Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/285,522

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR POWER AMPLIFIER COMPENSATION

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Examiner
NGUYEN, KHANH V
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allow Rate
1105 granted / 1181 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+1.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1208
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
28.8%
-11.2% vs TC avg
§102
39.6%
-0.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.2%
-12.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1181 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the expression "determining a compensation value for each of a plurality of power ranges" is vague and indefinite, since it is not clear what the compensation value is compensating, how said values are determined or what is being referred to by the power ranges. Furthermore, it is not clear what circuit element(s) for “determining compensation value …” claimed. Regarding claim 1, the expression "determining one of the plurality of power ranges to which transmission power of an initial symbol belongs" is vague and indefinite, since it is not clear what circuit element(s) for "determining one of the plurality of power ranges …” claimed. Regarding claim 1, the expression "compensating the initial symbol with the compensation value for the one power range to obtain a compensated symbol, for transmission after passing through a power amplifier” is unclear and indefinite, since it is not clear what circuit element(s) for “compensating the initial symbol …” claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5 and 8-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kakinuma et al. (20160028421), hereafter called KAKINUMA. Regarding claim 1, KAKINUMA (Figs. 2, 3 and 21-23) discloses a communication device having compensation comprising: determining a compensation value for each of a plurality of power ranges; determining one of the plurality of power ranges to which transmission power of an initial symbol belongs, and compensating the initial symbol with the compensation value for the one power range to obtain a compensated symbol, for transmission after passing through a power amplifier (23), see block (12/212M) and para. [0046]. Regarding claim 2, wherein the respective compensation values for the plurality of power ranges are maintained in a look-up table (33), and the compensation value for the one power range is determined from the look-up table. Regarding claim 3, wherein the claimed subject matters are considered straightforward implementation details of KAKINUMA, see BACKGROUND. Regarding claim 4, further comprising: obtaining a symbol as a result of the compensated symbol transmitted after passing through the power amplifier (23) and received by means of coupling (15); and updating the compensation value via correction unit (35) for the one power range based on the obtained symbol, see Figs. 3 and 22. Regarding claim 5, wherein said updating comprises: calculating (31) an offset between the initial symbol and the obtained symbol; and updating the compensation value for the one power range based on the offset, see Figs. 3 and 22. Regarding claim 8, an apparatus (300) for power amplifier compensation, comprising a processor (301) and a memory (302), wherein the memory (302) is inherently seen comprising instructions executable by the processor (301). Regarding claim 9, only specify intended uses of the invention which are not given any patentable weight as they do not materially effect to the final product claimed. the limitation “the apparatus is provided in a Digital Unit, DU, of a network device, and the power amplifier is provided in a Radio Unit, RU, of the network device” are seen to define intended use of the invention, wherein the circuit of KAKINUMA is capable of providing in a Digital Unit, DU, of a network device, and the power amplifier is provided in a Radio Unit, RU, of the network device as claimed. Regarding claim 10, see claim 1 above and para. [0152]. Claim(s) 1-6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Suzuki et al. (20100304694), hereafter called SUZUKI. Regarding claim 1, SUZUKI (Fig. 2) disclose a method for power amplifier (9) compensation, comprising: determining a compensation value for each of a plurality of power ranges ("A distortion-compensation processing unit 40 of the distortion compensating unit 4 has a memory (look-up table (LUT)) 41 in which distortion compensation coefficients corresponding to the two-dimensional coordinates of the power level of a transmission signal and the power difference between the transmission signal and a feedback signal are stored.", paragraph [0030], given that a LUT always has a limited number of entries, the power will have been divided into power ranges); determining one of the plurality of power ranges to which transmission power of an initial symbol belongs ("The transmission- signal generating unit 1 assigns a unit time (carrier unit, symbol unit, or frame unit) for measuring electrical power to the electrical-power measuring unit 5 (S100). The FW-power measuring unit 51 and the FB- power measuring unit 53 measure power values of transmission signals (forward (FW) signal) and feedback (FB) signals in each assigned unit time (carrier unit, symbol unit, or frame unit) (S102 and S104). Each of the measured power values is an integral value of electrical power in one carrier unit in the unit time. When the assigned unit time is a carrier unit, the power value for one carrier is the measured power value. When the assigned unit time is a symbol unit or a frame unit, integral values of power values of carriers in one symbol or one frame are the measured power values.", paragraph [0033];); and compensating the initial symbol with the compensation value for the one power range to obtain a compensated symbol, for transmission after passing through a power amplifier ("distortion-compensation- coefficient multiplying unit 42 that reads out a distortion compensation coefficient corresponding to the power level of a transmission signal from the LUT 41 and multiplies a parallel data string (transmission signal) of an I signal and a Q signal with the distortion compensation coefficient", see para. [0030] . Regarding claim 2, SUZUKI discloses (A distortion- compensation processing unit 40 of the distortion compensating unit 4 has a memory (look-up table (LUT)) 41 in which distortion compensation coefficients corresponding to the two-dimensional coordinates of the power level of a transmission signal and the power difference between the transmission signal and a feedback signal are stored." "distortion-compensation-coefficient multiplying unit 42 that reads out a distortion compensation coefficient corresponding to the power level of a transmission signal from the LUT 41 and multiplies a parallel data string (transmission signal) of an I signal and a Q signal with the distortion compensation coefficient.", para. [0030]) Regarding claim 3, wherein the claimed subject matters are considered straightforward implementation details of SUZUKI, see BACKGROUND. Regarding claims 4 and 5, wherein claimed subject matters are inherently seen in SUZUKI, see (Fig.2A-Fig.2B; paras. [0033]-[0036]). Regarding claim 6, wherein the claimed subject matters are considered straightforward implementation details of SUZUKI in order to compare the input and output power, since the power amplifier amplifies the input signal and the power amplification always contains a delay, said delay and amplification must be compensated before the comparison, see para. [0034], "The delay adjustment memory 52 adjusts the time difference between the power measuring timing of a transmission signal (FW signal) and the measuring timing of a feedback signal (FB signal) corresponding to the transmission signal. The delay adjustment memory 52 delays the output timing of the measured power value of the measured transmission signal to the gain control unit 44. The delay adjustment memory 52 supplies the measured power value of the transmission signal to the gain control unit 44 at the same timing as the output timing of the measured power value of the feedback signal.", which discloses a compensation in phase before the comparison). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 7 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over SUZUKI/ KAKINUMA. Regarding claim 7, wherein the claimed subject matters are considered straightforward implementation details of SUZUKI/ KAKINUMA, which the skilled person would consider depending on the application requirements, without involving any inventive skill. For example, GaN transistors are well known for their advantages in high power and high speed application. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The additional reference(s) cited in PTO-892 show further analogous prior art circuitry. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Khanh V. Nguyen whose telephone number is (571) 272-1767. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, LINDGREN BALTZELL ANDREA can be reached on (571) 272-5918. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application lnformation Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHANH V NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597889
DISTORTION COMPENSATION FOR A SWITCH IN AN AMPLIFIER CIRCUIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12580541
GAIN EQUALIZER AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING TUNABLE GAIN OF GAIN EQUALIZER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573994
METHODS RELATED TO AMPLIFICATION OF RADIO-FREQUENCY SIGNALS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567844
CLASS D AMPLIFIER WITH STABILIZED PWM CONTROL LOOP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567845
AMPLIFIER AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+1.9%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1181 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month