Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/294,404

APPARATUS COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE PROCESSOR

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 01, 2024
Priority
Aug 05, 2021 — IN 202141035325 +1 more
Examiner
ACOLATSE, KODZOVI
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nokia Corporation
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
777 granted / 929 resolved
+25.6% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
985
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
85.1%
+45.1% vs TC avg
§102
12.1%
-27.9% vs TC avg
§112
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 929 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 17-28 are pending in this office action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to amendment filed 04/22/2026 have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 17-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Xu et al (US 2023/0261738 A1) in view of Ntsonde et al (US 2006/0135091 A1). Regarding claim 17, Xu teaches an apparatus, comprising at least one processor, and at least one memory storing instructions, the at least one memory and the instructions configured to, with the at least one processor, cause a network device (Xu: Fig. 2:160-1, satellite 160/network device), which provides a first radio cell (Xu: Fig. 2:210-1, cell 210-1/first cell). Xu does not explicitly disclose the network device broadcast to at least one terminal device, a first information characterizing a radio coverage of at least one further radio cell of at least one further network device, which at least temporarily and at least partially covers a neighbor area of the first radio cell. Ntsonde teaches the network device broadcast to at least one terminal device a first information characterizing a radio coverage of at least one further radio cell of at least one further network device, which at least temporarily and at least partially covers a neighbor area of the first radio cell (Ntsonde: Fig. 1; [0019]; [0043], satellite SC broadcast information about secondary coverage areas of base stations N1/further network device). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Xu wherein the network device broadcasts to a least one terminal device a first information characterizing a radio coverage of at least one further radio cell of at least one further network device, which at least temporarily and at least partially covers a neighbor area of the first radio cell as disclosed by Ntsonde to provide a system for managing priority information for radio communication terminal in a hybrid network comprising cellular network and satellite network (Ntsonde: [0014]). Regarding claim 23, Xu teaches a method comprising: a network device (Xu: Fig. 2:160-1, satellite 160/network device), which provides a first radio cell (Xu: Fig. 2:210-1, cell 210-1/first cell). Xu does not explicitly disclose the network device broadcasting to at least one terminal device a first information characterizing a radio coverage of at least one further radio cell of at least one further network device, which at least temporarily and at least partially covers a neighbor area of the first radio cell. Ntsonde teaches the network device broadcasting to at least one terminal device a first information characterizing a radio coverage of at least one further radio cell of at least one further network device, which at least temporarily and at least partially covers a neighbor area of the first radio cell (Ntsonde: Fig. 1; [0019]; [0043], satellite SC broadcast information about secondary coverage areas of base stations N1/further network device). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Xu wherein the network device broadcasts to at least terminal device a first information characterizing a radio coverage of at least one further radio cell of at least one further network device, which at least temporarily and at least partially covers a neighbor area of the first radio cell as disclosed by Ntsonde to provide a system for managing priority information for radio communication terminal in a hybrid network comprising cellular network and satellite network (Ntsonde: [0014]). Regarding claim 18, Xu teaches wherein at least one of the network device and the at least one further network device is a mobile network device, for example a non- terrestrial network device (Xu: Fig. 2; [0053], satellite is a mobile NTN). Regarding claims 19 and 25, Xu teaches wherein the first information comprises at least one of: a) first position information) characterizing at least one position of the at least one further network device (Xu: Fig. 2; [0053], orbital location/position of the satellite), b) a timestamp (TIM) characterizing a time and/or date on which the at least one further network device is at the at least one position (POS- 1), c) second position information (POS-2) characterizing at least one center position of the at least one further radio cell (C-2), d) a time difference (TIM-DIFF) between two points in time, wherein each of the two points in time is associated with a respective position of the at least one further network device or a respective center position of the at least one further radio cell (C-2), e) an estimated coverage radius (COV-RAD) of the at least one further radio cell (C-2), f) a first indicator (IND-1) indicating that an estimated coverage radius (COV-RAD) of the at least one further radio cell (C-2) is at least similar to a coverage radius of the first radio cell (C-1), g) first angle-based position information (POS-3a) characterizing at least one angle at which a trajectory of the at least one further network device passes a circle centered at at least one of a center of the first radio cell (C-1) or a current position of the network device, h) second angle-based positioninformation (POS-3b) characterizing at least one angle at which a trajectory of the at least one further network device leaves a circle centered at at least one of a center of the first radio cell (C- 1) or a current position of the network device. Regarding claim 20, Xu teaches wherein the first information characterizes at least one of: a) a radio coverage of a predetermined first number of further radio cells of the at least one further network device, which will at least temporarily cover the neighbor area (NA) of the first radio cell within a predetermined first time interval (TI-1) (Xu: Fig. 2; [0053]-[0058]), b) a radio coverage of a predetermined second number of further radio cells of the at least one further network device, which will at least temporarily cover the neighbor area (NA) of the first radio cell within a predetermined second time interval following the first time interval. Regarding claim 21, Xu teaches wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the network device to indicate a change of the first information (Xu: Fig. 2; [0052], [0061], gateway indicating to the base station changes in satellite location information). Regarding claims 22 and 26, Xu teaches wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the network device to: receive a request for transmission of the first information (Xu: Fig. 2; [0073], base station communicates/request with the gateway to update the satellite information). Regarding claim 24, Xu teaches an apparatus, comprising at least one processor, and at least one memory storing instructions, the at least one memory and the instructions configured to, with the at least one processor, cause a terminal device served by a first network device in a first radio cell to receive a first information characterizing a radio coverage of at least one further radio cell of at least one further network device, which at least temporarily and at least partially covers a neighbor area of the first radio cell (Xu: Fig. 2; [0073], base station communicates/request with the gateway to update the satellite information). Regarding claim 27, Xu teaches wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the terminal device to perform, based at least partially on the first information, at least one of: a) controlling an operation of the terminal device (Xu: Fig. 2; [0053]-[0554], initiate a paging procedure of the UEs), b) entering a sleep state, c) waking up from a sleep state. Regarding claim 28, Xu teaches wherein the instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the terminal device to: determine one or more time windows with radio coverage provided by at least one of a) the network device and/or b) the at least one further network device (Xu: Figs. 2 and 5; [0053], [0064], [0081] determining coverage at a given time). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KODZOVI ACOLATSE whose telephone number is (571)270-1999. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 10 am to 6pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Avellino Joseph can be reached at (571) 272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KODZOVI ACOLATSE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 01, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 22, 2026
Response Filed
May 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684535
SHARED RESOURCE POOLS BETWEEN TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION POINTS WITH USER EQUIPMENT ASSISTANCE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677186
REALLOCATION OF PROCESSING LOAD BETWEEN BASEBAND UNITS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677268
METHODS FOR INSERTING AND EXTRACTING OPERATIONS, ADMINISTRATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF TRANSMITTING END, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12672135
CONFIGURATION INFORMATION SENDING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND REDUNDANCY VERSION RV VALUE DETERMINING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12652705
RANDOM ACCESS METHOD AND APPARATUS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.4%)
2y 6m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 929 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month