Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/297,582

DISPLAY DEVICE, AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 07, 2023
Priority
Jun 29, 2012 — RE 10-2012-0071375 +4 more
Examiner
WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE
Art Unit
1781
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
184 granted / 402 resolved
-19.2% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
457
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
58.5%
+18.5% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 402 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Examiner Notes Claims 1-3 and 6-22 are currently pending, of which claims 13-21 are withdrawn. Claim 1 is currently amended. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6-12, and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) as anticipated by Huang et al. (US 2010/0103138). Regarding claims 1, 6, and 11, Huang discloses a manufacturing method and structure of a curved capacitive touch panel for electronic devices or equipment (i.e., display device) (0008, 0009, and 0055) including a glass substrate (i.e., cover window) having a first surface (11) on which an image is displayed, a second surface (22) opposite the first surface and a third surface connecting the first and the second surfaces; the glass substrate comprising a plurality of curved portions and a flat portion extending from each curved portion (Fig. 19). A flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) with capacitive touch sensing/detecting capability (20; i.e., a panel member) entirely on the second surface of the cover window and end of the panel member covering a portion of the cover window and exposes another portion of the second surface of the curved portion of the cover window (Fig. 8, 0055). PNG media_image1.png 274 585 media_image1.png Greyscale In the combined embodiments, the flat portion would be between opposite exposed portion of the second surface of the curved portion of the cover window as claimed. Regarding claim 2, Fig. 8 of Huang discloses the panel member being smaller in at least one of a length or a width than the cover window. PNG media_image2.png 167 510 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 3, Huang discloses an adhesive layer between the panel member and cover window (0051-0052, 0060). Regarding claim 7, as can be seen from Fig. 19, the FPCB extends along the inner surface of the glass substrate and therefore has a first panel portion laminated on the flat central portion and a second panel portion extending in a curved shape from the first panel portion and laminated on the curved peripheral portion (Fig. 19, 0051-0052). Regarding claims 8 and 9, the glass substrate of Fig. 19 has a curved portion, having a curvature radius and center flat portion have a different curvature radius from the curved portion (Fig. 19). Regarding claim 10, the FPCB is formed on a recessed outer surface of the cover window. Regarding claim 12, the panel member of Huang is a flexible printed circuit board (0009). Regarding claim 22, Huang discloses a manufacturing method and structure of a curved capacitive touch panel for electronic devices or equipment (i.e., display device) (0008, 0009, and 0055) including glass substrate (i.e., cover window) having a first surface (11) on which an image is displayed, a second surface opposite (22) the first surface and a third surface connecting the first and the second surface (e.g., Fig. 1, Fig. 8, 0055). A flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) with capacitive touch sensing/detecting capability (20; i.e., a panel member) which may be integrated onto a display panel (0055) entirely on the second surface of the cover window and end of the panel member covering a portion of the cover window and exposes another portion of the second surface of the curved portion of the cover window (Fig. 8). Claim 22 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) as anticipated by Spruit (US 4,766,498). Regarding claim 22, Spruit discloses an image projection system comprising a concave display window (21’) having a first surface (e.g., front) on which an image is displayed, a second surface (e.g., back) opposite the first surface and a third surface (e.g., side) connecting the first and the second surfaces (Fig. 4). The window comprising a curved portion (Fig. 4) and a display panel (27’) on the entirety of the back surface, where an end of the display panel on the curved portion covers a portion and exposes another portion of the second surface of the curved portion (Fig. 4, column 6, lines 5-20). Response to Arguments Applicant argues that Huang does not anticipate or suggest wherein the flat portion is between opposite exposed portions of the second surface of the curved portion of the cover window as Huang does not disclose one embodiment having the features. Huang teaches that while specific embodiments have been illustrated and described that those skilled in the art will appreciated that various modification can be made without departing form the scope of the present invention (0068). Furthermore, Huang does not disparage combining their disclosed embodiments. Fig. 19 of Huang teaches a curved glass substrate which includes a flat central portion extending from curved portions. Fig. 8 of Huang teaches an end of the panel member which is shorter than that of the cover window. In the combination of the disclosed embodiments, the claimed structure of the flat portion being between opposite exposed portions of the second surface of the curved portion of the cover window is taught. Applicant argues that Spruit does not disclose a "display device" having "a cover window" and a "display panel" on a surface of the cover window as Spruit is directed to an image projection system. The image projection system of Spruit is a display device. Spruit describes the image projection system having a display screen arranged on a display window. A display window is analogous to the claimed cover window and a display screen is analogous to the claimed display panel. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALICIA WEYDEMEYER whose telephone number is (571)270-1727. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9-4. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at 571-270-1547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALICIA J WEYDEMEYER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 3 earlier events
Sep 04, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 04, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 14, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jan 08, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12698232
FOLDABLE COVER ARTICLE WITH REDUCED HAZARDOUS PROJECTIONS
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12649618
THERMALLY INSULATED AIR CARGO CONTAINER
2y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12629915
FIREPROOF MATERIAL USED FOR LITHIUM BATTERY MODULE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628388
Monocrystalline SIC Substrates Having an Asymmetrical Geometry and Method of Producing Same
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612821
VACUUM INSULATED PANEL WITH IMPROVED THERMAL PERFORMANCE PROXIMATE EDGE OF GLASS DURING ASYMMETRIC THERMAL CONDITIONS
2y 0m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+27.8%)
3y 5m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 402 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month