Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/298,790

DEEP SMOOTH ETCHING TO REALIZE SCALABLE DEVICES HAVING PIEZOELECTRIC CRYSTALS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 11, 2023
Priority
Apr 12, 2022 — provisional 63/330,103
Examiner
DEO, DUY VU NGUYEN
Art Unit
1700
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia LLC
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
859 granted / 1042 resolved
+17.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
1058
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
44.7%
+4.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1042 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II, claims 11-16 in the reply filed on September 10, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-10 and 187- 20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to nonelected inventions, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Drawings Replacement drawings were received on September 10, 2025. These drawings are acceptable. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by US Patent Application Publication 2023/0290834 as filed by Xie et al. (hereinafter, Xie). Xie teaches forming a first mask (32) on a piezoelectric material (10) and forming a second mask (34) on the first mask. Xie teaches patterning the first mask using the second mask (see step 506 in FIG. 5). Xie teaches wet etching the piezoelectric material using the patterned first mask and forming structures of the piezoelectric material having vertical sidewalls (see, for example, FIG. 5 and [0039]). Claims 11 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)1) and 102(1)(2) as being anticipated by US Patent Application Publication 2015/0380637 as filed by Jiang et al. (hereinafter, Jiang). Jiang teaches forming a mask (124) on a piezoelectric material (106). Jiang teaches mask may be multilayered thereby corresponding to the claimed first mask and second mask in which the first mask is patterned using the second mask (see, for example, FIG. 1F and [0017]). Jiang teaches wet etching the piezoelectric material using the patterned first mask and forming piezoelectric material (136) having vertical sidewalls (see, for example, FIG. 1I., [0020] and [0027]). Regarding claim 12, Jiang teaches annealing the patterned first mask before wet etching the piezoelectric material (see, for example, [0018] and [0019]). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 13-16 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 13, the prior art of record does not teach or make obvious a process, within the context of claim 1, wherein the first mask layer is etched using an inductively coupled plasma dry etch. Regarding claim 14, the prior art of record does not teach or make obvious a process, within the context of claim 1, wherein the first mask is a silicon oxide disposed on a ScAlN piezoelectric material. Regarding claims 15 and 16, the prior art of record does not teach or make obvious a process, within the context of claim 1, wherein a ScAlN layer is wet etched through a patterned hard mask stack comprising a bottom silicon oxide layer disposed on the ScAlN and a upper nickel layer disposed on the silicon oxide layer. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US Patent Application Publication 2019/0079453 (Haemmerli et al.) Haemmerli discloses forming a first mask on a piezoelectric material and forming a second mask on the first mask. Haemmerli teaches patterning the first mask using the second mask. Haemmerli teaches wet etching the piezoelectric material using the patterned first mask and forming structures of the piezoelectric material having vertical sidewalls (see, for example, [0046], [0049] and claim 18). Haemmerli does not teach the piezoelectric material being etched is disposed on a substrate. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Allan W Olsen whose telephone number is (571)272-1441. The examiner can normally be reached variable; M-F 9-7. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Parviz Hassanzadeh can be reached at 571-272-1435. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ALLAN W. OLSEN Primary Examiner Art Unit 1716 /Allan W. Olsen/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1716
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 11, 2023
Application Filed
Nov 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Feb 23, 2026
Response Filed
Aug 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707936
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700567
MULTI-STATE RF PULSING IN CYCLING RECIPES TO REDUCE CHARGING INDUCED DEFECTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12696696
DIELECTRIC DENSIFICATION
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12696702
COMPOSITION FOR TREATING SEMICONDUCTOR AND METHOD FOR TREATING OBJECT TO BE TREATED
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12665171
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SELECTIVELY REMOVING MATERIAL AT AN EDGE OF A SUBSTRATE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+7.0%)
2y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1042 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month