Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/275,041

DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 31, 2023
Examiner
HENRY, CALEB E
Art Unit
2818
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1052 granted / 1217 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1265
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
49.8%
+9.8% vs TC avg
§102
36.3%
-3.7% vs TC avg
§112
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1217 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2, 14, 15, 18 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim (20210193749). PNG media_image1.png 626 844 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 1, Kim teaches an display substrate, comprising: a base substrate (fig. 8: 100); a first display region, located on the base substrate, and comprising M first pixel driving circuits, M first connection holes, N second pixel driving circuits, and N second connection holes (please see fig. 7 and 8 which shows display region, 1A, which has Pm pixels with complementary TFTs and connections holes); a second display region, located on the base substrate, and comprising N anode connection holes (please see fig. 7 and 8 which shows display region, 2A, which has Pa pixels with complementary TFTs and connections holes); and N anode connection lines, connecting the N second connection holes with the N anode connection holes (please see fig. 8 which shows display region which has pixels with complementary TFTs and connections holes and anodes 210 within the connection holes), wherein the second display region is configured to allow light to pass through (as seen in fig. 8, pixels are configured to emit light in the Z direction), the M first connection holes are arranged in one-to-one correspondence with the M first pixel driving circuits (please see fig. 8 which shows display region which has pixels with complementary TFTs and connections holes in one-to-one correspondence with one another), each of the first connection holes is configured to be electrically connected to an output end of a corresponding first pixel driving circuit (please see fig. 8 above), the N second connection holes are arranged in one-to-one correspondence with the N second pixel driving circuits (please see fig. 8 above), each of the second connection holes is configured to be electrically connected to an output end of a corresponding second pixel driving circuit (please see fig. 8 above); the M first pixel driving circuits and the N second pixel driving circuits are arranged in an array on the base substrate, and form pixel driving rows extending along a first direction (X-direction, as seen on compass in fig. 3A), a plurality of pixel driving rows are arranged along a second direction (Y-direction, as seen on compass in fig. 3A) intersecting with the first direction (please see fig. 2, 3A, 7 and 8 which shows TFTs for pixels Pm and Pa, these driving circuits arranged in the Y-direction and X-direction, as seen in compass on fig. 3A); the N anode connection holes form a plurality of anode connection hole rows along a third direction (skewed Z-direction, as seen on compass in fig. 3A and designated by 3rd direction), a plurality of the anode connection holes in each of the anode connection hole rows are arranged along the third direction, the plurality of the anode connection hole rows are arranged along a direction perpendicular to the third direction, an included angle between the third direction and the first direction is less than 90 degrees (please see the intersecting lines, labeled “3rd direction”, above; the labeled lines are not aligned with normal Z axis and are thus oriented less than 90 degrees with the X and Y direction), and both M and N are positive integers greater than or equal to 2 (fig. 3B shows greater than 2 Pm and Pa). Regarding claim 2, Kim teaches an display substrate according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of the anode connection holes in each of the anode connection hole rows are located on a virtual straight line extending along the third direction (please see labeled 3rd direction). Regarding claim 14, Kim teaches an display substrate according to claim 1, further comprising: a pixel driving layer (109), located on the base substrate; and a plurality of planarization layers (113), located on a side of the pixel driving layer away from the base substrate, wherein the first pixel driving circuits and the second pixel driving circuits are located in the pixel driving layer (please see figure above), the first connection holes and the second connection holes at least penetrate through one of the plurality of planarization layers that is closest to the pixel driving layer (please see figure above which shows this arrangment). Regarding claim 15, Kim teaches an display substrate according to claim 14, further comprising: at least one conductive layer between the plurality of the planarization layers, wherein the N anode connection lines are located in the at least one conductive layer (please see figure above). Regarding claim 18, Kim teaches an display substrate according to claim 1, wherein the first display region further comprises M first light-emitting structures, each of the first light-emitting structures comprises a first anode, the M first anodes of the M first light-emitting structures are electrically connected with output ends of the M first pixel driving circuits through the M first connection holes; and the second display region further comprises N second light-emitting structures, each of the second light-emitting structures comprises a second anode, the N second anodes of the N second light-emitting structures are electrically connected with output ends of the N second pixel driving circuits through the N anode connection holes, the N anode connection lines and the N second connection holes (please see figure above, as well as rejection of claim 1). Regarding claim 20, Kim teaches an display device, comprising the display substrate according to claim 1 (please see figure 1). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 (please note dependency) is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim 4 (please note dependency) is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 5-13 are objected to based on their dependence on claim 4. Claim 16 (please note dependency) is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 17 are objected to based on their dependence on claim 16. Claim 19 (please note dependency) is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CALEB E HENRY whose telephone number is (571)270-5370. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eva Montalvo can be reached at (571) 270-3829. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CALEB E HENRY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2818
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 31, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604596
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER AND A PEROVSKITE SOLAR CELL WITH AN IMPROVED HOLE TRANSPORT LAYER MANUFACTURED BY THE SAME METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604650
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT AND LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE USING PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY TECHNIQUE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598801
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE OF PHYSICAL UNCLONABLE FUNCTION AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588440
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS FOR ETCHING USING OXDIZATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584068
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT, ORGANIC ELECTRIC ELEMENT USING THE SAME, AND AN ELECTRONIC DEVICE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+6.2%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1217 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month