Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/303,035

BATTERY AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE HAVING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Apr 19, 2023
Examiner
WALKE, AMANDA C
Art Unit
1722
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Ningde Amperex Technology Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1488 granted / 1681 resolved
+23.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1733
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
51.0%
+11.0% vs TC avg
§102
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
§112
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1681 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7, 9, 10, and 14-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kobayashi (JP 2011-238569 and its machine translation). Kobayashi discloses a battery comprising a housing and a battery cell in the housing (case 10, cell 50; figures 1 and 2, [0022]), including parts equivalent to the instantly claimed first and second housing body (case 10, lid 17, and case body 11, having bottom 12; figure 2, [0026],[0027])), wherein one housing body (second housing body, lid 17) is mounted on the first housing body 11, and are electrically insulated from one another (see annular gasket PK made of an insulating resin; [0023]). The battery cell comprises a positive electrode plate 60, a negative electrode plate 70 (first and second electrode plates) each comprising a current collector (electrode foils 62, 72), ad active material layers 61 and 71, and a separator 80 between the plates. The battery is a wound electrode body (50) obtained by winding the plates and separator around a core material 30 The battery case 10 is made of metal, with the main body 11 having a case bottom 12, wherein the positive electrode plate 60 through the core material 30 is electrically connected to the lid 17 via conductive metal 32Y (connecting a housing member and electrode plate), and wherein the case bottom is electrically connected to the negative electrode plate through the metal core bottom portion 31 and cylindrical metal part 32X (conductive such as copper; [0029]), wherein 32X and 32Y are isolated from each other via 32Z, a resin portion . Therefore, the reference device includes parts equating to the first and second conductive members, which are electrically isolated from each other, wherein one connects the lid 17 and the positive electrode plate via conductive 32Y, and the other connects the negative electrode plate the body bottom 12 via conductive 32X, isolated via resin body 32Z in the core 30 (figure 2, 3, [0028]-[0032]; also instant positioning hole of the conductive members as required by the instant claim 14). Additionally, the starting end of the plate 60 and the starting end of the plate 70 are located between the conductive members 32X and 32Y (figure 3). Therefore, the device as disclosed by the reference teaches the claimed features as set forth by the instant claim 1. With respect to the instant claim 3, the positive and negative electrode current collectors 62 and 72 comprise a portion having an active material coating thereon (see figures 4 and 5, exposed portions 62f and 72f, blank foil regions) and the uncoated portions 62f is connected to the conductive member 32Y, and the uncoated portion 72f is connected to conductive member 32X as required by the instant claim 3 ([0027], [0030], [0031]). Instant claim 4 requires the connecting surfaces wherein 62f and 32Y and 72f and 32X connect to face toward each other, and as seen in figures 4 and 6, the blank foil portions (uncoated) 62f and 72f are connected to 32Y and 32X in a manner wherein the portions face one another via core 30, and the instant claim 5 wherein the two connecting surfaces together form a conductive structure (32). The uncoated regions 62f and 72f have a surface area smaller than that of the conductive regions 32Y and 32X (see below wherein they extend beyond the connecting region; instant claim 6). The widths of the uncoated regions are the same, meeting the limitations of the instant claim 9. PNG media_image1.png 644 434 media_image1.png Greyscale The separators 80 of the electrode assemblies are positioned between the connecting portion regions which include 62f and 72f (see figure 4 and 6; instant claim 7), and wherein the electrodes are wound in the same direction between the conductive portions as required by the instant claim 2. PNG media_image2.png 410 408 media_image2.png Greyscale As seen in the drawings above, the conductive portions 32Y and 32 X each include an end connected to housing body 17, and an end disposed opposite, and one end connected to the housing 12, with and portion disposed opposite, wherein the direction of the winding axis of the cell the end of 32Y extend beyond that in one direction than 32X, and 32X extends beyond 32Y (in the winding direction, 32X extends beyond 32Y toward 12, and 32Y extends beyond 32X toward 17), therefore meeting the limitations of the instant claim 10. The conductive portions are on hollow core 30, wherein the hollow core is a positioning hole, further comprising a winding pin at the end on the hollow core (near 32X, WP) as required by the instant claim 14. The cell has a general shape in the width direction of a cylinder, thus meeting the limitations