Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/285,522

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR POWER AMPLIFIER COMPENSATION

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Oct 04, 2023
Priority
Apr 09, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021086132
Examiner
NGUYEN, KHANH V
Art Unit
2843
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
2 (Final)
94%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 94% — above average
94%
Career Allowance Rate
1119 granted / 1197 resolved
+25.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 12m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1216
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
§102
39.5%
-0.5% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1197 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the original method claimed are clearly disclosed in Fig. 2 and the specification. However, the newly method claimed are neither disclosed in the drawing or specification. Therefore, it is impossible to follow the method claimed. Among others, the newly introduced method, such as “the transmission power falls within a particular power range”, “assigned/assigning … particular power range” and “determining a second compensation value …”, there is nowhere in the specification disclosed this method. Clarification is needed. Regarding claims 2-8, also rejected due to their dependency on rejected claim 1. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Khanh V. Nguyen whose telephone number is (571) 272-1767. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JESSICA HAN can be reached on (571) 272-2078. The fax phone numbers for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application lnformation Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KHANH V NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2843
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 04, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
May 13, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 31, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700839
AN AMPLIFIER ARRANGEMENT WITH ENHANCED HARMONIC REJECTION
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700834
PHASE COMPENSATION CIRCUIT MODULE, POWER AMPLIFICATION ASSEMBLY, AND COMPENSATION METHOD AND DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695432
POWER AMPLIFIER SYSTEMS WITH FREQUENCY RESPONSE COMPENSATION
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695430
CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR PROTECTING POWER AMPLIFIER
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689344
CRYOGENIC PARAMETRIC AMPLIFIER CONTROL APPARATUS
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
94%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+2.0%)
1y 12m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1197 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month