Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/285,098

SELECTIVE REPORTING OF TRACKING AREA IDENTITY TO CORE NETWORK IN NON-TERRESTRIAL NETWORKS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Sep 29, 2023
Priority
Apr 01, 2021 — provisional 63/169,713 +1 more
Examiner
IQBAL, KHAWAR
Art Unit
2643
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
2 (Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
479 granted / 657 resolved
+10.9% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
682
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.6%
+15.6% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.1%
-34.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 657 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-19 and 23-25 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-19 and 23-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jeong et al (20220225265) in view of Dong (20230388955). Regarding claim 1, Jeong et al discloses, a method of operating a communication device (UE, fig. 3…) in a non- terrestrial network, NTN (abstract, ¶ 0204, 0216), that includes a network node (gNB/core node), the method comprising: determining a location of the communication device (UE) using global navigation satellite systems, GNSS, measurements (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE determines the identity of the earth-fixed tracking area (where the UE is located) using the estimated identities of the cells/subcells and the mapping between the virtual cell/subcell identities and the earth-fixed TAs. The UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively and the UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach.); and reporting location information based on the location to the network node, wherein reporting the location information comprises reporting a tracking area identifier, TAI, associated with a tracking area, TA, in which the communication device is located (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively. The UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach and when the UE sends to the network a registration request message including one or more of the following: (i) TAIs observed by the UE, (ii) its GNSS-based location along with an indication about the UE's confidence on the accuracy of this location with possible indication of “GNSS not visible/GNSS visibility poor/GNSS visible”, for example, the accuracy of the location can be also implicitly included in the GNSS-based location information, (iii) its virtual cell ID, (iv) time stamp associated with the GNSS-based location, and (v) estimated speed and direction of travel if available). Jeong et al does not specifically disclose, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas. In the same field of endeavor, Dong discloses, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas (¶ 0048-0049, reporting auxiliary information, the auxiliary information includes location information and movement information of the UE and the auxiliary information is configured to determine whether the UE is located in a boundary of two Tracking Areas by a core network.). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Jeong et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to improving signaling overhead of mobility management and the network can track the UE when the network data needs to be sent to the UE, and the UE needs to broadcast a paging message in a tracking area as taught by Dong. Regarding claim 2, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, further comprising: determining the TAI based on at least one of: the location; a list of a plurality of TAIs associated with the NTN; information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of the plurality TAIs; and a validity timer associated with a signal broadcast from the network node (¶ 0209-0211, 0239, the UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively. The UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach and when the UE sends to the network a registration request message including one or more of the following: (i) TAIs observed by the UE, (ii) its GNSS-based location along with an indication about the UE's confidence on the accuracy of this location with possible indication of “GNSS not visible/GNSS visibility poor/GNSS visible”, for example, the accuracy of the location can be also implicitly included in the GNSS-based location information, (iii) its virtual cell ID, (iv) time stamp associated with the GNSS-based location, and (v) estimated speed and direction of travel if available). Regarding claim 3, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein reporting the location information comprises reporting the location to the network node during a radio resource control, RRC, connection establishment procedure, and wherein reporting the location information further comprises reporting the location in at least one of a: RRC setup complete message and a RRC setup request message (¶ 0225, 0238, RRC messages such as RRC setup request, RRC setup complete, RRC reconfiguration complete, and measurement report are used by the UE to convey the border crossing indication and the country code/PLMN.). Regarding claim 4, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein reporting the location information further comprises reporting the location in an uplink non-access stratum, NAS message (¶ 0005-0007, the transceiver configured to: transmit, to a UE, an SIB including multiple TAIs and the indication in a NAS registration/tracking area update operation, and receive, from the UE, an RRC message including information for the UE location, wherein the RRC message encapsulates a NAS message). Regarding claim 5, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein reporting the location information further comprises transmitting an indication of a period of time during which the location may be used by the network node, and wherein the period of time comprises at least one of: a lifetime of a radio resource control, RRC, connection between the communication device and the network node; and only for a specific location reporting occasion (¶ 0208-0209, 0206, 0233,, the gNB broadcasts TAIs in SIB1 such that these TAIs include not only the TAs illuminated by the cell's beam but also the TAs that are expected to be illuminated by the cell's beam in future. In an example approach, the gNB broadcasts