Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/276,558

CATHETERS AND SYSTEMS FOR DIRECT INJECTION OF GAS-ENRICHED LIQUID INTO A PATIENT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 09, 2023
Examiner
AHMED, TASNIM M
Art Unit
3783
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Zoll Circulation Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
342 granted / 427 resolved
+10.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
459
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
29.9%
-10.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.9%
-18.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 427 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description: 606 (Figs. 6A-6C). Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 22, 24, 26, 27, 29, 31, and 80-85 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hochareon (US 2012/0302995) in view of Myrick et al (US 2018/0207592). Regarding claim 1, Hochareon discloses: A catheter (220; Fig. 11A) configured to be inserted into a vasculature of a patient (Abstract), wherein the catheter (220) comprises: a catheter body (220), a first lumen (2) extending through the catheter body (220), wherein the first lumen (2) is configured to be in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient (Fig. 11A) when the catheter (220) is inserted into the vasculature of the patient (Fig. 11A), and the first lumen (2) is configured to perform at least one of receiving a sample of blood from the vasculature of the patient (¶0087 – “receiving venous drainage flow”) or measuring a parameter of blood of the patient; one or more second lumens (1) extending through the catheter body, wherein the one or more second lumens are configured to receive a gas enriched liquid from a gas enriched liquid source (¶0062, ¶0090 – oxygenated perfusate); wherein the catheter body (220) is configured to position the one or more second lumens (1) such that the stream of the gas enriched liquid intersect and mix with the blood of the patient in a region beyond an end of the catheter body (220) and beyond the first lumen (2) (Fig. 11A). Hochareon is silent regarding “two or more capillaries extending from the catheter body and coupled to the one or more second lumens,” “wherein each of the two or more capillaries are in fluid communication with the one or more second lumens and are in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient when the catheter is inserted into the vasculature of the patient,” “wherein each of the two or more capillaries are configured to receive the gas enriched liquid from the one or more second lumens and to simultaneously dispense respective streams of the gas enriched liquid directly into the vasculature of the patient,” and “wherein the catheter body is configured to position the two or more capillaries at one or more predetermined angles relative to one another.” However, Myrick teaches a catheter (500; Fig. 2A) comprising a plurality of capillaries (10, 11; Fig. 2B) that are in fluid communication with a lumen (40; Fig. 5A) configured to receive a gas enriched liquid from a gas enriched liquid source (¶0028) and the vasculature of the patient in order to mix gas-enriched liquid with the bodily liquid (¶0028). Myrick further teaches that the capillaries (10, 11) are configured to receive the gas enriched liquid and simultaneously dispense the streams of liquid directly into the vasculature of the patient at a predetermined angle (α; Fig. 1). Myrick teaches that this arrangement forms an efficient mixing zone while minimizing or eliminating clinically significant bubbles during gas enrichment in the vessel (¶0037, 0038). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to have modified the device of Hochareon to incorporate the capillaries of Myrick in order to provide sufficient structure to minimize or eliminate clinically significant bubbles during gas enrichment in the vessel, as recognized by Myrick. Regarding claim 4, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The catheter of claim 1, further comprising a pressure sensor (¶0071 – pressure sensor) disposed within the first lumen (2; ¶0071 – sensor can be disposed in line 66 in Fig. 3, which is equivalent to the venous drainage line 2 of Fig. 11A), wherein the pressure sensor is configured to obtain one or more pressure measurements (¶0071). Regarding claim 5, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The catheter of claim 1, wherein the parameter of the blood of the patient is at least one of: a partial pressure of oxygen of the blood of the patient, SO2 of the blood of the patient, a pressure of the blood of the patient (¶0071, 0094, 0097 – pressure in the system is taken into consideration, using a pressure sensor), a flow rate of the of the blood of the patient, or a temperature of the of the blood of the patient (¶0071, 0094, 0097 – temperature of the perfusion flow manages temperature of the blood). Regarding claim 7, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The catheter of claim 1, wherein the catheter (220) comprises: a third lumen (3) extending through the catheter body (220), wherein the third lumen (220) is configured to be in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient (Fig. 11A) when the catheter (220) is inserted into the vasculature of the patient (the third lumen 3 is fully capable of performing at least one of receiving an additional sample of the blood of the patient from the vasculature of the patient and or measuring an additional parameter of the blood of the patient, such as by monitoring the temperature within line 3 to ensure the temperature of the excess flow is as required). Regarding claim 22, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The catheter of claim 1, further comprising one or more sensors (¶0094), wherein the one or more sensors are configured such that the one or more sensors are in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient when the catheter (220) is inserted into the vasculature of the patient (¶0071 – sensor can be disposed in line 66 in Fig. 3, which is equivalent to the venous drainage line 2 of Fig. 11A, putting it in fluid communication with the patient vessel). Regarding claim 24, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The catheter of claim 1, further comprising a self-centering device (230; balloon 230 is fully capable of centering the catheter body 220 within the vasculature of the patient). Regarding claim 26, Hochareon