Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 16, 2026
Application No. 18/289,803

DATA RETRIEVAL OF A USER EQUIPMENT IN A FIFTH-GENERATION CORE NETWORK

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Priority
May 07, 2021 — CN PCT/CN2021/092035 +1 more
Examiner
GARCIA, SANTIAGO
Art Unit
2673
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
908 granted / 1033 resolved
+25.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
1060
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
8.1%
-31.9% vs TC avg
§103
63.0%
+23.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1033 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 3-4, 6-18, 20, 22-23, 26, and 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lee (US 2022/0191090) in view of Palanisamy (US 2017/0019750). As per claim 1, Lee teaches, a method for data retrieval of a UE in a 5GC (Lee, ¶[0033] FIG. 7 illustrates a procedure in which a UE obtains LADN information through a registration procedure in a 5GC network” this represents a method for data retrieval as ¶[0254] “FIG. 17 illustrates a case in which a core network 930 is a 5GC, and the core network may include an SMF 931, a PCF 932, and a UDM/authentication server function (AUSF) 933.” And a UDM/authentication server is a given key part of data retrieval), the method being performed by a first NF node , the method comprising: (Lee, ¶[0047] “In the following description, a base station is an entity that allocates resources to terminals, and may be at least one of a gNode B, an eNode B, a Node B, a base station (BS), a wireless access unit, a base station controller, and a node on a network A terminal may include a user equipment (UE), a mobile station (MS), a cellular phone, a smartphone, a computer, or a multimedia system capable of performing communication functions. In the disclosure, a downlink (DL) may refer to a radio transmission path via which a base station transmits a signal to the terminal, and an uplink (UL) may refer to a radio transmission path via which a terminal transmits a signal to a base station.” And ¶[0053] “[0053] When the 3GPP network 200 includes an EPC as a core network, the 3GPP network 200 may include network nodes corresponding to a 5GC.” This represents a first node) obtaining a request for data of the UE from a second NF node (Lee, ¶ [0055] Network functions illustrated in FIG. 1 may be defined as follows. ¶ [0056] 3GPP network 300: May include a 3GPP radio access network and a core network.” NF is network function and ¶[0053] “the 3GPP network 200 may include network nodes corresponding to a 5GC.” 200 3GPP network 200 includes multiple nodes); retrieving the data of the UE including an AAA server FQDN (Lee, ¶ [0171] “The DN-AAA server 500 may transmit an application layer address (e.g., a URI) of an edge enabler server that the UE 100 accesses via an application layer or a domain address (FQDN) for generating an application layer address to the SMF 200 through the UE identifier and the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA server 500.” The DN-AAA server transmits and the UE 100 access via FQDN in the same manner as the application); and providing the data of the UE including the AAA server FQDN towards the second NF node ( Lee, ¶[0171] “layer or a domain address (FQDN) for generating an application layer address to the SMF 200 through the UE identifier and the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA server 500.” EU data identifier represents providing the data of the UE and AAA server “the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA” and (FQDN) for generating an application layer address represents FQDN towards the second NF node, as 200 has multiple nodes which would represent the second NF node). Lee doesn’t clearly teach, Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) from a Unified Data Repository (UDR). However, Palanisamy teaches, a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) from a Unified Data Repository (UDR) (Palanisamy, ¶[0105] “In some cases, the SPR/UDR 116 may provide the FQDN of the SCSs.” This represents FQDN from UDR since UDR provides the FQDN. As far the User Data Repository" (UDR) and "Unified Data Repository" (UDR) meaning different things, they mean the same thing in telecom and 3GPP network architecture The term evolved from "User Data Repository" in older 3GPP standards to "Unified Data Repository" in 5G systems, though both refer to the exact same centralized database concept. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to combine the teachings of Lee with those of Palanisamy to have a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) from a Unified Data Repository (UDR). The motivation would have been to enable seamless and unambiguous service discovery through the Network Repository Function (NRF), allowing other network functions to securely and reliably locate the central database without hardcoding fragile IP addresses, therefore addressing reliability. As per claim 3, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein the method is performed as part of a PDU session establishment procedure for the UE (Lee, ¶[0137] “In the 5GC, the edge data network corresponds to one data network, and the UE can access the edge data network through a PDU session connection.” This represents the method is performed as part of a PDU session establishment procedure for the UE PDU session connection as disclosed by Lee). As per claim 4, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein the request for data is a request for Session Management Subscription Data Retrieval for the UE (Lee, ¶ [0276] “In operation 1110, a UE 101 performs authentication with an authentication/authorization server using a user identifier or a generic public subscription identifier (GPSI: Identifier for identifying a subscriber).” And ¶[0014] “Accordingly, various functions are being developed based on a structure in which a mobility management function and a session management function are separated in order to address complexity in function/implementation of a core device in charge of a control plane and to improve scalability in signaling load.” Represents that these session management can be in part, part of the identifying the subscriber). As per claims 6 and 20, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein the data of the UE is provided either in a DnnConfiguration object or in a 5gVnGroupData object (Lee, ¶[0097] “The DN for Internet access refers to a default PDN connection in an EPC architecture, and may be a DNN specified in DNN information stored in a local configuration of the UE or a USRP rule having a match-all traffic descriptor among policies received through a URSP in the 5GC.” This represents Dnn configuration). As per claims 8 and 22, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 1, wherein the first NF node is a UDM node and wherein the second NF node is an SMF node (Lee, ¶[0240] “For this service, an edge enabler server 310 may interwork with the UDM 723.” And ¶ [0052] “a session management function (SMF),” all in fig.1, 200 inside which includes multiple nodes). As per claim 9, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, a method for data retrieval of a UE in a 5GC, the method being performed by a second NF node (Lee, ¶[0053] “[0053] When the 3GPP network 200 includes an EPC as a core network, the 3GPP network 200 may include network nodes corresponding to a 5GC.” This represents a first node nodes therefore there is a second node), the method comprising: providing a request for data of the UE towards a first NF node (Lee, ¶[0047] “In the following description, a base station is an entity that allocates resources to terminals, and may be at least one of a gNode B, an eNode B, a Node B, a base station (BS), a wireless access unit, a base station controller, and a node on a network A terminal may include a user equipment (UE), a mobile station (MS), a cellular phone, a smartphone, a computer, or a multimedia system capable of performing communication functions. In the disclosure, a downlink (DL) may refer to a radio transmission path via which a base station transmits a signal to the terminal, and an uplink (UL) may refer to a radio transmission path via which a terminal transmits a signal to a base station.” And ¶[0053] “[0053] When the 3GPP network 200 includes an EPC as a core network, the 3GPP network 200 may include network nodes corresponding to a 5GC.” This represents a first node); and obtaining the data of the UE including an AAA server FQDN from the first NF node (Lee, ¶[0171] “layer or a domain address (FQDN) for generating an application layer address to the SMF 200 through the UE identifier and the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA server 500.” EU data identifier represents providing the data of the UE and AAA server “the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA” and (FQDN) for generating an application layer address represents FQDN towards the second NF node, as 200 has multiple nodes which would represent the first NF node, as there is no direct link expressed in the claim language, as to which defines first and second node). As per claim 10, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 9, further comprising: authenticating the data of the UE with an AAA server, wherein the AAA server is determined based on the AAA server FQDN (Lee, ¶ [0276] “In operation 1110, a UE 101 performs authentication with an authentication/authorization server using a user identifier or a generic public subscription identifier (GPSI: Identifier for identifying a subscriber).” This represents the authenticating of the data). As per claim 11, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 10, wherein determining the AAA server comprises retrieving a set of AAA server IP addresses from a DNS server by providing the AAA server FQDN to the DNS server (Lee, ¶ [0200] “1) A list of available edge application programs and configuration information required for the UE 100 in the edge application programs. For example, a DNS server address, the IP address of an edge application program, and an FQDN or a URL may be included.” retrieving a set of AAA server IP addresses). As per claim 12, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 9, wherein the method further comprises: storing a mapping