TAIs of all the TAs that are expected to be illuminated at any instant during a target time window. This target window can be defined to be the SIB1 window (e.g., 160 ms in 5G NR) in an example approach. Non-SIB1 time windows are defined for conveying TAIs in SIB1 or other SIBs (e.g., those for a TN or an NTN) in another example approach. The TAI-carrying SIB is compatible with Earth-fixed TAs such that a UE located in a given TA would always find its TAI in the TAIs being broadcast by the gNB). Regarding claim 6, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, further comprising: receiving a request for the location from the network node, wherein reporting the location information comprises reporting the location in response to receiving the request for the location (¶ 0270-0272, the UE may receive from the gNB in system information an indication of one or more of the following features: (i) its use/support of earth-fixed virtual cells, (ii) the need for the UE to report its GNSS-based location in registration/tracking area update related AS/NAS messages, and (iii) the need for the UE to report its GNSS-based location in registration/tracking area update related AS/NAS messages. In the absence of one or more of such indications, the reporting can be made mandatory for the UE via specifications or rules). Regarding claim 7, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein reporting the location information comprises reporting the location in response to at least one of: determining that multiple tracking area identifiers, TAIs, are broadcast in a cell of the network node; and a purpose of the RRC connection establishment is to send a registration request non-access stratum, NAS, message (¶ 0233, 0273, when the UE sends to the network a registration request message including one or more of the following: (i) TAIs observed by the UE, (ii) its GNSS-based location along with an indication about the UE's confidence on the accuracy of this location with possible indication of “GNSS not visible/GNSS visibility poor/GNSS visible,” for example, the accuracy of the location can be also implicitly included in the GNSS-based location information, (iii) its virtual cell ID, (iv) time stamp associated with the GNSS-based location, and (v) estimated speed and direction of travel). Regarding claim 8, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein the network node comprises one of a radio access network, RAN, node or a core network, CN, node (¶ 0270-0272, the UE may receive from the gNB in system information an indication of one or more of the following features: (i) its use/support of earth-fixed virtual cells, (ii) the need for the UE to report its GNSS-based location in registration/tracking area update related AS/NAS messages, and (iii) the need for the UE to report its GNSS-based location in registration/tracking area update related AS/NAS messages.). Regarding claim 9, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, a method of operating a radio access network, RAN, node in a non-terrestrial network, NTN, that includes a communication device, the method comprising (abstract): determining one or more tracking area identifiers, TAIs, to transmit to a core network, CN, node, the one or more TAIs being associated with a cell in which the location device (¶ 0238-0239, 0241-0245, when the UE sends to the network a registration request message including one or more of the following: (i) TAIs observed by the UE, (ii) its GNSS-based location; the gNB uses the UE-reported GNSS location to determine the virtual cell identity and provides such identity to the AMF in step F5S6. In another embodiment of the present disclosure, the gNB maps the virtual cell identity that it has determined or obtained from the UE); and transmitting the one or more TAIs to the CN node (¶ 0241-0245, when the UE sends to the network a registration request message including one or more of the following: (i) TAIs observed by the UE, (ii) its GNSS-based location and the gNB/eNB forwards the UE's NAS message to the AMF/mobile management entity (MME) using an NGAP/S1AP message such as INITIAL UE MESSAGE or UPLINK NAS TRANSPORT; the gNB/eNB sends a single TAI to the MME/AMF. This TAI reflects UE's GNSS-based location and/or the virtual cell ID. In one more approach, the gNB/eNB sends multiple TAIs to the MME/AMF to enhance reliability of the registration to be carried out by the MME/AMF.). Jeong et al does not specifically disclose, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas. In the same field of endeavor, Dong discloses, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas (¶ 0048-0049, reporting auxiliary information, the auxiliary information includes location information and movement information of the UE and the auxiliary information is configured to determine whether the UE is located in a boundary of two Tracking Areas by a core network.). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Jeong et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to improving signaling overhead of mobility management and the network can track the UE when the network data needs to be sent to the UE, and the UE needs to broadcast a paging message in a tracking area as taught by Dong. Regarding claim 10, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 9 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein the one or more TAIs are associated with the cell in which multiple TAIs are broadcast in parallel, wherein determining the one or more TAIs to transmit comprises determining to transmit all the TAIs being broadcast in parallel in the cell, and wherein transmitting the one or more TAIs comprises transmitting all the TAIs being broadcast in parallel in the cell to the CN node (¶ 0233, 0236-0237, the gNB broadcasts a compact representation of TAIs in a SIB. For example, instead of broadcasting full TAIs, the gNB separates the common part of TAIs (e.g., common fields across the broadcast TAIs such as PLMN ID) and dedicated parts of TAIs. This may reduce the size of the SIB. In one approach, the common part can be indicated first, followed by dedicated parts of different TAIs. In another approach, the first TAI is fully specified and remaining TAIs are specified by defining dedicated non-common parts). Regarding claim 11, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 9 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein