Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/285,360

A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXCHANGING AND MANAGING DATA STORED IN HETEROGENEOUS DATA SOURCES

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Oct 02, 2023
Priority
Apr 06, 2021 — EU 21305436.4 +1 more
Examiner
LY, CHEYNE D
Art Unit
2152
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Amadeus S.A.S.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
628 granted / 798 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
822
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.1%
-35.9% vs TC avg
§103
76.5%
+36.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 798 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The amendment to the specification, filed January 06, 2026, is acknowledged. REMARKS The amendment to claim 4 overcomes the objection to claim 4 of record. On page 11, Applicant argues the presently claimed "central data management system", "local data management system" and "communication module" have now been clarified as servers throughout the claims. Such an amendment is supported at least in part by paragraphs [0002] and [0027] of the application as filed. Applicant’s argument is not persuasive because the pointed to paragraphs [0002] and [0027] do not describe the “servers” in a way that would preclude the interpretation of “servers” being software per se. As understood by one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing of the invention, a server in computer science is a computer program (software) or device that provides functionality for other programs or devices, called clients. The instant specification does not describe the claimed “server” to preclude the embodiment of software per se. The 35 U.S.C. 101 rejection as applied to claims 1-14 is maintained. Claims 1-16, filed January 06, 2026, are examined on the merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-14 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. The claim(s) does/do not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claims 1-14 are directed to a software per se embodiment. The instant specification describes the claim computer system comprising “a database” ([0032]) and “a communication module” ([0033]) which embody software per se subject matter. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-16 are free of any prior art and would be allowable once the 35 USC 101 rejection is overcome. CONCLUSION Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Patent applicants with problems or questions regarding electronic images that can be viewed in the Patent Application Information Retrieval system (PAIR) can now contact the USPTO's Patent Electronic Business Center (Patent EBC) for assistance. Representatives are available to answer your questions daily from 6 am to midnight (EST). The toll free number is (866) 217-9197. When calling please have your application serial or patent number, the type of document you are having an image problem with, the number of pages and the specific nature of the problem. The Patent Electronic Business Center will notify applicants of the resolution of the problem within 5-7 business days. Applicants can also check PAIR to confirm that the problem has been corrected. The USPTO's Patent Electronic Business Center is a complete service center supporting all patent business on the Internet. The USPTO's PAIR system provides Internet-based access to patent application status and history information. It also enables applicants to view the scanned images of their own application file folder(s) as well as general patent information available to the public. For all other customer support, please call the USPTO Call Center (UCC) at 800-786-9199. The USPTO's official fax number is 571-272-8300. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to C. Dune Ly, whose telephone number is (571) 272-0716. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday from 8 A.M. to 4 PM ET. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Neveen Abel-Jalil, can be reached on 571-270-0474. /Cheyne D Ly/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2152 3/24/2026 .
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 02, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Jan 06, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101
Jun 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12675696
SPARSITY FOR NEURAL NETWORK MODELS BASED ON SPARSITY ATTRIBUTES
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12664135
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING HIGH-QUALITY SEISMIC DATA FROM LOW-QUALITY SEISMIC DATA
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12657157
EXTENDING AN EXPIRATION TIME OF AN OBJECT ASSOCIATED WITH AN ARCHIVE
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12625870
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ASSOCIATING DATA ENTRIES
1y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12613855
DATABASE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLIENT-SIDE INITIATION OF SERVER-SIDE ACTIONS
1y 8m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.9%)
3y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 798 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month