Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 30, 2026
Application No. 18/292,883

DYNAMIC STEERING OF DATA-PARALLEL WORKLOADS BETWEEN ACCELERATORS

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 26, 2024
Priority
Jul 27, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTIB2021056829
Examiner
SUN, CHARLIE
Art Unit
2198
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
2 (Final)
91%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 91% — above average
91%
Career Allowance Rate
461 granted / 505 resolved
+36.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
517
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
§103
45.1%
+5.1% vs TC avg
§102
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 505 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION In light of compact prosecution, applicant was contacted on 8/3 for an examiner’s amendment. The examiner’s voice mail was not returned. This OA is thus issued. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. As per claim 1, it is not clear where written description exists for “wherein the workload request includes information on the task to execute, input data, output data and runtime parameters”. [0039] of the spec recites: “Each request includes information on the task (e.g., kernel) to execute, the input data, the output buffer and runtime parameters”. Perhaps it is a mistake. Applicant meant to say output buffer? Claims 2-10 are rejected by virtue of base claims. As per claim 11, see rejection on claim 1. As per claim 12, see rejection on claim 1. Claims 13-20 are rejected by virtue of base claims. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLIE SUN whose telephone number is (571)270-5100. The examiner can normally be reached 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Pierre Vital can be reached at (571) 272-4215. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHARLIE SUN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2198
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 26, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 27, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12717625
RESOURCE ALLOCATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12717635
METHOD, APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR WORKLOAD DEPLOYMENT IN CLOUD SYSTEM INCLUDING FUNCTION ACCELERATOR CARD
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710994
DISTRIBUTED OPERATING SYSTEM IMPLEMENTED WITHIN A COMPUTER CLUSTER
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12711001
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADAPTIVE EVENT FORWARDING
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12688074
DYNAMIC COMPUTING RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
91%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.5%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 505 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month