of the instant claims 15 and 16 for a geometric shape, and a circle ([0022]). Claim 17 is drawn to an electronic apparatus comprising the battery as is clearly described by the reference (including figure 12). Claims 18-20 are dependent upon claim 17, and present the limitations as set forth for the instant claims 2-4, discussed above. Therefore, the device of the reference teaches the limitations of the instant claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 8 and 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kobayashi in view of Viavattine et al (2011/0247204). Kobayashi has been discussed above. The reference teaches a wound battery, preferably cylindrical, for a variety of applications. The reference teaches an insulating resin portion 32Z, but fails to specifically disclose the resin. Viavattine et al disclose a rechargeable wound battery wherein the reference teaches that an insulating materials suitable for battery applications include resins- ethylene/ tetrafluoroethylene, polyethylene, polypropylene, PET, polyimide, and Teflon ([0059], [0070]). The instant specification teaches that suitable “insulating glue” material between the two conductive areas include polyimide, PTFE (Teflon), PET, and polypropylene (see instant specification [0056]). The reference further teaches that typical wound cell rechargeable batteries typically have sizes of widths of about 0.2 to 2 inches (5.08 to 50.8 mm99) and the pins which extend through the cell lid to the base wherein the electrode assembly is wound around has a length of about 0.4 to 1 inch (10.16 to 25.4 mm), including a portion extending outside of the case ([0045], [0046], figure 5). Therefore, it can be estimated that a suitable height of a battery case having an electrode assembly wound around it would reasonably be within the claimed range of each connecting portion (32Y and 32X of the primary reference) to be about 2mm or less given the length taught at typical for the pins (similar to the hollow core 30) and the portion covered by the connected portions and the electrode assembly. Therefore, given the teachings of the references, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of the instant invention to prepare the material of Kobayashi, choosing as the insulating resin for 32Z, that as taught by Viavattine et al to be known and useful in the art, which would meet the limitations of the instant claims for the “insulating glue”. Additionally, given the teachings of Viavattine et al for typical battery part and electrode sizes as known in the art, one of ordinary skill in the art would have prepared the device of Kobayashi et al, choosing a battery of similar size such as having a pin/ similar to core 30 with portions 32 of about 10mm with an about 5 mm electrode assembly (leaving about 5 mm for the conductive portions, connecting portions am, that extending to the lid), wherein the resultant battery would include the hollow core 30, having the electrode assembly wound around it, with conductive connecting portions, and conductive portions of each conductive portion 32Y and 32X extending beyond the connection portions (and electrode assembly) would have a length of about 2mm or less each. The resultant device would also meet the limitations of the instant claims. Alternatively, one of ordinary skill in the art would have arrived at the claimed length given the teachings of the references for the device structure of Kobayashi and the teachings of conventional battery sizes of Viavattine et al, through routine experimentation to achieve a battery having features and lengths/ sizes resulting in optimal battery overcharge protection. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 12 and 13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 12 and 13 require that there is a fixed portion which electrically isolates the end portions from the housing bodies, disposed between the cell and the hosuing, however, the primary reference requires that the conductive portions extend from the cells to the lib and housing bottom, wherein there cannot be an electrically isolating portion between the cells and the housing to isolate the end portions of 32X and 32Y. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMANDA C WALKE whose telephone number is (571)272-1337. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Thursday 5:30am to 4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Niki Bakhtiari can be reached at 571-272-3433. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AMANDA C. WALKE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1722
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 19, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597614
HYBRID ELECTRODES FOR BATTERY CELLS AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596306
PHOTOCHEMICAL AND THERMAL RELEASE LAYER PROCESSES AND USES IN DEVICE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597635
ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12586855
Battery Module and Battery Pack Including the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584023
COMPOSITION FOR FORMING ORGANIC FILM, PATTERNING PROCESS, AND COMPOUND
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+8.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1681 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month