Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/324,198

WORKING SYSTEM FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PACKAGING PROCESS AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §103§DP
Filed
May 26, 2023
Examiner
MCCLAIN, GERALD
Art Unit
3652
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Siliconware Precision Industries Co. Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
575 granted / 773 resolved
+22.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
815
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
34.7%
-5.3% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 773 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . There were no claim amendments filed on 26 December 2025 Claim Interpretation The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. This application includes one or more claim limitations that do not use the word “means,” but are nonetheless being interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, sixth paragraph, because the claim limitation(s) uses a generic placeholder that is coupled with functional language without reciting sufficient structure to perform the recited function and the generic placeholder is not preceded by a structural modifier. Such claim limitation(s) is/are: pick-and-place device, magazine, return device (Claims 1-9, 11-19), input device (Claims 1,6-9,11,16-19), output device (Claims 1-5,11-15), first/second distributor (Claims 3-5,7-9,13-15,17-19). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claim(s) 1-9 and 11-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hsieh et al (US 10910249; FIG. 2A below) (“Hsieh”) in view of Iwasaki et al. (US 6050768) (“Iwasaki”). Hsieh discloses: PNG media_image1.png 678 1046 media_image1.png Greyscale Claim 1: an input device connected to the process starting end an output device connected to the process ending end (at least 224B1 has processing, wherein the one port is input and the other port is output for FOUP/pods/AMHS/OHT/etc.) a return device connected to the input device and the output device and configured to transport the at least one pick-and-place device disposed on at least one of the input device and the output device, wherein the pick-and-place device is used to input a magazine carrying a target material to the input device and/or output the magazine carrying the Claim 2: wherein the pick-and-place device is disposed on the input device, and the input device has at least one load port, such that the pick-and-place device moves the magazine from outside to the load port; Claim 3: wherein the input device further has at least one first distributor that is used to distribute the target material in the magazine Claim 4: wherein the input device further has at least one first operation area connected to the load port, and the magazine is moved to the first operation area via the load port, such that the target material in the magazine in the first operation area is processed by the first distributor; Claim 5: wherein the input device has a first temporary storage port connected to the first operation area and the load port; Claim 6: wherein the pick-and-place device is disposed on the output device, and the output device has at least one unload port, such that the pick-and-place device outputs the magazine in the output device to outside via the unload port; Claim 7: wherein the output device further has at least one second distributor that is used to distribute the target material into the magazine Claim 8: wherein the output device further has at least one second operation area connected to the unload port for placing the magazine, wherein the second distributor processes the target material into the magazine in the second operation area, and the magazine is moved to the unload port via the second operation area; Claim 9: wherein the output device has a second temporary storage port connected to the second operation area and the unload port; Claim 10: a return device connected to the input device and the output device to transport the magazine from the input device to the output device; Claim 11: providing the working system of claim 1; picking and placing the magazine from an automatic handling system into the input device via the pick-and-place device; transferring the target material in the magazine moving the processed target material to the output device via the output device; loading the processed target material into the magazine in the output device via the output device; moving the magazine with the processed target material in the output device to the automatic handling system via the pick-and-place device (FIG. 2A; column 7, line 52 to column 9, line 3; multiple 226/230 for pick-and-place for processing; FIG. 4-5); Claim 12: wherein the pick-and-place device is disposed on the input device, and the input device has at least one load port, such that the pick-and-place device moves the magazine from the automatic handling system to the input device via the load port; Claim 13: wherein the input device further has at least one first distributor that transfers the target material in the magazine Claim 14: wherein the input device further has at least one first operation area, and the magazine is moved to the first operation area via the load port, such that the target material in the magazine in the first operation area is processed by the first distributor; Claim 15: wherein the input device has a first temporary storage port connected to the first operation area and the load port, and the magazine on the load port is moved to the first temporary storage port; Claim 16: wherein the pick-and-place device is disposed on the output device, and the output device has at least one unload port, such that the pick-and-place device outputs the magazine with the processed target material to the automatic handling system via the unload port; Claim 17: wherein the output device further has at least one second distributor that moves the processed target material to the output device; Claim 18: wherein the output device further has at least one second operation area connected to the unload port for placing the magazine, wherein the second distributor loads the processed target material into the magazine in the second operation area, and the magazine is moved to the unload port via the second operation area; Claim 19: wherein the output device has a second temporary storage port connected to the second operation area and the unload port, and the magazine of the output device waiting to load the processed target material is temporarily stored in the second temporary storage port. Hsieh does not directly show: Claim 1: a track structure defined with a process starting end and a process ending end; an input device connected to the process starting end of the track structure; an output device connected to the process ending end of the track structure; an input device configured to transfer a target material in a magazine to the track structure to empty the magazine and process the target material; an output device configured to load the processed target material into the empty magazine in the output device; a return device configured to transport the empty magazine from the input device to the output