Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/270,098

FIRST NODE AND METHODS PERFORMED THEREBY FOR HANDLING ANOMALOUS VALUES

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Examiner
BLAIR, DOUGLAS B
Art Unit
2454
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allow Rate
463 granted / 634 resolved
+15.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
684
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§103
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 634 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/1/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/1/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant’s amendment does not change the scope of the claims because it does not change how “the values” are collected or how they are analyzed. Stating that the values “represent” a RAN KPI for active uplink users in a cellular radio system does not change the actual content of the values. The fact that the “values” my represent a number of users does not change the fact that the technical nature of the values is not defined and the technical nature of the results and how they “enable deployment modifications” is not defined. After reviewing amendments in view the prior art, the applicant’s determining steps (iii) and (iv) where not suggested by the analysis shown in U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2012/0053995 by D’Albis and U.S. Patent Application Publication Number 2017/0208121 by Granshaw. See 4/11/2025 Final Rejection. The Examiner notes that the applicant’s claims do not do anything with these determinations but they are still required to be performed as part of the claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-10 and 12-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea without significantly more. The claim(s) recite(s) mathematical concepts including mathematical calculations that perform statistical analysis of generic data sets. This judicial exception is not integrated into a practical application because the applicant has not disclosed any specific functions that relate to any particular type of data and the statistical analysis only identifies statistical anomalies that are completely independent of the content of the data itself. Page 5, lines 15-18 of the disclosure make it clear that the scope of the invention is not tied to any particular cellular radio technology which is evident from page 6, lines 4-18. Page 6, lines 23-25 reference how the invention applies to “future radio access technologies”. The data that is analyzed it not described in any technical manner other than by stating the values may be indicative of KPI, such as active uplink users. There is no description of what “indicative of” actually means and those of ordinary skill recognize that KPIs could cover any data set related to the operation of any type of cellular radio network. The claim(s) does/do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because although the claims “obtain values” and “provide a result” this is only disclosed as obtaining generic values from a generic cellular device and as a presentation of the statistical analysis but they do not provide a particular solution for altering the actual state of any of the myriad types of networks disclosed. Page 6, line 26-page 7, line 10 describe that any architecture can be used to implement the statistical analysis of the invention and Figure 8 and its corresponding disclosure shown that any generic computer can be used. The final wherein clause of the claim does not provide a practical application based on the result because the applicant does not define “a deployment modification” or how one would be executed. The disclosure merely states that the generic results disclosed by the applicant could be used for determining a deployment modification but any technology describing what that would mean is absent from and beyond the scope of the applicant’s original disclosure. Because all of the claims are directed towards statistical analysis and not any particular computing technology and do not provide a specific result to improve the function of any particular technology, the claims are viewed to cover the judicial exception of an abstract idea without significantly more. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS B BLAIR whose telephone number is (571)272-3893. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Glenton Burgess can be reached at 571-272-3949. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOUGLAS B BLAIR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2454
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 23, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §101
May 28, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 07, 2024
Final Rejection — §101
Aug 08, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 11, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 16, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §101
Mar 20, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 07, 2025
Final Rejection — §101
Jun 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 29, 2025
Final Rejection — §101
Oct 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 01, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598655
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING SESSION BY CONSIDERING BACKHAUL INFORMATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12563127
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHOD AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556421
PARALLEL ONLINE MEETINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12526344
SERVICE LAYER METHODS FOR OFFLOADING IOT APPLICATION MESSAGE GENERATION AND RESPONSE HANDLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12506630
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND USER EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+7.0%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 634 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month