Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/321,612

SUPPORT MEMBER FOR DISPLAY DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 22, 2023
Examiner
BURTNER, DOUGLAS R
Art Unit
2841
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
294 granted / 411 resolved
+3.5% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
434
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
47.5%
+7.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 411 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I, Figs 1-13, Claims 1-8, 10, 14-20 in the reply filed on 10/8/2025 is acknowledged. Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority based on an application filed in Korea on 7/8/2022. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-8, 10, 14-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Zhou (CN111862824A using US 20230176621 A1 as a translation, hereinafter Zhou) Claim 1. Zhou teaches a support member for a display device, comprising: a first surface (outer surface of 2, fig 1) and a second surface (inner surface of 2, fig 1) opposite to each other (fig 1); an outer pattern (patterns in 2, fig 3) at the first surface, and extending longer in a first direction (direction of A, figs 3); and an inner pattern (patterns in 2, fig 3) at the second surface, and extending longer in the first direction (direction of A, figs 3), wherein the outer pattern and the inner pattern are staggered with each other (since A and B are different sizes, comparing figs 3A, 3B, also [0061] recites ‘the strip-shaped hollowed-out parts 20 of the respective supporting layers 2 have the same width C and different lengths A. The hollowed-out parts corresponding to each other in the respective supporting layers 2 have two borders aligned in the width C direction. Midpoints of the hollowed-out parts corresponding to each other in the respective supporting layers 2 are aligned in the length A direction. Of course, both the lengths A and widths C of the strip-shaped hollowed-out parts 20 of the respective supporting layers 2 may also be different’). Claim 2. Zhou teaches the support member of claim 1, wherein: the support member comprises a first area (top left area of fig 1), a second area (top right area of fig 1), and a third area (middle area) between the first area and the second area in a plan view (figs 1, 4); the support member is configured to be folded along a folding axis parallel to the first direction in the third area (fig 1); and the outer pattern and the inner pattern are located in the third area (fig 1). Claim 3. Zhou teaches the support member claim 2, wherein in a state in which the support member is folded, the first surface faces toward the outside, and the second surface faces toward the inside (fig 1). Claim 4. Zhou teaches the support member of claim 2, wherein: the outer pattern has a shape of a groove ([0061] recites ‘strip-shaped hollowed-out part’) recessed from the first surface of the support member; the inner pattern has a shape of a groove ([0061] recites ‘strip-shaped hollowed-out part’) recessed from the second surface of the support member; and a hole penetrating the support member is located in a portion in which the outer pattern and the inner pattern overlap with each other ([0061] recites ‘Midpoints of the hollowed-out parts corresponding to each other in the respective supporting layers 2 are aligned in the length A direction’). Claim 5. Zhou teaches the support member of claim 2, wherein the outer pattern and the inner pattern have a bar shape or a rhombus shape in a plan view (figs 3). Claim 6. Zhou teaches the support member of claim 2, wherein: the outer pattern comprises a plurality of outer patterns (figs 3) adjacent to one another along the first direction, and a second direction crossing the first direction (figs 3) ; and the inner pattern comprises a plurality of inner patterns (figs 3) adjacent to one another along the first direction and the second direction (figs 3). Claim 7. Zhou teaches the support member of claim 6, further comprising: an outer bridge (portions of element 2 that are not hollowed-out) between the plurality of the outer patterns; and an inner bridge (portions of element 2 that are not hollowed-out) between the plurality of the inner patterns (figs 3). Claim 8. Zhou teaches the support member of claim 7, wherein the outer bridge and the inner bridge are located in a zigzag shape (since lengths A are different between the two surfaces, but symmetrical). Claim 14. Zhou teaches a display device comprising: a display panel (3, fig 1) configured to display an image; and a support member (both layers of 2, fig 1) on one surface (outer surface) of the display panel, wherein the support member comprises: a first surface (outer surface of 2, fig 1) and a second surface (inner surface of 2, fig 1) opposite to each other (fig 1); an outer pattern (patterns in 2, fig 