device; Claim 3: the magazine and corresponds to the track structure; Claim 7: the magazine and corresponds to the track structure; processed target material; empty magazine; Claim 8: processed target material; empty magazine; Claim 11: the magazine to the track structure; empty the magazine; transporting the empty magazine from the input device to the output device via the return device; Claim 13: the magazine to the track structure; Claim 18: empty magazine. Iwasaki shows a similar device having: Claim 1: a track structure defined with a process starting end and a process ending end; an input device connected to the process starting end of the track structure; an output device connected to the process ending end of the track structure; Claim 3: the magazine and corresponds to the track structure; Claim 7: the magazine and corresponds to the track structure; Claim 11: the magazine to the track structure; Claim 13: the magazine to the track structure; (column 13, lines 47-49, “… a track-type robot may be used instead.”) with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of allowing the at least one pick-and-place device to automatically move along the track structure to reduce directional/navigational programming needs over the long-term due to the path parameters of the at least one pick-and-place device being pre-defined along the track structure. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Hsieh as taught by Iwasaki and include Iwasaki’s similar device having: Claim 1: a track structure defined with a process starting end and a process ending end; an input device connected to the process starting end of the track structure; an output device connected to the process ending end of the track structure; Claim 3: the magazine and corresponds to the track structure; Claim 7: the magazine and corresponds to the track structure; Claim 11: the magazine to the track structure; Claim 13: the magazine to the track structure; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of allowing the at least one pick-and-place device to automatically move along the track structure to reduce directional/navigational programming needs over the long-term due to the path parameters of the at least one pick-and-place device being pre-defined along the track structure. Hsieh suggests a similar device having: Claim 1: an input device configured to transfer a target material in a magazine to the track structure to empty the magazine and process the target material; an output device configured to load the processed target material into the empty magazine in the output device; a return device configured to transport the empty magazine from the input device to the output device; Claim 7: processed target material; empty magazine; Claim 8: processed target material; empty magazine; Claim 11: empty the magazine; transporting the empty magazine from the input device to the output device via the return device; Claim 18: empty magazine; (for the above claims, in at least column 13, lines 26-38 and column 10, line 60 to column 11, line 4, Hsieh suggests that “wafer data” is used to direct materials and magazines using communication among the autonomous devices to various locations as claimed; at least “(e.g., once the autonomous cart is full and ready for transport)” suggests that a device may be full, partially full, or not full (empty); wafer data is used throughout Hsieh which suggests that all structures and materials are directed and handled thereto); with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of reducing the probability of human failure within the apparatus due to failure in human knowledge (forgetting/false knowledge) that may cause apparatus damage and/or damage to material that is transported (column 1, lines 51-58). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Hsieh as taught by Hsieh and include Hsieh’s similar device having: Claim 1: an input device configured to transfer a target material in a magazine to the track structure to empty the magazine and process the target material; an output device configured to load the processed target material into the empty magazine in the output device; a return device configured to transport the empty magazine from the input device to the output device; Claim 7: processed target material; empty magazine; Claim 8: processed target material; empty magazine; Claim 11: empty the magazine; transporting the empty magazine from the input device to the output device via the return device; Claim 18: empty magazine; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of reducing the probability of human failure within the apparatus due to failure in human knowledge (forgetting/false knowledge) that may cause apparatus damage and/or damage to material that is transported. Double Patenting Claim 1 is provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim 14 of copending Application No. 18/323,741 (reference application; PGPUB 2024/0266197) in view of Iwasaki. The reference application discloses the claim limitations below. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection. Current Application USSN 18/323,741 1. A working system for a semiconductor packaging process, comprising: 1. A working system for a semiconductor packaging process, comprising: a process path connecting the process starting end and a process ending end a process path connected to the process starting end and the process ending end; an input device connected to the process starting end including an input device connected to the process starting end of the machine equipment and an output device connected to the process ending end, an output device connected to the process ending end of the machine equipment, at least one pick-and-place device disposed on at least one of the input device and the output device, … to the input device and/or output the magazine carrying the target material from the output device (Claim 14: picking and placing the magazine from an automatic handling system into the input device …) a return device connected to the input device and the output device and configured to transport the a return device connected to the input device and the output device to transport the magazine from the input device to the output device. The reference application does not directly show: Claim 1: a track structure defined with a process starting end and a process ending end; an input device connected to the process starting end of the track structure; an output device connected to the process ending end of the track structure; an input device configured to transfer a target material in a magazine to the track structure to empty the magazine and process the target material; an output device configured to load the processed target material into the empty magazine in the output device; a return device configured to transport the empty magazine from the input device to the output device. Iwasaki shows a similar device having: Claim 1: a track structure defined with a process starting end and a process ending end; an input device connected to the process starting end of the track structure; an output device connected to the process ending end of the track structure; (column 13, lines 47-49, “… a track-type robot may be used instead.”) with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of allowing the at least one pick-and-place device to automatically move along the track structure to reduce directional/navigational programming needs over the long-term due to the path parameters of the at least one pick-and-place device being pre-defined along the track structure. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the reference application as taught by Iwasaki and include Iwasaki’s similar device having: Claim 1: a track structure defined with a process starting end and a process ending end; an input device connected to the process starting end of the track structure; an output device connected to the process ending end of the track structure; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of allowing the at least one pick-and-place device to automatically move along the track structure to reduce directional/navigational programming needs over the long-term due to the path parameters of the at least one pick-and-place device being pre-defined along the track structure. Hsieh suggests a similar device having: Claim 1: an input device configured to transfer a target material in a magazine to the track structure to empty the magazine and process the target material; an output device configured to load the processed target material into the empty magazine in the output device; a return device configured to transport the empty magazine from the input device to the output device; (in at least column 13, lines 26-38 and column 10, line 60 to column 11, line 4, Hsieh suggests that “wafer data” is used to direct materials and magazines using communication among the autonomous devices to various locations as claimed; at least “(e.g., once the autonomous cart is full and ready for transport)” suggests that a device may be full, partially full, or not full (empty); wafer data is used throughout Hsieh which suggests that all structures and materials are directed and handled thereto); with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of reducing the probability of human failure due to failure in human knowledge (forgetting/false knowledge) that may cause apparatus damage and/or damage to material that is transported (column 1, lines 51-58). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Hsieh as taught by Hsieh and include Hsieh’s similar device having: Claim 1: an input device configured to transfer a target material in a magazine to the track structure to empty the magazine and process the target material; an output device configured to load the processed target material into the empty magazine in the output device; a return device configured to transport the empty magazine from the input device to the output device; with a reasonable expectation of success for the purpose of reducing the probability of human failure due to failure in human knowledge (forgetting/false knowledge) that may cause apparatus damage and/or damage to material that is transported. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 26 December 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues the following. However, assuming arguendo that Hsieh discloses such a return device, it would necessarily require the mobile robotic arms 226A, 226B, 226C, 230 to transport a magazine from the input port of wafer store/processing tool 224B 1 to the output port of the same wafer store/processing tool 224B 1. Hsieh does not disclose such functionality. As described in column 10, lines 4-16 of the specification of Hsieh, FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate that the first and second locations each have a wafer store/processing tool and a mobile robotic arm. The mobile robotic arm is used to transfer wafers and/or magazines from the wafer store/processing tool at the first location to an autonomous cart at the first location. Then, the autonomous cart transports the wafers and/or magazines to the second location, where another mobile robotic arm transfers the wafers and/or magazines from the autonomous cart to another wafer store/processing tool disposed at the second location. Thus, the mobile robotic arms of Hsieh only move wafers/magazines between wafer stores and autonomous carts, not from the input port of one wafer store/processing tool to the output port of the same wafer store/processing tool. Therefore, Hsieh fails to disclose at least the distinguishing limitation "a return device connected to the input device and the output device and configured to transport the empty magazine from the input device to the output device," as recited in independent claim 1 of the present application. (original emphasis) Applicant did not specifically address the rejections above re. “in at least column 13, lines 26-38 and column 10, line 60 to column 11, line 4, Hsieh suggests that ‘wafer data’ is used to direct materials and magazines using communication among the autonomous devices to various locations as claimed; at least ‘(e.g., once the autonomous cart is full and ready for transport)’ suggests that a device may be full, partially full, or not full (empty); wafer data is used throughout Hsieh which suggests that all structures and materials are directed and handled thereto.” At least the disclosure of Hsieh suggests (TSM) the claim limitation “a return device connected to the input device and the output device and configured to transport the empty magazine from the input device to the output device.” Also see FIG. 2A, column 7, line 52 to column 9, line 3, and multiple 226/230 for pick-and-place for processing; FIG. 4-5 discloses/are shown to anticipate the structures above; Multiple structures in FIG. 2A/2B disclose structures claimed above that meet the functions claimed thereto per the 102 rejections above re. the return device. Re. Iwasaki, Iwasaki was not used for the return device limitations, only track structure limitations. The double patenting rejections have been maintained per the reasons stated above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Gerald McClain whose telephone number is (571)272-7803. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and at gerald.mcclain@uspto.gov (see MPEP 502.03 (II)). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Saul Rodriguez can be reached at (571) 272-7097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Gerald McClain/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3652
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Jul 01, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 15, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Oct 16, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §DP
Oct 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 29, 2026
Final Rejection — §103, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12583691
INDUSTRIAL ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12583019
SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE TRANSPORTING METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12564970
TRANSFER APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12559325
TRANSFER ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552051
OBJECT CONVEYING ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 773 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month