Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/293,524

METHOD FOR ANTIFUNGAL TREATMENT OF TURF

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 30, 2024
Priority
Jul 30, 2021 — FR 21/08325 +1 more
Examiner
MASKELL, MICHAEL P
Art Unit
2878
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Team Green Light
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
924 granted / 1073 resolved
+18.1% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
1083
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
24.8%
-15.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1073 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) as being indefinite and failing to point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention, because the claim language “over a period which could range up to 12 months or more” (emphasis added) renders it impossible to determine the range of time claimed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Karpinski, et al (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2013/0255150 A1). Regarding claim 1, Karpinski discloses a method for the antifungal treatment of a turf, comprising a step consisting in applying blue light on said turf (paragraph 0058). Regarding claim 2, Karpinski discloses wherein the wavelength of the blue light is comprised between 380 and 500 nm (abstract). Regarding claim 3, Karpinski discloses wherein the blue light is applied so that the luminous flux per unit area of the turf is comprised between 20 and 50 W/cm^2 (paragraph 0048). Regarding claim 4, Karpinski discloses wherein the blue light is applied for a time period comprised between 0.3 seconds and 1 hour 29 minutes (paragraph 0019). Regarding claim 5, Karpinski discloses wherein the blue light is applied during the day and/or during the night (it is always either day or night, therefore the claim does not further limit its parent claim). Regarding claim 6, Karpinski discloses wherein the blue light is applied at a frequency of 1 to 60 application(s) per month, over one or several days, consecutive or not, over a period which could range up to 12 months or more (paragraph 0058). Regarding claim 7, Karpinski discloses wherein the blue light is applied by means of light source(s) selected from the group constituted by LEDs and OLEDs (paragraph 0057). Regarding claim 8, Karpinski discloses wherein the light source(s) are arranged on a support tool, automated or not (Fig. 2). Regarding claim 9, the particular species of the fungi does not limit the claimed method, as it neither adds a step nor does it modify an existing step. Regarding claim 10, the particular type of turf that the method is performed upon does not limit the claimed method, as it neither adds a step nor does it modify an existing step. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL P MASKELL whose telephone number is (571)270-3210. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 10A-6P. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Georgia Epps can be reached at 571-272-2328. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MICHAEL MASKELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2878 7 March 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2024
Application Filed
Mar 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640357
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING FLOW THROUGH AN OPEN PORT INTERFACE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640332
BLANKER-ENHANCED MOIRE IMAGING
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633494
Stage Device, Charged Particle Beam Device, and Vacuum Device
2y 5m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12625118
IDLE-TRIGGERED DIAGNOSTICS FOR SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
2y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12617713
SUBSTRATE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SUBSTRATE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING UNIT CELL
2y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.2%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1073 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month