Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/283,662

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Sep 22, 2023
Examiner
MOJADDEDI, OMAR F
Art Unit
2898
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
90%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 90% — above average
90%
Career Allow Rate
448 granted / 500 resolved
+21.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
538
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
50.1%
+10.1% vs TC avg
§102
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§112
20.3%
-19.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 500 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Status of Claims 1. Applicant's submittal of claims 1, 10, 12, 14-15, 18-19, 22-33, and 40 in the “Claims” filed on 09/22/2023 is acknowledged and entered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Notes: when present, semicolon separated fields within the parenthesis (; ;) represent, for example, as (100; Fig 3A; [0063]) = (element 100; Figure No. 3A; Paragraph No. [0063]). For brevity, the texts “Element”, “Figure No.” and “Paragraph No.” shall be excluded, though; additional clarification notes may be added within each field. The number of fields may be fewer or more than three indicated above. These conventions are used throughout this document. 2. Claims 1 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kashiwabara (US 20030178621 A1; hereinafter Kashiwabara). Regarding claim 1, Kashiwabara teaches a system (see the entire document, specifically Fig. 1(a)+; [0085+], and as cited below), comprising: forming a first light-emitting layer (14; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0111, 0121]) configured to emit light in a first color (see [0121]; blue) in at least a first region on a substrate (11; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0111, 0121]) by using a first solution including a first light-emitting material and a first solvent (see [0110-0111, 0102-0104, 0122-0123]); and forming a second light-emitting layer (18; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0121]) configured to emit light in a second color (see [0121]; green) different from the first color(see [0121]; blue) in at least a second region (see Fig. 2(n)) different from the first region (see Fig. 2(n)) on the substrate (11; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0121]) by using a second solution including a second light-emitting material and a second solvent (see [0112-0116, 0122-0123]) in which a solubility of the first light-emitting material is less than a solubility of the first light-emitting material in the first solvent (see [0102-0104, 0110-0111, 0122-0123]), the forming a second tight-emitting layer (18; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0121]) being performed after the forming a first light-emitting layer (14; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0121]), wherein the first light-emitting layer (18; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0121]) and the second light-emitting layer (14; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0121]) emit light in different regions (see Fig. 2(n)). Regarding claim 10, Kashiwabara teaches all of the features of claim 1. Kashiwabara further teaches wherein the first light-emitting layer (14; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0121]) in the first region (see Fig. 2(n)) is included in a first subpixel, the second light-emitting layer (18; Figs. 2(a)-2(n); see [0110-0121]) in the second region (see Fig. 2(n)) is included in a second subpixel, the first subpixel and the second subpixel are included in one pixel of a display region (see [0028, 0034, 0156, 0162]), wherein the first solution (see [0103, 0104, 0110-0111, 0121]) includes a photosensitive resin, and the second solution (see [0103, 0104, 0112-0116, 0121]) does not include a photosensitive resin. Allowable Subject Matter 3. Claim 12 (and claims dependent upon claim 12, namely claim 14-15, 18-19, and 22-33) is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form, and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: A search of the prior art failed to disclose or reasonably suggest the limitations “forming a third light-emitting layer configured to emit light in a third color different from the first color and the second color in at least a third region different from the first region and the second region on the substrate by using a third solution including a third light-emitting material and a third solvent in which a solubility of the second light-emitting material is less than a solubility of the second light-emitting material in the second solvent, the forming a third light-emitting layer being performed after the forming a second light-emitting layer, wherein the third light-emitting layer emits light in a region different from regions of the first light-emitting layer and the second light-emitting layer” of claim 12 (the individual limitations may be found just not in combination). Allowable Subject Matter 4. Claim 40 is allowable. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: A search of the prior art failed to disclose or reasonably suggest the limitations of claim 40 (the individual limitations may be found just not in combination). Regarding Claim 40: this is allowable, because, the references of the Prior Art of record and considered pertinent to the applicant's disclosure, and the examiner’s knowledge does not teach or render obvious, at least to the skilled artisan, the instant invention regarding: “a first light-emitting material, the first light-emitting layer being configured to emit light in a first color, a second light-emitting layer including a second light-emitting material, the second light-emitting layer being configured to emit light in a second color different from the first color, and a third light-emitting layer including a third light-emitting material, the third light-emitting layer being configured to emit light in a third color different from the first color and the second color, wherein the first light-emitting layer and the second light-emitting layer are in contact with each other, one of the first light-emitting material and the second light-emitting material is a polar molecule, the other of the first light-emitting material and the second light-emitting material is a non-polar molecule, the first light-emitting layer and the second light-emitting layer emit light in different regions, the third light-emitting layer is in contact with the second light emitting layer, the first light-emitting material and the third light-emitting material are one of a polar molecule and anon-polar molecule, the second light-emitting material is the other of the polar molecule and the non-polar molecule, the first light-emitting layer is included in a first subpixel, the second light-emitting layer is included in a second subpixel, the third light-emitting layer is included in a third subpixel, and the first subpixel, the second subpixel, and the third subpixel are included in one pixel of a display region”, as recited in Claim 40, in combination with the remaining limitations of the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Omar Mojaddedi whose telephone number is 313-446-6582. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday – Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julio J. Maldonado, can be reached on 571-272-1864. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OMAR F MOJADDEDI/Examiner, Art Unit 2898
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 22, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602900
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENABLED PREPARATION END-POINTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598760
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593683
STRUCTURE WITH INDUCTOR EMBEDDED IN BONDED SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATES AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588508
PACKAGE COMPRISING A LID STRUCTURE WITH A COMPARTMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12588225
IC INCLUDING CAPACITOR HAVING SEGMENTED BOTTOM PLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
90%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.5%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 500 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month