discloses: A system (Fig. 11A) comprising: a catheter body (220), a first lumen (2) extending through the catheter body (220), wherein the first lumen (2) is configured to be in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient (Fig. 11A) when the catheter (220) is inserted into the vasculature of the patient (Fig. 11A), and the first lumen (2) is configured to perform at least one of receiving a sample of blood from the vasculature of the patient (¶0087 – “receiving venous drainage flow”) or measuring a parameter of blood of the patient; one or more second lumens (1) extending through the catheter body, wherein the one or more second lumens are configured to receive a gas enriched liquid from a gas enriched liquid source (¶0062 – oxygenated perfusate); wherein the catheter body (220) is configured to position the one or more second lumens (1) such that the stream of the gas enriched liquid intersect and mix with the blood of the patient in a region beyond an end of the catheter body (220) and beyond the first lumen (2) (Fig. 11A); and a fluid dispensing device (310; Fig. 15) in fluid communication with the one or more second lumens (1) (¶0107), wherein the fluid dispensing device (310) comprises one or more pumps (318) configured to provide the gas enriched liquid to the one or more second lumens (1) (¶0114). Hochareon is silent regarding “two or more capillaries extending from the catheter body and coupled to the one or more second lumens,” “wherein each of the two or more capillaries are in fluid communication with the one or more second lumens and are in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient when the catheter is inserted into the vasculature of the patient,” “wherein each of the two or more capillaries are configured to receive the gas enriched liquid from the one or more second lumens and to simultaneously dispense respective streams of the gas enriched liquid directly into the vasculature of the patient,” and “wherein the catheter body is configured to position the two or more capillaries at one or more predetermined angles relative to one another.” However, Myrick teaches a catheter (500; Fig. 2A) comprising a plurality of capillaries (10, 11; Fig. 2B) that are in fluid communication with a lumen (40; Fig. 5A) configured to receive a gas enriched liquid from a gas enriched liquid source (¶0028) and the vasculature of the patient in order to mix gas-enriched liquid with the bodily liquid (¶0028). Myrick further teaches that the capillaries (10, 11) are configured to receive the gas enriched liquid and simultaneously dispense the streams of liquid directly into the vasculature of the patient at a predetermined angle (α; Fig. 1). Myrick teaches that this arrangement forms an efficient mixing zone while minimizing or eliminating clinically significant bubbles during gas enrichment in the vessel (¶0037, 0038). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to have modified the device of Hochareon to incorporate the capillaries of Myrick in order to provide sufficient structure to minimize or eliminate clinically significant bubbles during gas enrichment in the vessel, as recognized by Myrick. Regarding claim 27, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The system of claim 26, further comprising one or more connectors (connection in diagram of Fig. 15 is a connector) configured to couple the one or more second lumens (1) to one or more respective dispensing ports (end of pump 318) of the fluid dispensing device (310). Regarding claim 29, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The system of claim 26, wherein the gas enriched liquid comprises one or more of oxygen (¶0062 - oxygen), ozone, inert gas, nitrogen, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, or air. Regarding claim 31, Hochareon discloses: A system (Fig. 11A) comprising: a catheter body (220), a first lumen (2) extending through the catheter body (220), wherein the first lumen (2) is configured to be in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient (Fig. 11A) when the catheter (220) is inserted into the vasculature of the patient (Fig. 11A), and the first lumen (2) is configured to perform at least one of receiving a sample of blood from the vasculature of the patient (¶0087 – “receiving venous drainage flow”) or measuring a parameter of blood of the patient; one or more second lumens (1) extending through the catheter body, wherein the one or more second lumens are configured to receive a gas enriched liquid from a gas enriched liquid source (¶0062 – oxygenated perfusate); wherein the catheter body (220) is configured to position the one or more second lumens (1) such that the stream of the gas enriched liquid intersect and mix with the blood of the patient in a region beyond an end of the catheter body (220) and beyond the first lumen (2) (Fig. 11A); and a blood sampling device (320; Fig. 16) in fluid communication with the first lumen (2), wherein the blood sampling device (320) is configured to withdraw the sample of the blood of the patient from the vasculature of the patient through the first lumen (2) (¶0099). Hochareon is silent regarding “two or more capillaries extending from the catheter body and coupled to the one or more second lumens,” “wherein each of the two or more capillaries are in fluid communication with the one or more second lumens and are in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient when the catheter is inserted into the vasculature of the patient,” “wherein each of the two or more capillaries are configured to receive the gas enriched liquid from the one or more second lumens and to simultaneously dispense respective streams of the gas enriched liquid directly into the vasculature of the patient,” and “wherein the catheter body is configured to position the two or more capillaries at one or more predetermined angles relative to one another.” However, Myrick teaches a catheter (500; Fig. 2A) comprising a plurality of capillaries (10, 11; Fig. 2B) that are in fluid communication with a lumen (40; Fig. 5A) configured to receive a gas enriched liquid from a gas enriched liquid source (¶0028) and the vasculature of the patient in order to mix gas-enriched liquid with the bodily liquid (¶0028). Myrick further teaches that the capillaries (10, 11) are configured to receive the gas enriched liquid and simultaneously dispense the streams of liquid directly into the vasculature of the patient at a predetermined angle (α; Fig. 1). Myrick teaches that this arrangement forms an efficient mixing zone while minimizing or eliminating clinically significant bubbles during gas enrichment in the vessel (¶0037, 0038). