Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/281,941

PROCESSING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Sep 13, 2023
Priority
Mar 23, 2021 — JP 2021-048841 +1 more
Examiner
NEIBAUR, ROBERT F
Art Unit
3723
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Tokyo Seimitsu Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
294 granted / 383 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+31.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
409
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.0%
+9.0% vs TC avg
§102
22.3%
-17.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.3%
-12.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 383 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 07/20/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 07/20/2026 has been entered. Claim 2 is canceled. Claim(s) 1 and 3 remain pending and have been examined below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Asai (US Patent No. 11,398,400) in view of Yamanaka et al (Japanese Patent Publication No. JP2015131354) as evidenced by the machine translation of Yamanaka, hereinafter referred to as Asai and Yamanaka, respectively. Regarding claims 1 (Currently Amended) and Claim 3 (Previously Presented), Asai discloses a processing apparatus [Asai, fig 1, 1] that flattens a workpiece [Asai, fig 1, 10] with a grinding stone [Asai, fig 1, 426], the processing apparatus comprising: a suction member capable of suction-holding the workpiece [Asai, fig 2, 321]; an attachment [Asai, fig 2, 322] that is provided on an outer periphery side of the suction member [Asai, fig 2, 322 is on the side of 321], to be detachably attached to a chuck table that accommodates the suction member [Asai, fig 2, showing that 321 is placed within 322b], and the suction member is made of a material that can be ground [Asai, col 4, lines 21-28, 321 can be made of a porous material] and (the attachment) can contact the grinding stone during self-grinding for grinding the suction member [Asai, figs 3-3a, showing that the top surface of 322a and 321 are co-planar], and wherein the attachment is configured to be removed from the suction member and to be changeable a position relative to the suction member [Asai, fig 2, because 322 is bolted through 8 to 34, 322 can be unbolted and repositioned, and further since 321 can be independently placed, 321 can also be independently removed, thus the angular relationship between 322 and 321 is capable of being changed relative to each other]. Asai does not explicitly disclose the attachment is composed of a material harder to grind than the suction member (clm 1), and wherein the workpiece is formed in a non- circular shape (clm 3). Yamanaka teaches a processing apparatus that flattens a workpiece with a grinding stone [Yamanaka, fig 1, 1 which process W with 13], the processing apparatus comprising: a suction member capable of suction-holding the workpiece [Yamanaka, fig 2A, 26 which is capable of holding W]; an attachment [Yamanaka, fig 2A, 28] that is provided on an outer periphery side of the suction member [Yamanaka, fig 1, showing that 27 is held within 28 such that an outer periphery of 28 is around 27], is composed of a material harder to grind than the suction member [Yamanaka, page 14, pp 0025 28 is harder than 26], and can contact the grinding stone during self-grinding for grinding the suction member [Yamanaka, page 17, pp 0029, 27 and 29 are the same height, where 29 is the top surface of 28] (clm 1), and wherein the workpiece is formed in a non- circular shape [Yamanaka, fig 2A, 26 is rectangularly shaped and operates with a rectangular workpiece of W] (clm 3). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have made the attachment member of Asai to be composed of a material harder to grind than the suction member as taught by Yamanaka because the shape of the suction member and shape of the receiving area for the suction member in the attachment is essential to achieving an even grinding load between and the same heights during self-grinding [Yamanaka 1, pages 18-19, pp’s 0030 – 0031, summarized]. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yamanaka (Japanese Patent Publication No. JP2012033640) teaches a processing apparatus [Yamanaka 2, fig 1] that flattens a workpiece with a grinding stone [Yamanaka 2, fig 1, W is flattened by 3 and/or 4]. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT NEIBAUR whose telephone number is (571)270-7979. The examiner can normally be reached M - F 8:00 am - 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Posigian can be reached at 313-446-6546. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT F NEIBAUR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 13, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jan 23, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746649
V-CLAMP TOOL APPARATUS AND METHOD OF USE
6y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746638
RETAINER RING, CHEMICAL MECHANICAL POLISHING APPARATUS, AND SUBSTRATE POLISHING METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12746634
ROAD-RAIL DUAL PURPOSE QUICK DISASSEMBLY AND ASSEMBLY TYPE RAIL GRINDING MAINTENANCE ROBOT
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12722252
MACHINING TOOL FOR GRINDING A WORKPIECE
7y 2m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12715160
MACHINING SEGMENT FOR A MACHINING TOOL
5y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+31.6%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 383 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month