Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Nemo Nanomaterials Ltd. has 1 pending office action currently active in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is situated within 1 distinct art unit, which points to a specific technical classification for the application. The portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner, concentrating the current prosecution efforts on a single point of contact at the patent office.
NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 pending office action. This single examiner manages the entire 1 pending office action workload for the portfolio at this time. The fact that the prosecution is limited to 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology being patented is highly specialized within the broader Chemistry & Materials field.
With only 1 distinct examiner to address, the company can focus its resources on the specific issues raised during review. This data reflects a precise and narrow engagement with the patent office for the 1 pending office action assigned to the busiest examiner. The focused nature of this prosecution profile indicates a targeted attempt to secure intellectual property rights.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D | 1 | 64.9% | +28.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18288564 | EXTRUDABLE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING POLYMERIC PARTICLES COATED BY CARBON NANOTUBES | NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D | 12d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18288564 | EXTRUDABLE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING POLYMERIC PARTICLES COATED BY CARBON NANOTUBES | NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D | 12d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1761 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18288564 | EXTRUDABLE COMPOSITIONS COMPRISING POLYMERIC PARTICLES COATED BY CARBON NANOTUBES | NGUYEN, HAIDUNG D | 1761 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Oct 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial