0087746 (A1) (also WO 2018/110676 (A1)) to Omura et al. (“Omura”).
US 2020/0087746 (A1) is a pre-grant publication of U.S. appl. ser. no.16/468,087, which is a 371 national stage application of PCT/JP2017/044989, published by WIPO as WO 2018/110676 (A1). The pre-grant publication will serve as an equivalent of and the translation for the WIPO publication.
Regarding claims 1-12, the claims remain rejected for the reasons presented in the Office action dated 11/24/2025.
Response to Arguments
Applicant's arguments filed 02/23/2026 have been fully considered, but they are not persuasive.
Applicant argues that Omura neither discloses claimed Formula 1 nor defines the correlation between residual stress and thickness of the layers. Applicant further argues that Omura only discloses tension during the continuous annealing, whereas the tension of the present invention occurs during the forming of the insulating coating layer.
In response, the line tension in Omura is applied to facilitate film (coating) formation (para. [0021], [0039], [0049], [0057], [0058], [0064]; header labels in Table 1, Table 8, and Table 10). In one embodiment, oxide film formation includes a step of applying a line tension applied of 0.5 kgf/mm2 (para. [0021]). In another embodiment, tension coating baking treatment also serves as flattening annealing, and the line tension applied is 0.7 kgf/mm2 (para. [0049]). These values fall within the range of 0.20-0.70 kgf/mm2 disclosed in the specification (p. 25 – lines 22-23). Thus, the line tension in Omura is not limited solely to a continuous annealing function without coating, but rather is part of an annealing step for conducting coating treatment, and the claimed Formula 1 is expected to be satisfied by Omura’s steels given that its method of manufacture matches the method of manufacture disclosed in the present specification.
Applicant additionally remarks that Omura does not disclose maximum and minimum values of the tension.
In response, in an embodiment, Omura discloses that the tension during sheet passing in each of the temperature ranges was 0.7 kgf/mm2 (para. [0049]). This suggests maintaining the line tension value, i.e., little deviation, which would meet Formula 2 of the specification (p. 26 – lines 15-18).
Conclusion
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VANESSA T. LUK whose telephone number is (571)270-3587. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30 AM - 4:30 PM ET.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Keith D. Hendricks, can be reached at 571-272-1401. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/VANESSA T. LUK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1733
April 14, 2026
Prosecution Insights