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to have modified the device of Hochareon to incorporate the capillaries of Myrick in order to provide sufficient structure to minimize or eliminate clinically significant bubbles during gas enrichment in the vessel, as recognized by Myrick. Regarding claim 80, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The system of claim 26, further comprising a pressure sensor (¶0071 – pressure sensor) disposed within the first lumen (2; ¶0071 – sensor can be disposed in line 66 in Fig. 3, which is equivalent to the venous drainage line 2 of Fig. 11A), wherein the pressure sensor is configured to obtain one or more pressure measurements (¶0071). Regarding claim 81, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The system of claim 26, wherein the parameter of the blood of the patient is at least one of: a partial pressure of oxygen of the blood of the patient, SO2 of the blood of the patient, a pressure of the blood of the patient (¶0071, 0094, 0097 – pressure in the system is taken into consideration, using a pressure sensor), a flow rate of the of the blood of the patient, or a temperature of the of the blood of the patient (¶0071, 0094, 0097 – temperature of the perfusion flow manages temperature of the blood). Regarding claim 82, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The system of claim 26, wherein the catheter (220) comprises: a third lumen (3) extending through the catheter body (220), wherein the third lumen (220) is configured to be in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient (Fig. 11A) when the catheter (220) is inserted into the vasculature of the patient (the third lumen 3 is fully capable of performing at least one of receiving an additional sample of the blood of the patient from the vasculature of the patient and or measuring an additional parameter of the blood of the patient, such as by monitoring the temperature within line 3 to ensure the temperature of the excess flow is as required). Regarding claim 83, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The catheter of claim 26, further comprising one or more sensors (¶0094), wherein the one or more sensors are configured such that the one or more sensors are in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient when the catheter (220) is inserted into the vasculature of the patient (¶0071 – sensor can be disposed in line 66 in Fig. 3, which is equivalent to the venous drainage line 2 of Fig. 11A, putting it in fluid communication with the patient vessel). Regarding claim 84, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The catheter of claim 31, wherein the parameter of the blood of the patient is at least one of: a partial pressure of oxygen of the blood of the patient, SO2 of the blood of the patient, a pressure of the blood of the patient (¶0071, 0094, 0097 – pressure in the system is taken into consideration, using a pressure sensor), a flow rate of the of the blood of the patient, or a temperature of the of the blood of the patient (¶0071, 0094, 0097 – temperature of the perfusion flow manages temperature of the blood). Regarding claim 85, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses: The catheter of claim 31, further comprising one or more sensors (¶0094), wherein the one or more sensors are configured such that the one or more sensors are in fluid communication with the vasculature of the patient when the catheter (220) is inserted into the vasculature of the patient (¶0071 – sensor can be disposed in line 66 in Fig. 3, which is equivalent to the venous drainage line 2 of Fig. 11A, putting it in fluid communication with the patient vessel). Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hochareon in view of Myrick further in view of Dabrowiak et al (US 2013/0079859). Regarding claim 19, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses the catheter of claim 1 but is silent regarding “wherein at least one capillary comprises a fiducial marking.” However, Dabrowiak teaches a catheter (Abstract), thus being in the same field of endeavor, that uses a marker band on its distal portion (¶0044). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to have modified the capillaries of Myrick to incorporate the marker of Dabrowiak in order to provide sufficient structure to visualize the device within the patient. Claim 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hochareon in view of Myrick further in view of Salzman et al (US 5423320). Regarding claim 23, Hochareon in view of Myrick discloses the catheter of claim 22 but is silent regarding “wherein at least one of the one or more sensors is an oxygen partial pressure (pO2) sensor.” However, Salzman teaches a catheter (Abstract), thus being in the same field of endeavor, with an oxygen partial pressure sensor (Col. 6:12-20) in order to measure the partial pressure at the location within the patient during the therapy (Col. 6:12-20). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date to have modified the device of Hochareon to incorporate the partial pressure sensor of Salzman in order to provide sufficient structure to monitor the oxygenation at the therapy site during use of the device, as recognized by Salzman. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 9-10 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TASNIM M AHMED whose telephone number is (571)272-9536. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-5pm Pacific time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Bhisma Mehta can be reached at (571)272-3383. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TASNIM MEHJABIN AHMED/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599722
SYRINGE HOLDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599727
Syringe with Suction-Based Automatic Disabling
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594383
LOCK MECHANISM FOR A MEDICAMENT DELIVERY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594380
Medication Injector Assembly And Method Of Use
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12564689
INJECTION DEVICE AND COMPONENTS THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.4%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 427 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month