Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/287,778

ETCHING SOLUTION

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 20, 2023
Priority
Apr 22, 2021 — JP 2021-072537 +1 more
Examiner
TRAN, BINH X
Art Unit
1713
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Kao Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
750 granted / 921 resolved
+16.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
954
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
65.7%
+25.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.8%
-30.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.8%
-20.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 921 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions 2. Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-8, 11-13) in the reply filed on 04/23/2026 is acknowledged. 3. Claims 9-10 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 04/23/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 4. In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. 5. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 6. Claims 1-5, 8, 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and/or 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lee (US 2018/0346811 A1). As to claim 1, Lee discloses a etchant for removing silicon nitride comprises: a siloxane compound modified with a compound having an alkyleneoxy group (See paragraph 0041; i.e. Silwet L-77 aka 3-(2-Methoxyethoxy)propyl-methyl-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)silane; See evidence reference PubChem “3-(2-Methoxyethoxy)propyl-methyl-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)silane” via https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Silwet-L-77 Note: Silwet L-77 read on applicant’s limitation siloxane compound modified with a compound having an alkyleneoxy group); a phosphoric acid (abstract, paragraph 0028); water (paragraph 0026). As to claim 2, Lee discloses wherein a siloxane compound modified with a compound having an alkylneoxy group, a phosphoric acid and water are blended to form the etchant (paragraph 0041, 0026-0028). As to claim 3, Lee discloses a siloxane compound modified with a compound having an alkyleneoxy group is a siloxane with the following structure as shown below based on evidence reference (See paragraph 0041; i.e. Silwet L-77 aka 3-(2-Methoxyethoxy)propyl-methyl-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)silane. It is well known in the art that Silwet L-77 has the following structure (See evidence reference: PubChem “3-(2-Methoxyethoxy)propyl-methyl-bis(trimethylsilyloxy)silane” via https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Silwet-L-77 PNG media_image1.png 318 482 media_image1.png Greyscale Therefore, Lee discloses the siloxane compound modified with a compound having an alkyleneoxy group is a siloxane with the structure represented by formula (I): PNG media_image2.png 292 376 media_image2.png Greyscale Wherein R = methyl or methoxy group having 1 carbon atoms; r = 1 or 2; t = 1. As to claim 4, Lee discloses the siloxane compound modified with a compound having an alkyleneoxy group is a siloxane with the structure represented by formula (II): PNG media_image3.png 289 569 media_image3.png Greyscale Wherein Wherein R = methyl or methoxy group having 1 carbon atoms; r = 1 or 2; t = 1. s = 0; and t/(s+t) x 100 = 100 (within applicant’s range of “4 or more”) As to claim 5, Lee discloses the R in the formula (I) is a methyl group or methoxy group (See structure of Silwet L-77 above). As to claim 8, Lee discloses an etching temperature of 100 °C to 200 °C, preferable 150 to 180 °C (See paragraph 0065; Note: 150 °C, 180 °C or 200 °C are within applicant’s range of 110 °C or more and 250 °C or less). As to claim 12, Lee discloses the R in the formula (II) is a methyl group or methoxy group (See structure of Silwet L-77 above). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 7. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 8. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 2018/0346811 A1) as applied to claims 1-5, 8 above, and further in view of Yoo (US 2020/0239771 A1) As to claim 7, Lee fails to disclose the etchant having a pH of 2 or less. However, Lee clearly discloses the etchant is used to remove silicon nitride. Yoo discloses an etching solution to remove silicon nitride having a pH of 2 to 2.5 (paragraph 0089, 0096, within applicant’s range of 2 or less). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Lee in view of Yoo by having a pH of 2 because in the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists (See MPEP 2144.05(I)). 9. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 2018/0346811 A1) as applied to claims 1-5, 8 above, and further in view of Kim et al. (US 2020/0216758 A1) As to claim 7, Lee fails to disclose the etchant having a pH of 2 or less. However, Lee clearly discloses the etchant is used to remove silicon nitride. Kim discloses an etching solution to remove silicon nitride having a pH of 1 or less (paragraph 0027, within applicant’s range of 2 or less). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to modify Lee in view of Kim by having a pH of 2 because in the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists (See MPEP 2144.05(I)). Allowable Subject Matter 10. Claims 6, 11, 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 11. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: As to claim 6, the cited prior arts fail to disclose or suggest wherein R in the formula (I) is a phosphate group. As to claim 11, the cited prior arts fail to disclose or suggest wherein t/(s+t) is 10 or more and 80 or less in the formula (II). As to claim 13, the cited prior arts fail to disclose or suggest wherein R in the formula (II) is a phosphate group. Conclusion 12. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BINH X TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-1469. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joshua Allen can be reached at 571-270-3176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. BINH X. TRAN Examiner Art Unit 1713 /BINH X TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1713
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 20, 2023
Application Filed
May 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683121
PULSED VOLTAGE PLASMA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680172
CHEMICAL SOLUTION FOR REMOVING PRECIOUS METAL, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CHEMICAL SOLUTION, METHOD FOR TREATING SUBSTRATE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672492
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ETCHING A HIGH ASPECT RATIO STRUCTURE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12667916
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN EXTERNAL COMPONENT INCLUDING A DIFFRACTION GRATING
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12655320
POLISHING COMPOSTION FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESS, MANUFACTURING METHOD OF POLISHING COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE BY USING THE SAME
3y 3m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 921 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month