Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/281,079

COATING AGENT MANUFACTURING KIT, COATING AGENT, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING ELECTRONIC SUBSTRATE AND ELECTRONIC COMPONENT MODULE

Non-Final OA §Other
Filed
Sep 08, 2023
Priority
Mar 11, 2021 — JP 2021-039341 +3 more
Examiner
TSO, STANLEY
Art Unit
2847
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sekisui Chemical Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
386 granted / 511 resolved
+7.5% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
537
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
53.7%
+13.7% vs TC avg
§102
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.1%
-23.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 511 resolved cases

Office Action

§Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/21/2026 has been entered. Objections The amended drawings filed 8/21/2026 are objected to under 35 U.S.C. 132 (a) because it introduces new matter into the disclosure. 35 U.S.C. 132 (a) states that no amendment shall introduce new matter into the disclosure of the invention. The added material which is not supported by the original disclosure is as follows: Figs. 3B, 3C, 3D, and 4-7 are objected to under 35 U.S.C. 132 (a) because it introduces new matter into the disclosure. Regarding Fig. 3B, reproduced below, annotated, the hollow particles in the coating film 4 have a higher quantity of particles in the inclined portion of the coating film 4 as compared to the level portion of the coating film 4. Furthermore, the hollow particles in Fig. 3B have different shapes, for example, some hollow particles are depicted as having a spherical shape, while other hollow particles are depicted as having a partial spherical shape and a partial flat shape. This was not disclosed in Applicant’s specification as originally filed. Figs. 3C, 3D, and 4-7 illustrate similar characteristics. PNG media_image1.png 760 988 media_image1.png Greyscale Additional examples of new matter that are introduced by the Figures include Fig. 3C, the ratio of hollow particles in the level portion of the coating film 4 has a 2-1 ratio between the upper film and the lower film, whereas the ratio is 1-1 for the inclined portion of the coating film 4. This was not disclosed in the specification as originally filed. Figs. 3D and 4-7 illustrate similar characteristics. Furthermore, Fig. 3C, 3D, 4 and 6-7 shows that the level portion of the lower coating film 4 has a single layer of particles, whereas the level portion of the upper coating film 4 has multiple layers of particles. Figs. 6-7 shows the hollow particles in the upper film and lower film are aligned in a plane that is perpendicular to the lower surface of the lower film, whereas the balloon particles are similarly aligned throughout the inclined portion of the upper and lower films, but the balloon particles are not aligned throughout the level portion of the upper and lower films. Figs. 6-7 also shows that the hollow particles and the balloon particles are alternately disposed in a direction parallel to the lower surface of the lower film. Figs. 6-7 also shows that the balloon particles are disposed towards the lower portions of the inclined portion of the lower and upper films, and the hollow particles are disposed towards the upper portions of the lower and upper films of the inclined portion. None of these attributes are disclosed in the specification as originally filed. For the reasons discussed above, Figs. 3B, 3C, 3D, and 4-7 are objected to under 35 U.S.C. 132 (a) because it introduces new matter into the disclosure. Applicant is required to cancel the new matter in the reply to this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STANLEY TSO whose telephone number is (571)270-0723. The examiner can normally be reached Tu-Thurs 6am-6pm, alt M 6am-2pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Tim Thompson can be reached at 571-272-2342. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STANLEY TSO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2847
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 16 earlier events
Jul 01, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 30, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 21, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 24, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §Other
Sep 25, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12750954
ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12750948
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CIRCUIT BOARD
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12745351
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745346
STRETCHABLE DEVICE
2y 0m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12745348
WIRING BOARD
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.3%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 511 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month