Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/269,211

DECODING METHOD, DECODING APPARATUS, DECODING PROGRAM AND DATA STRUCTURE OF ENCODED POINT CLOUD DATA

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 22, 2023
Examiner
YENTRAPATI, AVINASH
Art Unit
2672
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
NTT, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
69%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
499 granted / 671 resolved
+12.4% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-5.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
698
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 671 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1.1 With regard to claim 1, D1 teach decoding method for decoding point cloud data (see ¶¶ 128, 147, fig. 1: encoding and decoding system), the decoding method comprising: a step of specifying reference values corresponding to a plurality of points (see ¶¶ 194, 401, 494, 495: reference point); a step of decoding attribute residuals of the plurality of points from encoded residual data obtained by encoding the attribute residuals, the attribute residuals of the plurality of points being residuals of attribute values of the plurality of points with respect to the reference values (see ¶¶ 494-495); and a step of calculating, for each of the plurality of points, an attribute value of the point from an attribute residual of the point and a reference value corresponding to the point (see ¶¶ 494-495). With regard to claim 2, D1 teach wherein the plurality of points include points belonging to different groups, and in the step of specifying the reference values, a reference value corresponding to a group to which each of the plurality of points belongs is specified (see ¶¶ 441, 445: group of frames; see also ¶¶ 494-495). With regard to claim 3, D1 teach wherein the groups are frames (see ¶¶ 441, 445: group of frames). With regard to claim 4, D1 teach comprising a step of decoding the group to which each of the plurality of points belongs from encoded attribute data obtained by encoding a value indicating the group to which each of the plurality of points belongs, wherein in the step of specifying the reference values, a reference value corresponding to the decoded group to which each of the plurality of points belongs is specified (see ¶¶ 494-495). With regard to claim 5, D1 teach a step of decoding a frame index and an attribute residual of each of a plurality of points included in merged point cloud data obtained by merging point clouds belonging to different frames from encoded index data obtained by encoding frame indexes indicating the frames to which the points belong and encoded residual data obtained by encoding attribute residuals that are residuals of attribute values with respect to reference values (see ¶¶ 456, 465-466, 494-495: frame index, residuals and reference values); a step of acquiring reference data indicating a correspondence relationship between the frame indexes and the reference values (see ¶¶ 494-495: encoding and decoding of frame index, residuals and reference values); a step of specifying, for each of the plurality of points, a reference value corresponding to the decoded frame index from the reference data; and a step of calculating, for each of the plurality of points, an attribute value from the decoded attribute residual and the specified reference value (see ¶¶ 494-495; see ¶¶ 128, 147, fig. 1: encoding and decoding system). With regard to claim 6, D1 teach a reference specifying unit configured to specify reference values corresponding to a plurality of points (see ¶¶ 456, 465-466, 494-495: frame index, residuals and reference values); a residual decoding unit configured to decode attribute residuals of the plurality of points from encoded residual data obtained by encoding the attribute residuals, the attribute residuals of the plurality of points being residuals of attribute values of the plurality of points with respect to the reference values (see ¶¶ 128, 147, fig. 1, ¶¶ 494-495: encoding and decoding of residual values with respect to reference); and an attribute value calculation unit configured to calculate, for each of the plurality of points, an attribute value of the point from an attribute residual of the point and a reference value corresponding to the point (see ¶¶ 128, 147, 494-495: decoding of attribute values). With regard to claim 7, see discussion of claim 1. With regard to claim 8, D1 teach encoded point cloud data, the encoded point cloud data comprising: encoded residual data obtained by encoding attribute residuals that are residuals of attribute values of a plurality of points with respect to reference values, the encoded residual data being used by a computer for processing of decoding the attribute residuals (see ¶¶ 494-495: encoding residual values with respect to reference; see ¶¶ 128, 147, fig. 1, ¶¶ 494-495: encoding and decoding of residual values with respect to reference); and reference data indicating a correspondence relationship between the plurality of points and the reference values, the reference data being used by the computer for processing of calculating, for each of the plurality of points, an attribute value from an attribute residual and a reference value (see ¶¶ 494-495; see ¶¶ 128, 147, fig. 1, ¶¶ 494-495: encoding and decoding of residual values with respect to reference). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AVINASH YENTRAPATI whose telephone number is (571)270-7982. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sumati Lefkowitz can be reached on (571) 272-3638. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AVINASH YENTRAPATI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2672 1 US Publication No. 2021/0142521.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 22, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 27, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602803
HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY AND METHOD FOR DEPTH PREDICTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12579791
AUTOMATED METHODS FOR GENERATING LABELED BENCHMARK DATA SET OF GEOLOGICAL THIN-SECTION IMAGES FOR MACHINE LEARNING AND GEOSPATIAL ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562264
METHOD FOR THE RECOMPOSITION OF A KIT OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS AND CORRESPONDING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12536646
STRUCTURE DAMAGE CAUSE ESTIMATION SYSTEM, STRUCTURE DAMAGE CAUSE ESTIMATION METHOD, AND STRUCTURE DAMAGE CAUSE ESTIMATION SERVER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12536654
THE SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STOOL IMAGE ANALYSIS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
69%
With Interview (-5.0%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 671 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month