the one or more TAIs are associated with the cell in which a single TAI that changes with regular or irregular time intervals is broadcast, and wherein determining the one or more TAIs to transmit comprises determining to transmit to the CN node, at least one of: a first TAI that is currently being periodically broadcast in the cell; and a second TAI that is not currently being periodically broadcast in the cell, but will be broadcast within a period of time shorter than a predetermined threshold amount of time (¶ 0233, 0236-0237, the gNB broadcasts TAIs in SIB1 such that these TAIs include not only the TAs illuminated by the cell's beam but also the TAs that are expected to be illuminated by the cell's beam in future. In an example approach, the gNB broadcasts TAIs of all the TAs that are expected to be illuminated at any instant during a target time window. This target window can be defined to be the SIB1 window (e.g., 160 ms in 5G NR) in an example approach. Non-SIB1 time windows are defined for conveying TAIs in SIB1 or other SIBs (e.g., those for a TN or an NTN) in another example approach. The TAI-carrying SIB is compatible with Earth-fixed TAs such that a UE located in a given TA would always find its TAI in the TAIs being broadcast by the gNB and the gNB broadcasts a compact representation of TAIs in a SIB. For example, instead of broadcasting full TAIs, the gNB separates the common part of TAIs (e.g., common fields across the broadcast TAIs such as PLMN ID) and dedicated parts of TAIs. This may reduce the size of the SIB. In one approach, the common part can be indicated first, followed by dedicated parts of different TAIs. In another approach, the first TAI is fully specified and remaining TAIs are specified by defining dedicated non-common parts) . Regarding claim 12, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 9 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein determining the one or more TAIs to transmit comprises determining a TAI associated with a tracking area, TA, in which the communication device is located (¶ 0209, 0233, 0236-0237, the gNB broadcasts TAIs in SIB1 such that these TAIs include not only the TAs illuminated by the cell's beam but also the TAs that are expected to be illuminated by the cell's beam in future. In an example approach, the gNB broadcasts TAIs of all the TAs that are expected to be illuminated at any instant during a target time window). Regarding claim 13, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 9 further, Jeong et al discloses, further comprising: determining a location of the communication device; and determining the TA in which the communication device is located based on the location of the communication device (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE determines the identity of the earth-fixed tracking area (where the UE is located) using the estimated identities of the virtual cells/subcells and the mapping between the virtual cell/subcell identities and the earth-fixed TAs. The UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively (e.g., less reliable due to poor GNSS availability or old GNSS location or an indicator of positioning ambiguity). The UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach). Regarding claim 14, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 9 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein determining the location comprises determining the location based on a beam used for communication with the communication device (0233, the gNB broadcasts TAIs in SIB1 such that these TAIs include not only the TAs illuminated by the cell's beam but also the TAs that are expected to be illuminated by the cell's beam in future. In an example approach, the gNB broadcasts TAIs of all the TAs that are expected to be illuminated at any instant during a target time window. This target window can be defined to be the SIB1 window (e.g., 160 ms in 5G NR) in an example approach. Non-SIB1 time windows are defined for conveying TAIs in SIB1 or other SIBs (e.g., those for a TN or an NTN) in another example approach. The TAI-carrying SIB is compatible with Earth-fixed TAs such that a UE located in a given TA would always find its TAI in the TAIs being broadcast by the gNB). Regarding claim 15, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, wherein transmitting the second TAI comprises transmitting a next generation application protocol, NGAP, message to the CN node including the second TAI (¶ 0242, 0246, the gNB/eNB forwards the UE's NAS message to the AMF/mobile management entity (MME) using an NGAP/S1AP message such as INITIAL UE MESSAGE or UPLINK NAS TRANSPORT). Regarding claim 16, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 9 further, Jeong et al discloses, determining to request an updated location based on an amount of time since receiving a previous location from the communication device exceeding a threshold value; and responsive to determining that the amount of time exceeds the threshold value, transmitting a request for the updated location to the communication device (¶ 0123, 0248, 0254, 0280, If a neighbor cell exceeds such threshold, it is reported by the UE in steps F6S5, F6S10, or F6S12). Regarding claim 17, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, further comprising: determining the second TAI based on an amount of time before a TAI switch from the first TAI being periodically broadcast in the cell in which the communication device is located to the second TAI being periodically broadcast in the cell, wherein transmitting the second TAI comprises at least one of: responsive to the amount of time being less than a threshold value, transmitting the first TAI and the second TAI to the CN node (¶ 0123, 0248, 0254, 0280, If a neighbor cell exceeds such threshold, it is reported by the UE in steps F6S5, F6S10, or F6S12); transmitting the first TAI, the second TAI, and the amount of time before the TAI switch, and wherein the second TAI is different from the first TAI (¶ 0123, 0248, 0254, 0280, If a neighbor cell exceeds such threshold, it is reported by the UE in steps F6S5, F6S10, or F6S12, the gNB broadcasts TAIs in SIB1 such that these TAIs include not only the TAs illuminated by the cell's beam but also the TAs that are expected to be illuminated by the cell's beam in future. In an example approach, the gNB broadcasts TAIs of all the TAs that