Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/269,517

ALUMINUM ALLOY MEMBER FOR USE IN LASER WELDING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 23, 2023
Priority
Dec 24, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2020048483
Examiner
YANG, JIE
Art Unit
3761
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allowance Rate
789 granted / 1261 resolved
-7.4% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
65 currently pending
Career history
1312
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.1%
+14.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.4%
-27.6% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1261 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This application is a 371 of PCT/JP2020/048483 12/24/2020 DETAILED ACTION The Applicant has elected Invention |I (claims 25-30) for the further prosecution as filed in the response dated 7/27/2026. Claims 16-24 have been withdrawn as non-elected claims; Claims 25-30 remain for Examination, wherein claim 25 is an independent claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 25-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sugimuraet al (US-PG-pub 2021/0339339 A1, listed in IDS filed on 6/23/2023, updated as US 11,745,290 B2, thereafter PG’339) in view of NISHIKAWA YOSUKE et al (JP 2018-168396 A, with on-line translation, filed in IDS dated on 2/16/2024, thereafter JP’396). Regarding claim 25, PG’339 teaches a metal member-welded structure comprising: a Cu member; an Al member; and a welded portion formed by melting and solidifying each of materials of the Cu member and the Al member (Fig.1, claims, and examples of PG’339) with laser welding (par.[0025]-[0026] and [0156] of PG’339), which reads on the claimed welded structure with laser welding including Al alloy member and a welding mate metal member as claimed in the instant claim. PG’339 specify applying Ni plating layer on Al-based member (Fig.2, Par.[0120]-[0121], and claim 8 of PG’339). PG’339 indicates including 1-10 mm thickness of Ni plating layer (par.[0112]-[0113] of PG’339). But PG’339 does not specify the roughness of the Ni plated layer as claimed in the instant claim. JP’396 specify an aluminum alloy onboard bus bar and a production method thereof that can control the increase of contact resistance (abstract of JP’396). JP’396 teaches applying a Ni plating layer on the Al alloy on board bus bar with an arithmetic average surface roughness Sa of 20 nm or more. (Abstract, claims, and par.[0024] of JP’396). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to optimize the roughness of Ni plated layer on Al substrate as demonstrated by JP’396 for the Ni-plated Al member of PG’339 since in order to increase in contact resistance and reduce the costs. (par.[0024] of JP’396). Regarding claim 26, Fig.1 of PG’339 indicates the structure including welded and un-welded portions of members, which reads on the claimed limitation as stated in the instant claim. Regarding claim 27, PG’339 specify that: “The metal member-welded structure is excellent in joining strength between the Cu member and the Al member. A plurality of island portions exist in an area of the welded portion in the vicinity of the surface of the Cu member. Since the island portions contain pure Al, the island portions are relatively high in ductility. This is because the ductility in the vicinity of the surface of the Cu member tends to be high. This is also because the plurality of island portions are distributed in an area of the welded portion in the vicinity of the surface of the Cu member, so that the stress acting on the area in the vicinity of the surface is readily distributed. This is also because the plurality of island portions exist in an area of the welded portion in the vicinity of the surface of the Cu member, so that cracks are less likely to linearly propagate.” Which reads on the claimed plurality of welding mating member and weld portions as claimed in the instant claim. Regarding claim 28, PG’339 teaches a metal member-welded structure comprising: a Cu member; an Al member; and a welded portion formed by melting and solidifying each of materials of the Cu member and the Al member (Fig.1, claims, and examples of PG’339) with laser welding (par.[0025]-[0026] and [0156] of PG’339), which reads on the Cu member as claimed in the instant claim. Regarding claim 29, PG’339 indicates that Metal member-welded structure can be suitably utilized for various types of bus bars and vehicle-mounted battery modules. (par.[0141] of PG’339). Regarding claim 30, PG’339 indicates that any type of laser including YAG laser may be applicable as long as it can melt Al member 3 and Cu member 2 to be welded to each other. (par.[0156] of PG’339). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JIE YANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1884. The examiner can normally be reached IFP. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan J Johnson can be reached on 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JIE YANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 23, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742476
BEARING PART
5y 11m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741344
WELD STRUCTURE, STAINLESS STEEL WELDED STRUCTURE, STAINLESS STEEL WELDED CONTAINER AND STAINLESS STEEL
4y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12741312
COPPER PARTICLES AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12723297
HOT WORK TOOL STEEL AND HOT WORK TOOL
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715026
PROCESSING METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC/ELECTRIC DEVICE COMPONENT WASTE
6y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+19.4%)
3y 5m (~2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1261 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month