Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Team Green Light

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Team Green Light currently has 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and a single distinct art unit, representing a focused prosecution effort. Such a concentrated profile suggests that the company is prioritizing a specific semiconductor or optical innovation in its current dealings with the patent office.

The busiest examiner, MASKELL, MICHAEL P, is handling the pending action. With only the 1 pending office action in the entire portfolio, the company's current patent strategy is concentrated on a single application, making the specific examiner's feedback the primary factor in their immediate prosecution timeline. Practitioners should note that the reliance on a single examiner within the 1 distinct art unit means the company's immediate success in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector depends entirely on the outcome of this examination, with no other pending matters to provide alternative paths for protection.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MASKELL, MICHAEL P 1 86.1% +9.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18293524 METHOD FOR ANTIFUNGAL TREATMENT OF TURF MASKELL, MICHAEL P 14d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2878 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18293524 METHOD FOR ANTIFUNGAL TREATMENT OF TURF MASKELL, MICHAEL P 2878 §102 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jan 30, 2024

Managing Team Green Light's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month