are expected to be illuminated at any instant during a target time window. This target window can be defined to be the SIB1 window (e.g., 160 ms in 5G NR) in an example approach. Non-SIB1 time windows are defined for conveying TAIs in SIB1 or other SIBs (e.g., those for a TN or an NTN) in another example approach. The TAI-carrying SIB is compatible with earth-fixed TAIs such that a UE located in a given TAI would always find its TAI in the TAIs being broadcast by the gNB). Regarding claim 18, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 9, 11, further, Jeong et al discloses, further comprising: receiving configuration information from the CN node, wherein transmitting the second TAI comprises transmitting the second TAI based on the configuration information (¶ 0123, 0248, 0254, 0280, If a neighbor cell exceeds such threshold, it is reported by the UE in steps F6S5, F6S10, or F6S12, the gNB broadcasts TAIs in SIB1 such that these TAIs include not only the TAs illuminated by the cell's beam but also the TAs that are expected to be illuminated by the cell's beam in future. In an example approach, the gNB broadcasts TAIs of all the TAs that are expected to be illuminated at any instant during a target time window. This target window can be defined to be the SIB1 window (e.g., 160 ms in 5G NR) in an example approach. Non-SIB1 time windows are defined for conveying TAIs in SIB1 or other SIBs (e.g., those for a TN or an NTN) in another example approach. The TAI-carrying SIB is compatible with earth-fixed TAIs such that a UE located in a given TAI would always find its TAI in the TAIs being broadcast by the gNB). Regarding claim 19, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 11 further, Jeong et al discloses, further comprising: transmitting a request, to the communication device, for permission to use location information associated with the communication device, wherein the request for permission comprises a request for permission to use at least one of: location information previously reported by the communication device; any location information reported by the communication device during a radio resource control, RRC, connection between the communication device and the network node; and information associated with a location of the communication device for core network related procedures (¶ 0233, 0239-0245, the gNB broadcasts TAIs in SIB1 such that these TAIs include not only the TAs illuminated by the cell's beam but also the TAs that are expected to be illuminated by the cell's beam in future. In an example approach, the gNB broadcasts TAIs of all the TAs that are expected to be illuminated at any instant during a target time window. This target window can be defined to be the SIB1 window (e.g., 160 ms in 5G NR) in an example approach. Non-SIB1 time windows are defined for conveying TAIs in SIB1 or other SIBs (e.g., those for a TN or an NTN) in another example approach. The TAI-carrying SIB is compatible with Earth-fixed TAs such that a UE located in a given TA would always find its TAI in the TAIs being broadcast by the gNB). Regarding claim 23, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, a communication device in a non-terrestrial network, NTN, that includes a network node, the communication device (abstract) comprising: processing circuitry (340, fig. 3); and memory (360, fig. 3) coupled to the processing circuitry and having instructions stored therein that are executable by the processing circuitry to cause the communication device to perform operations comprising any of the operations of (¶ 0058-0059, fig. 3): determining a location of the communication device using global navigation satellite systems, GNSS, measurements (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE determines the identity of the earth-fixed tracking area (where the UE is located) using the estimated identities of the cells/subcells and the mapping between the virtual cell/subcell identities and the earth-fixed TAs. The UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively and the UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach.); and reporting location information based on the location to the network node, wherein reporting the location information comprises reporting a tracking area identifier, TAI, associated with a tracking area, TA, in which the communication device is located (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively. The UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach and when the UE sends to the network a registration request message including one or more of the following: (i) TAIs observed by the UE, (ii) its GNSS-based location along with an indication about the UE's confidence on the accuracy of this location with possible indication of “GNSS not visible/GNSS visibility poor/GNSS visible”, for example, the accuracy of the location can be also implicitly included in the GNSS-based location information, (iii) its virtual cell ID, (iv) time stamp associated with the GNSS-based location, and (v) estimated speed and direction of travel if available). Jeong et al does not specifically disclose, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas. In the same field of endeavor, Dong discloses, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas (¶ 0048-0049, reporting auxiliary information, the auxiliary information includes location information and movement information of the UE and the auxiliary information is configured to determine whether the UE is located in a boundary of two Tracking Areas by a core network.). