Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/276,787

HETEROGENEOUS SOLDER BUMP STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Aug 10, 2023
Examiner
OWENS, DOUGLAS W
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Societe De Commercialisation Des Produits De La Recherche Appliquée Socpra Sciences Et Génie S.E.C.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allow Rate
265 granted / 328 resolved
+12.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
357
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
35.8%
-4.2% vs TC avg
§102
36.8%
-3.2% vs TC avg
§112
18.0%
-22.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 328 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The abstract of the disclosure is objected to because The abstract of the disclosure does not commence on a separate sheet in accordance with 37 CFR 1.52(b)(4) and 1.72(b). A new abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. A corrected abstract of the disclosure is required and must be presented on a separate sheet, apart from any other text. See MPEP § 608.01(b). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 3, 5, 6, 10, and 14 – 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)/(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Patent No. 5,130,779 to Agarwala et al. Regarding claim 1, Agarwala et al. teach a solder bump structure comprising: an under bump metallurgy (UBM) layer (14); a first solder portion (16) over the UBM layer, the first solder portion having a first composition; a barrier layer (18) encapsulating the first solder portion; and a second solder portion (26) over the barrier layer, the second solder portion having a second composition different from the first composition (Col. 10, lines 37-43). Regarding claim 2, Agarwala et al. teach a solder bump structure, wherein the first solder portion has an upper surface, at least one side surface, and a lower surface positioned over the UBM layer, the barrier layer encapsulating at least part of the upper surface and the at least one side surface of the first solder portion. See Figs. 3 and 4. Regarding claim 3, Agarwala et al. teach a solder bump structure, wherein the barrier layer is configured to limit diffusion of material between the first solder portion and the second solder portion during multiple reflowing of the bump structure (Col. 5, lines 56 – 62). Regarding claim 5, Agarwala et al. teach a solder bump structure, wherein the second solder portion exhibits a substantially hemispherical shape after a first reflowing of the bump structure (Col. 11, lines 64 – 68). Regarding claim 6, Agarwala et al. teach a solder bump structure, wherein the barrier layer restrains the first solder portion to a substantially cylindrical shape during multiple reflowing of the bump structure (Col. 10, lines 22 – 27). Regarding claim 10, Agarwala et al. teach a solder bump, wherein the barrier layer comprise a layer of nickel (Ni) (Col. 13, lines 62 – 65). Regarding claim 14, Agarwala et al. teach a solder bump, wherein the UBM layer is configured to be deposited over an integrated circuit (IC) chip (Col. 9, lines 25 – 33) and the second solder portion is configured to form a solder joint with a substrate for interconnecting the IC chip and the substrate and forming a flip-chip assembly (Col. 16, lines 21 – 25). Regarding claim 15, Agarwala et al. teach a method for manufacturing a solder bump structure, the method comprising: depositing an under bump metallurgy (UBM) layer (14) over an integrated circuit (IC) chip (Col. 9, lines 25 – 33); depositing a first solder layer (16) over the UBM layer, the first solder layer having a first composition; depositing a barrier layer (18) that encapsulates the first solder portion; and depositing at least one second solder layer over the barrier layer, the at least one second solder layer having a second composition different from the first composition (Col. 10, lines 37-43). Regarding claim 16, Agarwala et al. teach a method, wherein the barrier layer is deposited to encapsulate at least part of an upper surface and at least one side surface of the first solder layer. See Figs. 3 and 4. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 7 – 9, 11, 12, 17, 19, 20, 22, and 23 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent No. 6,501,185 to Chow et al. teach a solder structure including a conductive structure with a barrier layer encapsulation and a solder portion over the barrier layer. Chow et al. do not teach the first solder portion. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS W OWENS whose telephone number is (571)272-1662. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 5:30-1:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached at 571-270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DOUGLAS W. OWENS, Esq. Primary Patent Examiner Art Unit 2897 /DOUGLAS W OWENS/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 10, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Mar 31, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593716
SUBSTRATE ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588538
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE HAVING WIRED UNDER BUMP STRUCTURE AND METHOD THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12581937
INTEGRATED DEVICE COMPRISING METALLIZATION INTERCONNECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564085
MICROELECTRONIC ASSEMBLY WITH UNDERFILL FLOW CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12563882
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+1.7%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 328 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month