Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: LUK, VANESSA TIBAY

Tech Center 1700 • Art Units: 1733 1738 1793

This examiner grants 54% of resolved cases

Analysis

Vanessa Tibay Luk serves in Art Unit 1733 within Tech Center 1700. The examiner has 737 resolved cases and an allowance rate of 54.4 percent. This provides a baseline for success in this technology area, indicating that over half of the applications reach a grant. Practitioners can use the 54.4 percent figure to set realistic expectations for clients regarding the likelihood of a favorable outcome during prosecution.

The interview lift is 26.3 percent. This significant lift suggests that interviews are an effective tool for resolving issues and securing an allowance. Practitioners should consider the 26.3 percent lift as a strong reason to engage the examiner in verbal discussion, as it substantially improves the odds of a grant compared to written responses alone. Direct communication appears to be a key factor in overcoming rejections.

The median days to allowance is 1407. This timeline indicates that the prosecution process typically takes nearly four years. The 54.4 percent allowance rate and 1407-day median offer a baseline for planning and managing expectations. These metrics suggest that while the process is lengthy, utilizing the 26.3 percent interview lift can be a strategic way to navigate the multi-year timeline toward a successful grant.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

54.4%
Allow Rate
-10.6% vs TC avg
777
Total Applications
+26.3%
Interview Lift
1407
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 737 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.7%
§101 Eligibility
7.3%
§102 Novelty
57.3%
§103 Obviousness
28.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18082980 ALUMINUM ALLOYS WITH HIGH STRENGTH AND COSMETIC APPEAL Non-Final OA Apple Inc.
18682221 METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN IRON MELT Non-Final OA ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG
18288300 Gas atomizer Non-Final OA ArcelorMittal
18286599 Process for cooling and transporting metal powder Non-Final OA ArcelorMittal
18325774 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRODUCING COLD SPRAYED COMPONENTS WITH COATINGS THEREON Final Rejection HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
18702173 R-T-B BASED PERMANENT MAGNET Non-Final OA TDK CORPORATION
18630630 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE SINTERABLE SILVER NANOALLOY INKS AND PASTES Non-Final OA The Research Foundation for the State University of New York
18268584 GRAIN-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR Non-Final OA POSCO Co., Ltd
18268387 NON-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME Non-Final OA POSCO Co., Ltd
18268545 NON-ORIENTED ELECTRICAL STEEL SHEET AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME Non-Final OA POSCO Co., Ltd
18032977 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING TAILOR WELDED BLANK USING STEEL SHEET FOR HOT PRESSING HAVING AL-FE-BASED INTERMETALLIC ALLOY LAYER Non-Final OA POSCO CO., LTD
18358369 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FORMING INTERNAL STRUCTURES OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) OBJECTS Final Rejection XEROX CORPORATION
17677343 MAGNETIC RIBBON AND MAGNETIC CORE USING SAME Final Rejection Niterra Materials Co., Ltd.
18102517 BIMODAL CEMENTED CARBIDE POWDERS FOR ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING AND STRUCTURED BODIES MADE THEREFROM Final Rejection Kennametal Inc.
18649164 ALUMINUM-COPPER-LITHIUM ALLOY PRODUCTS Non-Final OA CONSTELLIUM ISSOIRE
17282326 PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING AN ALUMINUM ALLOY PART Final Rejection C-TEC CONSTELLIUM TECHNOLOGY CENTER

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month