between the AAA server FQDN and each IP address in the set of AAA server IP addresses (Lee, ¶ [0200] “1) A list of available edge application programs and configuration information required for the UE 100 in the edge application programs. For example, a DNS server address, the IP address of an edge application program, and an FQDN or a URL may be included.” each IP address in the set of AAA server IP addresses as it gathers it for IP). As per claim 13, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 11, wherein the method further comprises: providing an authentication request for the UE to the AAA server at one of the IP addresses in the set of AAA server IP addresses (Lee, ¶ [0200] “1) A list of available edge application programs and configuration information required for the UE 100 in the edge application programs. For example, a DNS server address, the IP address of an edge application program, and an FQDN or a URL may be included.” retrieving a set of AAA server IP addresses” and ¶ [0201] “2) A protocol for efficient network transmission with an edge application program and configuration information therefor, for example, TCP or UDP preference, IP version information, and HTTP protocol version information, may be included. In addition, configuration information for transport protocol optimization, for example, initial TCP CWND size information, may be further included.” This represents UE to the AAA server at one of the IP addresses in the set of AAA server IP addresses, since there is IP configuration happening in the edge network). As per claim 14, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 9, wherein the authentication request is for secondary authentication and authorization for the UE (Lee, ¶[0254] “FIG. 17 illustrates a case in which a core network 930 is a 5GC, and the core network may include an SMF 931, a PCF 932, and a UDM/authentication server function (AUSF) 933.” And ¶[0044] “[0044] FIG. 18 is a signal flowchart according to an authentication, configuration, and discovery procedure according to a centralized management MNO configuration according to the disclosure; and” showing 1110 first authentication request and then 1120 showing second authentication request). As per claim 15, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 14, wherein, if the AAA server cannot be reached at said one of the IP address in the set of AAA server IP addresses, the request is provided to another one of the IP address in the set of AAA server IP addresses (Lee, ¶[0201] “IP version information” if there is an IP version information AAA server cannot be reached at said one of the IP address as disclosed). As per claim 16, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 14, wherein providing the request for data is triggered by a previous failed attempt to contact the AAA server (Lee, fig.18 Bootstrapping represents failed attempt and 1020 is then triggered after as seen in the figure). As per claim 17, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the method according to claim 9, wherein the method is performed as part of a PDU session establishment procedure for the UE (Lee, ¶[0157] “According to FIG. 5, an edge data network generation procedure through a PDU session establishment procedure is performed according to the following operations.” The method is performed as part of a PDU session establishment procedure for the UE as seen in the figure EU and PDU generation procedure through a PDU session). As per claim 18, Lee teaches, the method according to claim 9, wherein the request for data is a request for Session Management Subscription Data Retrieval for the UE (Lee, ¶[0013] “Second, the 5GC can easily support a network virtualization paradigm by separating a mobility management function and a session management function. In existing 4G LTE, all terminals can receive services from a network through signaling exchange with a single core device called a mobility management entity (MME) that is in charge of registration, authentication, mobility management, and session management functions.” This represents the request for data is a request for Session Management Subscription Data Retrieval for the UE as all the functions are changed according to session management function). As per claim 23, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, a first NF node for data retrieval of a UE in a 5GC (Lee, ¶[0033] FIG. 7 illustrates a procedure in which a UE obtains LADN information through a registration procedure in a 5GC network” this represents a method for data retrieval as ¶[0254] “FIG. 17 illustrates a case in which a core network 930 is a 5GC, and the core network may include an SMF 931, a PCF 932, and a UDM/authentication server function (AUSF) 933.” And a UDM/authentication server is a given key part of data retrieval), the first NF node comprising processing circuitry, the processing circuitry being configured to cause the first NF node to ( (Lee, ¶[0047] “In the following description, a base station is an entity that allocates resources to terminals, and may be at least one of a gNode B, an eNode B, a Node B, a base station (BS), a wireless access unit, a base station