Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/288,564

EXTRUDABLE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING POLYMERIC PARTICLES COATED BY CARBON NANOTUBES

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 26, 2023
Priority
Apr 28, 2021 — provisional 63/180,724 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D
Art Unit
1761
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nemo Nanomaterials Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allowance Rate
403 granted / 619 resolved
At TC average
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
657
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
77.3%
+37.3% vs TC avg
§102
12.5%
-27.5% vs TC avg
§112
5.0%
-35.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 619 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/28/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment This action is responsive to applicant’s amendment filed 8/20/2025. Claims 1-20 are pending. Claims 1-8 and 14-20 are withdrawn from consideration as being drawn to non-elected inventions. The previous rejection of claim 9 under 35 U.S.C. 102(1a)(1) as being anticipated by Kwon et al. (Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 110, 3737–3744 (2008) is withdrawn in view of applicant’s amendment/remarks. The previous rejection of claims 10 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kwon et al. (Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 110, 3737–3744 (2008) in view of Enomoto (6,153,683).is withdrawn in view of applicant’s amendment/remarks. The previous rejection of claims 12 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kwon et al. (Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 110, 3737–3744 (2008) in view of Hoang et al. (US2018/0016391) is withdrawn in view of applicant’s amendment/remarks. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 9 and 10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(1a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (Polymer 51 (2010) 3715-3721). Regarding claim 9, Zhang discloses a composition (nanocomposite) comprising a plurality of particles (polystyrene/MWNT composite nanospheres), each particle comprising a polymeric core (Polystyrene PS) in contact with a shell comprising CNT (MWCNT) and a surfactant (PVP); wherein said polymeric core comprises a thermoplastic polymer; and wherein an average cross-section size of said plurality of particles is between 30 and 2000 µ m (Fig. 8, abstract and page 3716, 2.6 Fabrication of PS/CNT core-shell nanospheres). Regarding claim 10, Zhang discloses at least 99wt% of the polymeric core comprises a thermoplastic polymer; and at least 99wt% of the shell consists of CNT and the surfactant (core-shell nanospheres with polystyrene (PS) as the core and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs), and the MWNTs were grafted with poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP), abstract and page 3716, 2.6 Fabrication of PS/CNT core-shell nanospheres). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (Polymer 51 (2010) 3715-3721) in view of Enomoto (6,153,683). Zhang discloses a composition as set forth above. Zhang does not disclose the composition further comprising an additive, wherein a w/w ratio between the additive and the plurality of particles within the composition is between 1:100 and 100:1, wherein said additive comprises glass fiber, polymeric particles, or both. Enomoto discloses using glass fiber in an amount within range of from 5 to 90 wt% in a thermoplastic resin product (abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to add glass fiber to the composition of Zhang, for improving strength, melting and kneading of the composition carried out on a biaxial or uniaxial extruder. Claims 12 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al. (Polymer 51 (2010) 3715-3721) in view of Hoang et al. (US2018/0016391). Zhang discloses a composition as set forth above. Zhang does not disclose the surfactant comprises polyalkylammonium-co-polyether. Hoang discloses polyether-based surfactant including polyalkylammonium-co-polyether (example 5, para 0163), which can be used for preparing a nanocarbon material dispersion in which the nanocarbon material is favorably dispersed. The reference does not disclose a weight portion of the PS or MWCNT or a w/w ratio of said surfactant to said MWCNT. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to use polyether-based surfactant taught by Hoang as the surfactant in the composition of Zhang as well as its concentration and w/w ratio of said surfactant to said CNT suitable for use in the composition, to promote the dispersion of the polymeric core, thus proving a stable dispersion. Zhang does not disclose the composition is extrudable. However, given that Zhang’s composition and the claimed composition is structurally similar, it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill the art that Zhang’s composition would be also extrudable. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 1/28/2026 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HAIDUNG D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-5455. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th: 10a-3p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Angela Brown-Pettigrew can be reached at 571-272-2817. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HAIDUNG D NGUYEN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1761 3/7/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2023
Application Filed
May 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Aug 20, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Dec 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 28, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640364
High Capacity, Long Cycle Life Battery Anode Materials, Compositions and Methods
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12635286
Physical Forms of MXene Materials Exhibiting Novel Electrical And Optical Characteristics
1y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624231
Organic Solvent Composition and Paint Composition Comprising the Same
4y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12622170
Fluorescent Organic Light Emitting Elements Having High Efficiency
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12583749
TITANIUM-ZIRCONIUM CO-DOPED CARBON-COATED LITHIUM IRON PHOSPHATE MATERIAL AND PRODUCTION METHOD AND USE THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+28.1%)
3y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 619 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month