Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/319,564

FLUOROPOLYMER AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 18, 2023
Examiner
LEE, RIP A
Art Unit
1762
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Daikin Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1119 granted / 1345 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Minimal -5% lift
Without
With
+-4.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1381
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
31.8%
-8.2% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
24.4%
-15.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1345 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 3-7, and 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yamanaka et al. (US 12,492,271; relying on foreign priority date of November 19, 2019). Example 1 of Yamanaka et al. teaches preparation of a homopolymer of a perfluoroallyl ether monomer CH2=CF-CF2O-CF(CF3)COOH using 0.5 mole % of ammonium persulfate as the initiator. The amount of monomer (220 g in 513 g aqueous medium) is 43 % based on the amount of aqueous medium. Polymerization is carried under a nitrogen atmosphere. According to inventors, the oxygen content in a nitrogen atmosphere is 500 ppm by volume or less (col. 27, line 45). A crude product is subjected to ultrafiltration to remove dimer and trimer (less than 1 ppm) resulting in a homopolymer having a weight average molecular weight of 18 × 104 and a number average molecular weight of 14 × 104. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nanba et al. (US 12,503,527; relying on foreign priority date of November 19, 2019). Nanba et al. teaches preparation of a polymer of a perfluoroallyl ether monomer (11) having general formula CX2=CY-CF2-O-Rf-A wherein at least one of X and Y is F, Rf is a fluorine-containing alkylene group having 1 to 40 carbon atoms, and A is -COOM, -SO3M, -OSO3M, or -C(CF3)2OM, where M is H, a metal atom, NR4, imidazolium, pyridinium, or phosphonium (col. 21, line 36). Polymerization is carried out in the presence of an initiator (ammonium persulfate) at an initiator concentration of 0.0001 to 10 % by mass (col. 25, line 28; col. 26, line 3). Polymerization is carried out in aqueous medium at an oxygen concentration of 500 ppm volume or less, with an optimal oxygen concentration of 50 ppm by volume or less (col. 23, line 58; col. 24, line 1) and at a reaction temperature of 59 ºC or lower (col. 24, line 7). The amount of monomer (11) at the outset of polymerization is 40 % by mass or more based on the amount of aqueous medium (col. 26, line 29). The polymer contains at least 50 mole % or more of monomer (11), and in a particular embodiment, the polymer is a homopolymer containing 100 % of monomer (11) (col. 22, line 5). A resulting homopolymer has a weight average molecular weight of 40.0 × 104 or more and a number average molecular weight of 8.0 × 104 or more (col. 22, line 21 and 27). The amount of polymer in the crude reaction mixture is 2.0 % by mass or more (col. 28, line 27). In a subsequent step, the homopolymer may be subjected to ultrafiltration, microfiltration, or dialysis membrane treatment to remove unreacted monomer, dimer and trimer (col. 27, lines 22-30). Claims 19 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Nanba et al. (US 12,503,527). The discussion of the disclosure of the prior art from the preceding paragraph is incorporated here by reference. In a further aspect of the invention, a fluoromonomer in aqueous medium is polymerized in the presence of the polymer derived from perfluoroallyl ether monomer (11). The resulting aqueous dispersion has a variety of uses. In one embodiment, the aqueous dispersion is mixed with organic or inorganic filler to form a composition to coat a metal or ceramic substrate to give the substrate non-stickiness, a low coefficient of friction, and abrasion resistance (col. 70, lines 40-45). One of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to make a coating composition using the composition disclosed in the prior art. Claims 1, 3-7, and 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Yamanaka et al. (WO 2021/100835). Yamanaka et al. (WO 2021/100835) is the international counterpart of Yamanaka et al. (US 12,492,271). The discussion of the disclosure of the prior art from preceding paragraph 4 is incorporated here by reference. Applicant cannot rely upon the certified copy of the foreign priority application to overcome this rejection because a translation of said application has not been made of record in accordance with 37 CFR 1.55. When an English language translation of a non-English language foreign application is required, the translation must be that of the certified copy (of the foreign application as filed) submitted together with a statement that the translation of the certified copy is accurate. See MPEP §§ 215 and 216. Claims 1-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Nanba et al. (WO 2021/100836). Nanba et al. (WO 2021/100836) is the international counterpart of Nanba et al. (US 12,503,527). The discussion of the disclosure of the prior art from preceding paragraph 5 is incorporated here by reference. Applicant cannot rely upon the certified copy of the foreign priority application to overcome this rejection because a translation of said application has not been made of record in accordance with 37 CFR 1.55. When an English language translation of a non-English language foreign application is required, the translation must be that of the certified copy (of the foreign application as filed) submitted together with a statement that the translation of the certified copy is accurate. See MPEP §§ 215 and 216. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Rip A. Lee whose telephone number is (571)272-1104. The examiner can be reached on Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Jones, can be reached at (571)270-7733. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is (571)273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RIP A LEE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1762 January 29, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 18, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600807
POLYPROPYLENE FILM WITH IMPROVED SLIP PERFORMANCE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600805
FLUORINE-CONTAINING ALKYL AMMONIUM BORATE COMPOUND AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595322
GAS-PHASE BIPHENYLPHENOL POLYMERIZATION CATALYSTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594538
CONTINUOUS PROCESSOR UTILIZING QUANTUM FIELD MICRO-VARIABLE PARTICLE INTERACTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590245
LONG-PERSISTENT LUMINESCENCE EMITTER AND LONG-PERSISTENT LUMINESCENT DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (-4.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1345 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month