Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/314,144

CIRCUIT BOARD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF, AND LIGHT EMITTING MODULE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 09, 2023
Priority
Jan 09, 2023 — CN 202310025285.3 +1 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, DONGHAI D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Hannstar Display Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
666 granted / 884 resolved
+5.3% vs TC avg
Strong +29% interview lift
Without
With
+29.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
902
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
75.7%
+35.7% vs TC avg
§102
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 884 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1-2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by U.S. Patent 9,042,113 to Kim. This rejection is set forth in the previous Office Action, dated 05/21/25. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 3-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of U.S. Patent8,878,077 to Ito et al. This rejection is set forth in the previous Office Action, dated 05/21/25. Claims 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim in view of U.S. Patent 8,309,860 to Sunohara et al. This rejection is set forth in the previous Office Action, dated 05/21/25 Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed July 29, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argued that “Kim fails to teach or suggest the feature “wherein the solder resist layer has a solder resist opening exposing a portion of the second circuit layer” in the claim 1. The Examiner disagrees because the solder resist layer (180) having opening exposing a portion of the second circuit layer (170) as shown in Fig. 19. Applicant argued that “Since the first solder resist 180 is formed on the upper portion of the second insulating layer 140 before the outer circuit layer 170 is formed on the upper portion of the second insulating layer 140, Kim does not teach or suggest the feature “the solder resist layer has a solder resist opening exposing a portion of the second circuit layer” in the claim 1”. This is wrong, because the solder resist layer (180) is formed after (not before as argue) the second circuit 170 is formed (see Figs. 18-19). The Examiner also notices that Applicant's argument that the references fail to show certain features of the invention, it is noted that the features upon which applicant relies (i.e., “solder resist layer is not formed on an upper portion of the outer circuit layer”) are not recited in the rejected claim(s). Although the claims are interpreted in light of the specification, limitations from the specification are not read into the claims. See In re Van Geuns, 988 F.2d 1181, 26 USPQ2d 1057 (Fed. Cir. 1993). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DONGHAI D NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-4566. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sunil K. Singh can be reached at 571-272-3460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DN/ /DONGHAI D NGUYEN/November 1, 2025 Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2023
Application Filed
May 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 29, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 05, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12641731
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING CONDUCTIVE CIRCUIT BOARD AND CONDUCTIVE CIRCUIT BOARD MADE THEREFROM
3y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12641728
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUBSTRATE WITH BUILT-IN COMPONENTS, AND SUBSTRATE WITH BUILT-IN COMPONENTS
3y 3m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633452
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PRODUCING WOUND CORE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12627124
A WIRE BUNDLE FORMING APPARATUS
3y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628326
A COMPONENT STORAGE SYSTEM, A COMPONENT STOREHOUSE AND A MAGAZINE PREPARATION METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+29.3%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 884 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month