controller, and a node on a network A terminal may include a user equipment (UE), a mobile station (MS), a cellular phone, a smartphone, a computer, or a multimedia system capable of performing communication functions. In the disclosure, a downlink (DL) may refer to a radio transmission path via which a base station transmits a signal to the terminal, and an uplink (UL) may refer to a radio transmission path via which a terminal transmits a signal to a base station.” And ¶[0053] “[0053] When the 3GPP network 200 includes an EPC as a core network, the 3GPP network 200 may include network nodes corresponding to a 5GC.” This represents a first node)): obtain a request for data of the UE from a second NF node (Lee, ¶ [0055] Network functions illustrated in FIG. 1 may be defined as follows. ¶ [0056] 3GPP network 300: May include a 3GPP radio access network and a core network.” NF is network function and ¶[0053] “the 3GPP network 200 may include network nodes corresponding to a 5GC.” 200 3GPP network 200 includes multiple nodes); retrieve the data of the UE including an AAA server FQDN (Lee, ¶ [0171] “The DN-AAA server 500 may transmit an application layer address (e.g., a URI) of an edge enabler server that the UE 100 accesses via an application layer or a domain address (FQDN) for generating an application layer address to the SMF 200 through the UE identifier and the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA server 500.” The DN-AAA server transmits and the UE 100 access via FQDN in the same manner as the application); and provide the data of the UE including the AAA server FQDN towards the second NF node (Lee, ¶[0171] “layer or a domain address (FQDN) for generating an application layer address to the SMF 200 through the UE identifier and the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA server 500.” EU data identifier represents providing the data of the UE and AAA server “the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA” and (FQDN) for generating an application layer address represents FQDN towards the second NF node, as 200 has multiple nodes which would represent the second NF node). Lee doesn’t clearly teach, Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) from a Unified Data Repository (UDR). However, Palanisamy teaches, a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) from a Unified Data Repository (UDR) (Palanisamy, ¶[0105] “In some cases, the SPR/UDR 116 may provide the FQDN of the SCSs.” This represents FQDN from UDR since UDR provides the FQDN. As far the User Data Repository" (UDR) and "Unified Data Repository" (UDR) meaning different things, they mean the same thing in telecom and 3GPP network architecture The term evolved from "User Data Repository" in older 3GPP standards to "Unified Data Repository" in 5G systems, though both refer to the exact same centralized database concept. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made to combine the teachings of Lee with those of Palanisamy to have a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN) from a Unified Data Repository (UDR). The motivation would have been to enable seamless and unambiguous service discovery through the Network Repository Function (NRF), allowing other network functions to securely and reliably locate the central database without hardcoding fragile IP addresses, therefore addressing reliability. As per claim 26, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, a second NF node for data retrieval of a UE in a 5GC (Lee, ¶[0053] “[0053] When the 3GPP network 200 includes an EPC as a core network, the 3GPP network 200 may include network nodes corresponding to a 5GC.” This represents a first node nodes therefore there is a second node), the second NF node comprising processing circuitry, the processing circuitry being configured to cause the second NF node to (Lee, fig.1 showing the circuitry that would be required to have second NF node and showing processing circuitry, and 200 representing the nodes): provide a request for data of the UE towards a first NF node (Lee, ¶[0047] “In the following description, a base station is an entity that allocates resources to terminals, and may be at least one of a gNode B, an eNode B, a Node B, a base station (BS), a wireless access unit, a base station controller, and a node on a network A terminal may include a user equipment (UE), a mobile station (MS), a cellular phone, a smartphone, a computer, or a multimedia system capable of performing communication functions. In the disclosure, a downlink (DL) may refer to a radio transmission path via which a base station transmits a signal to the terminal, and an uplink (UL) may refer to a radio transmission path via which a terminal transmits a signal to a base station.” And ¶[0053] “[0053] When the 3GPP network 200 includes an EPC as a core network, the 3GPP network 200 may include network nodes corresponding to a 5GC.” This represents a first node); and obtain the data of the UE including an AAA server FQDN from the first NF node (Lee, ¶[0171] “layer or a domain address (FQDN) for generating an application layer address to the SMF 200 through the UE identifier and