Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/281,445

SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUS AND FORMING METHOD FOR FERROELECTRIC THIN FILM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 11, 2023
Examiner
MARUF, SHEIKH
Art Unit
2897
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Tokyo Institute of Technology
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allow Rate
469 granted / 541 resolved
+18.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
571
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
66.4%
+26.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.9%
-23.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.1%
-29.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 541 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Claims 7-11 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected Group-II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 02/17/2026. The reason explained in restriction requirements is how Hf can be deposited with a simpler process other than ECR sputtering process as explained. So, the restriction requirement is proper. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Shun-Ichiro OHMI et al. (In-Situ N2-Plasma Nitridation for High-k HfN Gate Insulator Formed by Electron Cyclotron Resonance " IEICE TRANS” 20.06.06.) hereinafter OHMI, in view of OHMI (and people skilled in the art). Regarding claim 1, OHMI teaches a semiconductor apparatus ((left column of page 299, Figs, 2, 3, etc.) comprising: a Si substrate; and a ferroelectric thin film formed on the Si substrate(100) and including HfNX (1 < x) having a rhombohedral crystal structure. OHMI does not explicitly teach that HfN1.1 or HfNx (1<x) is a ferroelectric thin film having a rhombohedral crystal structure. However, Figure 4 of OHMI, Fig. 4 shows the change of hysteresis width as a function of nitridation pressure. Since the hysteresis width is related to the strength of ferroelectricity, the HfN1.1 or HfNx(1<x) of OHMI is ferroelectric, and a person skilled in the art would be able to determine that the HfNx(1<x) of OHMI is ferroelectric. 1 of the recited invention 1 having the same or similar material composition as HfNx(1<x). 1.1 or HfNx(1<x) having the same or similar material composition as HfNx(1<x) of claim 1, it is easy to derive the crystal structure of the rhombohedral crystal system. The crystal structure of the rhombohedral crystal system can be easily derived from HfN1.1 or HfNx (1<x) of the cited invention 1, which has the same or similar material composition. Hence, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use OHMI’s semiconductor apparatus with other teaching from OHMI as known to people skilled in the art in order to meet device functionality by improving the electrical characteristics. Regarding claim 2, OHMI teach the semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1, wherein 1.1 ≤ x ≤1.3 holds true (TheHfN1.1 initial layer improves the interface property, and HfN1.3 layer increases the dielectric constant). Also, this can be easily derived by a person skilled in the art in order to meet device to operate efficiently. Regarding claim 3, OHMI teaches the semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1, wherein 1.15 ≤ x ≤ 1.2 holds true (TheHfN1.1 initial layer improves the interface property, and HfN1.3 layer increases the dielectric constant). Also, this can be easily derived by a person skilled in the art in order to meet device to operate efficiently. Regarding claim 4, OHMI teaches the semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising an SiO2 layer formed outside an active region in which the semiconductor device is formed (Fig. 3, etc.). Regarding claim 5, OHMI teaches the semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1, comprising: a contact layer including HfNy (y < 1) formed on the ferroelectric thin film; and a metal electrode (Al) formed on the contact layer (Fig. 3, etc. HfN0.5 and Al disclosed can be easily derived. The addition and limitation of HfN0.5 and Al). Regarding claim 6, OHMI teaches the semiconductor apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the ferroelectric thin film has a thickness of 3 nm to 20 nm (HfN1.1 with a thickness of 3.4 nm in Fig. 1, etc.). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See form PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHEIKH MARUF whose telephone number is (571)270-1903. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-6pm EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chad Dicke can be reached on 571-270-7996. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHEIKH MARUF/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2897
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 11, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604479
TWO TRANSISTOR CAPACITORLESS MEMORY CELL WITH STACKED THIN-FILM TRANSISTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604499
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES WITH EMBEDDED FERROELECTRIC FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604625
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12575111
BACK-END-OF-LINE 2D MEMORY CELL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12568639
INSULATED GATE POWER DEVICE WITH EPITAXIALLY GROWN SUBSTRATE LAYERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+10.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 541 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month