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Jeong et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to improving signaling overhead of mobility management and the network can track the UE when the network data needs to be sent to the UE, and the UE needs to broadcast a paging message in a tracking area as taught by Dong. Regarding claim 24, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, a communication device in a non-terrestrial network, NTN, that includes a network node, the communication device adapted to perform any of the operations of (abstract, fig. 18): determining a location of the communication device using global navigation satellite systems, GNSS, measurements (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE determines the identity of the earth-fixed tracking area (where the UE is located) using the estimated identities of the cells/subcells and the mapping between the virtual cell/subcell identities and the earth-fixed TAs. The UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively and the UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach); and reporting location information based on the location to the network node, wherein reporting the location information comprises reporting a tracking area identifier, TAI, associated with a tracking area, TA, in which the communication device is located (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively. The UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach and when the UE sends to the network a registration request message including one or more of the following: (i) TAIs observed by the UE, (ii) its GNSS-based location along with an indication about the UE's confidence on the accuracy of this location with possible indication of “GNSS not visible/GNSS visibility poor/GNSS visible”, for example, the accuracy of the location can be also implicitly included in the GNSS-based location information, (iii) its virtual cell ID, (iv) time stamp associated with the GNSS-based location, and (v) estimated speed and direction of travel if available). Jeong et al does not specifically disclose, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas. In the same field of endeavor, Dong discloses, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas (¶ 0048-0049, reporting auxiliary information, the auxiliary information includes location information and movement information of the UE and the auxiliary information is configured to determine whether the UE is located in a boundary of two Tracking Areas by a core network.). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Jeong et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to improving signaling overhead of mobility management and the network can track the UE when the network data needs to be sent to the UE, and the UE needs to broadcast a paging message in a tracking area as taught by Dong. Regarding claim 25, Jeong et al and Dong disclose, in claim 1 further, Jeong et al discloses, a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing thereon computer program comprising program code to be executed by processing circuitry of a communication device in a non-terrestrial network, NTN, that includes a network node, whereby execution of the program code causes the communication device to perform operations comprising any of the operations of (abstract, fig. 1): determining a location of the communication device using global navigation satellite systems, GNSS, measurements (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE determines the identity of the earth-fixed tracking area (where the UE is located) using the estimated identities of the cells/subcells and the mapping between the virtual cell/subcell identities and the earth-fixed TAs. The UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively and the UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach.); and reporting location information based on the location to the network node, wherein reporting the location information comprises reporting a tracking area identifier, TAI, associated with a tracking area, TA, in which the communication device is located (¶ 0209, 0239, the UE may report its confidence about the earth-fixed tracking area ID quantitatively or qualitatively. The UE may report an absolute or relative time of the GNSS-based location used in the earth-fixed tracking area ID determination in an example approach and when the UE sends to the network a registration request message including one or more of the following: (i) TAIs observed by the UE, (ii) its GNSS-based location along with an indication about the UE's confidence on the accuracy of this location with possible indication of “GNSS not visible/GNSS visibility poor/GNSS visible”, for example, the accuracy of the location can be also implicitly included in the GNSS-based location information, (iii) its virtual cell ID, (iv) time stamp associated with the GNSS-based location, and (v) estimated speed and direction of travel if available). Jeong et al does not specifically disclose, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas. In the same field of endeavor, Dong discloses, wherein the TAI is determined based on information regarding TAI borders associated with each TAI of a plurality of TAIs, wherein the TAI borders define geographical areas (¶ 0048-0049, reporting auxiliary information, the auxiliary information includes location information and movement information of the UE and the auxiliary information is configured to determine whether the UE is located in a boundary of two Tracking Areas by a core network.). Therefore, before the effective filing date of the claim invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the device of Jeong et al by specifically adding feature in order to enhance system performance to improving signaling overhead of mobility management and the network can track the UE when the network data needs to be sent to the UE, and the UE needs to broadcast a paging message in a tracking area as taught by Dong. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KHAWAR IQBAL whose telephone number is (571)272-7909. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jinsong Hu can be reached at 5712723965. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHAWAR IQBAL/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 29, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 22, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707250
Methods for Handling Radio Access Network Notification Area (RNA) Update Configuration Upon Reject
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701418
AUTHENTICATION AND AUTHORIZATION IN A PRIVATE MOBILE NETWORK
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12701413
END-TO-END AUTHENTICATION VIA A WTRU-TO-WTRU RELAY
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696219
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COMMUNICATION SERVICES
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12690009
ELEVATION ESTIMATION FOR DETERMINING OPERATING CHANNELS AND TRANSMISSION PARAMETERS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.3%)
3y 5m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 657 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month