the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA server 500.” EU data identifier represents providing the data of the UE and AAA server “the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA” and (FQDN) for generating an application layer address represents FQDN towards the second NF node, as 200 has multiple nodes which would represent the first NF node, as there is no direct link expressed in the claim language, as to which defines first and second node) and retrieving a set of AAA server Internet Protocol (IP) addresses using the AAA server FQDN; and providing an authentication request, for the UE, to an AAA server at one of the IP address in the set of AAA server IP addresses (Lee, ¶ [0171] “The DN-AAA server 500 may transmit an application layer address (e.g., a URI) of an edge enabler server that the UE 100 accesses via an application layer or a domain address (FQDN) for generating an application layer address to the SMF 200 through the UE identifier and the policy and the configuration information of the DN-AAA server 500.” And obtaining User Equipment (UE) data including an AAA server FQDN from a network function (NF) node, resolving IP addresses via FQDN, and routing an authentication request—is standard operational procedure in 5G service-based architectures (defined across 3GPP specifications like ETSI TS 129 503) ). As per claim 28, Lee in view of Palanisamy teaches, the second NF node according to claim 26, wherein the second NF node is further configured to perform operations comprising: authenticating the data of the UE with an AAA server, wherein the AAA server is determined based on the AAA server FQDN Lee, ¶[0276] “In operation 1110, a UE 101 performs authentication with an authentication/authorization server using a user identifier or a generic public subscription identifier (GPSI: Identifier for identifying a subscriber).” This represents the authenticating of the data). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2 and 25 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The limitation which is found in both claims “a first update request from a NEF node, wherein the update request comprises the AAA server FQDN; and providing a second update request to the UDR node with the AAA server FQDN” was not found in the prior art. In particular the second update request to the UDR node with the AAA server FQDN specifically. A close prior art is Baek (US 2022/0337995) mentions most of the components/nodes/steps to be able to achieve the objective in ¶ [0144] “In step 611, the AF/AAA server 640 forwards to the NEF 634 the prepared NPN subscription data to be provided to the UE 620 and the UDM/UDR 633.” However, not part of an update request and further the AAA and not AAA server FQDN. The current application would give added flexibility for different offering different network functions different functionalities via other network functions (NFs). Conclusion Note: Delos Reyes (US 2012/0084449) is of particular interest and also reads on the claim language Abstract “A device receives a PDN connection request from a UE, and exchanges, with a HSS, authentication and authorization information associated with the UE. The device also constructs an APN FQDN based on the authentication and authorization information, and sends a query, that includes the APN FQDN, to a DNS server.” More details on what each node is doing and what the sever is actually doing would be helpful to make progress in prosecution. Or more details as in claims 2 and 25 that was not found in the prior art, all of the connections were not found in the prior art and would add that level of detail to place the application in condition of allowance. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SANTIAGO GARCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5182. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chineyere Wills-Burns can be reached at (571) 272-9752. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SANTIAGO GARCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2673 /SG/
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 20, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 08, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749566
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING ELECTRONIC IMAGES
3y 1m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12743804
DETERIORATION DETERMINATION DEVICE, DETERIORATION DETERMINATION METHOD, AND PROGRAM
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12738061
DYNAMICALLY COMPOSABLE OBJECT TRACKER CONFIGURATION FOR INTELLIGENT VIDEO ANALYTICS SYSTEMS
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12731423
CIRCUIT BOARD PROCESSING SYSTEM USING FRAGMENTED SEARCH REGION IMAGE ANALYSIS
2y 8m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12718530
MODULAR MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEMS, DATABASES, METHODS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR DEVELOPING AND DEPLOYING AUTOMATED IMAGE SEGMENTATION PROGRAMS
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+13.6%)
2y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1033 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month