Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/289,847

A BUMPER BEAM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Examiner
BLANKENSHIP, GREGORY A
Art Unit
3612
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Autotech Engineering S L
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
1388 granted / 1629 resolved
+33.2% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1677
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1629 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is not clearly understood because the phrase “in the recess the first longitudinal side” is unclear. The phrase is either missing punctuation or at least one word. Claim 2 is not clearly understood because the phrase “the inner space the first longitudinal side” is unclear. The phrase is either missing punctuation or at least one word. Claim 3 is not clearly understood because the phrase “one or more of the recess and inner space the first longitudinal side” is unclear. The phrase is either missing punctuation or at least one word. Claim 4 is not clearly understood because the phrase “the recess the first longitudinal side” is unclear. The phrase is either missing punctuation or at least one word. Claim 5 is not clearly understood because the phrase “the inner space the first longitudinal side” is unclear. The phrase is either missing punctuation or at least one word. Claim 6 is not clearly understood because “the region” lacks a clear antecedent basis. Claim 13 is not clearly understood because “a few millimeters” is not clear. The examiner suggests using –at least two millimeters--. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-17 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: The primary reason for indicating allowable subject matter of claim 1 is the combination of the first longitudinal side is unwelded to the second side wall in the recess and the second longitudinal side is welded to the closed hollow structure, which is not found in the prior art of record. The closest prior art is WO 2015/160298 which has the first longitudinal side welded to the second side wall in the recess. JP 2000343163 teaches both longitudinal ends in a recess without any welding. Neither reference can be combined with the other without breaking the other reference. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GREGORY A BLANKENSHIP whose telephone number is (571)272-6656. The examiner can normally be reached 7-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amy Weisberg can be reached at 571-270-5500. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GREGORY A. BLANKENSHIP Primary Examiner Art Unit 3612 /GREGORY A BLANKENSHIP/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600310
FRONT END MODULE FRAME OF VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600414
VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600321
DEFROSTER INTERIOR STRUCTURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600417
TAILGATE ACCESSIBILITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594899
STRUCTURAL MEMBER FOR FRONT BOX WITH INTEGRAL FLUID LINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+2.9%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1629 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month