3) at the first surface, and extending longer in a first direction (direction of A, figs 3); and an inner pattern (patterns in 2, fig 3) at the second surface, and extending longer in the first direction (direction of A, figs 3), and wherein the outer pattern and the inner pattern are staggered with each other (since A and B are different sizes, comparing figs 3A, 3B, also [0061] recites ‘the strip-shaped hollowed-out parts 20 of the respective supporting layers 2 have the same width C and different lengths A. The hollowed-out parts corresponding to each other in the respective supporting layers 2 have two borders aligned in the width C direction. Midpoints of the hollowed-out parts corresponding to each other in the respective supporting layers 2 are aligned in the length A direction. Of course, both the lengths A and widths C of the strip-shaped hollowed-out parts 20 of the respective supporting layers 2 may also be different’). Claim 15. Zhou teaches the display device of claim 14, wherein: the support member comprises a first area (top left area of fig 1), a second area (top right area of fig 1), and a third area (middle area) between the first area and the second area in a plan view (figs 1, 4); the support member is configured to be folded along a folding axis parallel to the first direction in the third area (fig 1); and the outer pattern and the inner pattern are located in the third area (fig 1). Claim 16. Zhou teaches the display device of claim 15, wherein in a state in which the support member is folded, the first surface faces toward the outside, and the second surface faces toward the inside (fig 1). Claim 17. Zhou teaches the display device of claim 15, wherein: the outer pattern has a shape of a groove ([0061] recites ‘strip-shaped hollowed-out part’) recessed from the first surface of the support member; the inner pattern has a shape of a groove ([0061] recites ‘strip-shaped hollowed-out part’) recessed from the second surface of the support member; and a hole penetrating the support member is located in a portion in which the outer pattern and the inner pattern overlap with each other ([0061] recites ‘Midpoints of the hollowed-out parts corresponding to each other in the respective supporting layers 2 are aligned in the length A direction’). Claim 18. Zhou teaches the display device of claim 15, wherein the outer pattern and the inner pattern have a bar shape or a rhombus shape in a plan view (figs 3). Claim 19. Zhou teaches the display device of claim 15, wherein: the outer pattern comprises a plurality of outer patterns adjacent to one another along the first direction, and a second direction crossing the first direction (figs 3); and the inner pattern comprises a plurality of inner patterns adjacent to one another along the first direction and the second direction (figs 3). Claim 20. Zhou teaches the display device of claim 19, wherein the support member comprises: an outer bridge (portions of element 2 that are not hollowed-out) between the plurality of outer patterns; and an inner bridge (portions of element 2 that are not hollowed-out) between the plurality of inner patterns, and wherein the outer bridge and the inner bridge are located in a zigzag shape (since lengths A are different between the two surfaces, but symmetrical), or along a line (since lengths A can be the same). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 10 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter for claim 10: The closest prior art (which has been made of record) fail to disclose (by themselves or in combination) a ratio of a depth of the outer pattern to a thickness of the support member is 60 % or more, and 70 % or less; and a ratio of a depth of the inner pattern to the thickness of the support member is 30 % or more, and 40 % or less in combination with the additionally claimed features, as are claimed by the Applicant. Thus, the Applicant’s claims are determined to be novel and non-obvious. Zhou [0063] recites ‘the supporting layer 2 close to the outer side of bending or folding has a larger tensile deformation and has a higher requirement on the tensile performance, while the supporting layer 2 close to the inner side of bending or folding has a lower requirement on the tensile performance. In an implementation of the present application, the supporting layer 2 close to the outer side of bending or folding has a relatively larger area of the hollowed-out part(s) 20, while the supporting layer 2 close to the inner side of bending or folding has a relatively smaller area of the hollowed-out part(s) 20, so that the bending performance of the supporting layers 2 can not only be improved, but also the good support can be provided for the flexible display module 3 when the screen is unfolded’, however Zhou fails to specifically teach the ratio of depths as claimed Liao (US 20220103670 A1) [0103] recites ‘Optionally, a proportion of the depth d of the gap 3 to the thickness of the support sheet 2 ranges from 77/80 to 97/100. For example, the thickness of the support sheet 2 is 0.08 mm, and the depth d of the gap 3 is 0.077 mm. For another example, the thickness of the support sheet 2 is 0.10 mm, and the depth d of the gap 3 is 0.097 mm’, however Liao fails to specifically teach two different ratios on two different sides. Also, neither of the two ratios fall within the claimed ranges. Park (US 10694625 B2) col 13 lines 63-67 recites ‘When the openings 202 of FIG. 9E or 9F are formed to have a depth or length equal to the partial thickness P1, the thickness P1 needs to be greater than ½ of the thickness of the body 200a, which may be desirable in terms of stretching and contraction of the openings 202’ Wang (US 12093081 B2) claim 7 recites ‘a maximum thickness of the second support plate is H.sub.3, and a depth of each of the plurality of the blind hole is H.sub.4, and a value range of a ratio of the H.sub.4 to the H.sub.3 is between 0.4 and 0.5’, however Wang still fails to teach a ratio of a depth of a pattern on the other side between 60%-70%. Xiong (US 11947396 B2) col 4 lines 41-44 recite ‘In some embodiments, the ratio of the depth of each of the blind holes 5 to the thickness of the support assembly 10 is in a range of ⅓ to ⅔, in order to further enhance the bending performance of the bending region.’ This matches half of claim 10, but Xiong still fails to teach a ratio of a depth of a pattern on the other side is in the opposite side of a range of ⅓ to ⅔. It might seem obvious to have a ratio of a depth of a pattern on the other side to be the same as on the first side, however claim 10 requires a different (and specific) ratio on one side from the other side. Wang (US 20240081003 A1) [0128] recites ‘Furthermore, ratios of the depths of the plurality of groove structures 130 to a thickness of the supporting plate are less than or equal to 0.6’, see also fig 5. Wang has a similar situation with Xiong. Wang (US 20250093908 A1) [0112] recites ‘In some embodiments, a ratio of the hole depth of the third hole group 700 to the thickness of the support plate 300 ranges from ½ to ⅔. Too large or too small ratio may lead to the imbalance between stress release performance and support rigidity, affect the performance parameters of the support plate 300, and lead to obvious creases’ and has a similar situation with Xiong. Lin (US 20180209029 A1) fig 6, [0099] indicate a depth of groove 40%-60%, but fails to teach the remaining limitations similarly to Xiong, Wang (US 20240045471 A1) have a similar situation. Xiao (US 20240389429 A1) [0083] recites ‘Referring to FIGS. 3D and 4D, for example, in the direction from the inside to the outside with the first region G1 as the center, a ratio of the depth t3 of the first groove 22 to the thickness T of the support backplane, a ratio of the depth t2 of the second groove 22 to the thickness T of the support backplane, and a ratio of the depth t1 of the third groove 22 to the thickness T of the support backplane are 0.9, 0.7 and 0.5, respectively. That is, the depths of the plurality of grooves 22 in the first direction X are sequentially reduced from the inside to the outside.’ Examiner Notes Examiner cites particular elements, columns and line numbers in the references as applied to the claims above for the convenience of the applicant. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim, other passages and figures may apply as well. It is respectfully requested that, in preparing responses, the applicant fully consider the references in their entirety as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention, as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DOUGLAS R BURTNER whose telephone number is (571)272-0966. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jinhee Lee can be reached on (571) 272-1977. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DOUGLAS R BURTNER/ Examiner, Art Unit 2841 /ROCKSHANA D CHOWDHURY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 22, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588156
FOLDABLE DISPLAY APPARATUS INCLUDING A HINGE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12575044
FOLDABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING NON-CONDUCTIVE MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12560985
SOLID STATE DRIVE TO AVOID ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE BY CHANGING THE LENGTH OF BOTTOM PLANE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12510928
FOLDABLE DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12507360
ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH HINGE ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+18.6%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 411 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month