Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/325,739

SEMICONDUCTOR PHOTONICS DEVICE AND METHODS OF FORMATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 30, 2023
Examiner
SMITH, CHAD
Art Unit
2874
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
711 granted / 903 resolved
+10.7% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
934
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
44.4%
+4.4% vs TC avg
§102
42.0%
+2.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 903 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of claims 1 – 6 and 16 – 20 in the reply filed on 11/25/25 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 6 and 16 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sun et al. (U.S. PG Pub. # 2016/0313577 A1). In Re claims 1 – 3 and 5, ‘577 teaches a semiconductor device, comprising: a dielectric layer (110 and 40, both of which are silicon oxide, pars. 0026, 0028); and an optical modulator structure, in the dielectric layer, comprising: a first region including a first dopant type (as annotated below, N-type); and a second region, on a top surface of the first region, including a second dopant type (as annotated below, P-type), wherein the first region and the second region correspond to a P-N junction diode of the optical modulator structure; a third region, adjacent with a side of the first region, including the second dopant type (as annotated below, P-type as its connected to 121), wherein the first region, the second region, and the third region correspond to the P-N junction diode of the optical modulator structure; a fourth region, connecting the second region and the third region, including the second dopant type (as annotated below, P-type as its connected to 121). In Re claim 6, ‘577 teaches a ring resonator which can be measured in microns thus a micro ring resonator (par. 0030). [AltContent: arrow] 2nd region [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image1.png 260 618 media_image1.png Greyscale 1st region 4th region 3rd region In Re claims 1 – 4, ‘577 teaches a semiconductor device, comprising: a dielectric layer (110 and 40, both of which are silicon oxide, pars. 0026, 0028); and an optical modulator structure, in the dielectric layer, comprising: a first region including a first dopant type (as annotated below, P-type); and a second region, on a top surface of the first region, including a second dopant type (as annotated below, N-type), wherein the first region and the second region correspond to a P-N junction diode of the optical modulator structure. [AltContent: arrow] 2nd region [AltContent: arrow] 1st region [AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image1.png 260 618 media_image1.png Greyscale In Re claim 16, ‘577 teaches a semiconductor device, comprising: a dielectric layer (110 and 40, both of which are silicon oxide, pars. 0026, 0028); and an optical modulator structure, in the dielectric layer, comprising: a first portion of a P-N junction diode of the optical modulator structure, wherein the first portion includes a first dopant type (annotated part of 120, N-type); and a second portion of the P-N junction diode, wherein the second portion includes a second dopant type (annotated part of 121, P-type), and wherein the second portion comprises: a first segment on a top surface of the first portion; a second segment on a side surface of the first portion; and a third segment connecting the first segment and the second segment. [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] 2nd portion 1st segment 3rd segment [AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] PNG media_image1.png 260 618 media_image1.png Greyscale 1st portion 2nd segment In Re claim 17, as seen above, an L-shaped interface is formed between the first and second portions. Alternatively, In Re claim 16, ‘577 teaches a semiconductor device, comprising: a dielectric layer (110 and 40, both of which are silicon oxide, pars. 0026, 0028); and an optical modulator structure, in the dielectric layer, comprising: a first portion of a P-N junction diode of the optical modulator structure, wherein the first portion includes a first dopant type (annotated part of 121, P-type); and a second portion of the P-N junction diode, wherein the second portion includes a second dopant type (annotated part of 120, N-type), and wherein the second portion comprises: a first segment on a top surface of the first portion; a second segment on a side surface of the first portion; and a third segment connecting the first segment and the second segment (as annotated below). [AltContent: arrow] 3rd segment [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] 1st portion 1st segment [AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image1.png 260 618 media_image1.png Greyscale 2nd portion 2nd segment In Re claim 18, ‘577 teaches wherein a thickness (interpreted as measured horizontally) of the first portion is greater relative to a thickness (interpreted as measured horizontally) of the first segment (annotated box of 122 of 120) of the second portion. In Re claim 20, ‘577 teaches wherein a carrier concentration (N – type) in the first segment of the second portion is greater relative to a carrier concentration (P-type) in the first portion (N – type has more N dopant that that of the first portion which is P-type). In Re claim 19, ‘577 teaches wherein a dopant concentration of the second dopant type in the third segment is greater relative to a dopant concentration of the second dopant type in the first segment; and wherein the dopant concentration of the second dopant type in the third segment is greater relative to a dopant concentration of the second dopant type in the second segment (since the annotated 3rd segment is larger than the annotated 1st and 2nd segments, the dopant concentration is greater in the 3rd segment than the other two segments). [AltContent: arrow] 3rd segment [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] 1st portion 1st segment [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: arrow][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image1.png 260 618 media_image1.png Greyscale 2nd portion 2nd segment In Re claim 21, ‘577 teaches a semiconductor device, comprising: a dielectric layer (110 and 40, both of which are silicon oxide, pars. 0026, 0028); and an optical modulator structure, in the dielectric layer, comprising: a first portion of a P-N junction diode of the optical modulator structure, wherein the first portion includes a first dopant type; a second portion of the P-N junction diode, wherein the second portion includes a second dopant type; and an L-shaped interface between the first portion and the second portion. Claims 21 – 28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Cho et al. (U.S. PG Pub. # 2021/0063777 A1). In Re claim 21, ‘777 teaches a semiconductor device, comprising: a dielectric layer (200 and 700, silicon oxide, par. 0018); and an optical modulator structure, in the dielectric layer, comprising: a first portion (560, OCR2) of a P-N junction diode (par. 0035) of the optical modulator structure, wherein the first portion includes a first dopant type (par. 0035); a second portion (530, OCR1) of the P-N junction diode, wherein the second portion includes a second dopant type (par. 0035); and an L-shaped interface (as seen in fig. 10) between the first portion and the second portion. In Re claim 22, ‘777 teaches wherein the second portion comprises: a first segment on a top surface of the first portion; a second segment on a side surface of the first portion; and a third segment on a top surface of the second segment, and on a side surface of the first segment (as annotated below). [AltContent: arrow]2nd segment 3rd segment 1st segment [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image2.png 254 246 media_image2.png Greyscale In Re claim 28, ‘777 teaches wherein the L-shaped interface comprises an approximately vertical segment in which the first portion and the second portion are coupled, and an approximately horizontal segment in which the first portion and the second portion are coupled (as seen in annotated fig. 10 above). In Re claim 23, ‘777 teaches wherein a thickness of the first portion (sliver of blacked out area) is greater relative to a thickness of the first segment of the second portion (as annotated below as the dimensions have not been claimed so any arbitrarily defined dimensions meets the claimed limitation). [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow]2nd segment 3rd segment 1st segment [AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image2.png 254 246 media_image2.png Greyscale In Re claim 24, ‘777 teaches wherein a dopant concentration of the second dopant type in the third segment is greater relative to a dopant concentration of the second dopant type in the first segment (third segment is much larger thus a higher dopant concentration), and wherein the dopant concentration of the second dopant type in the third segment is greater relative to a dopant concentration of the second dopant type in the second segment (third segment, black box, is much larger thus a higher dopant concentration as the boundaries of the regions has not been defined with dimensions). In Re claim 25, ‘777 teaches wherein a carrier concentration in the first segment (p-type) of the second portion is greater relative to a carrier concentration in the first portion (n type) (since first segment is just p type and first portion is n type, there is more p-type in the first segment than in the first portion). In Re claims 26 and 27, ‘777 teaches wherein part of the first portion extends (to the right) beyond a side surface of first segment (as seen below); wherein part of the second segment (black box) extends (to the left) beyond a side surface of the third segment (as annotated below). [AltContent: arrow][AltContent: arrow]2nd segment 3rd segment 1st segment [AltContent: arrow] [AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect][AltContent: rect] PNG media_image2.png 254 246 media_image2.png Greyscale Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHAD SMITH whose telephone number is (571)270-1294. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 - 5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Uyen-Chau Le can be reached at 1-571-272-2397. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHAD H SMITH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2874
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601951
BEAM-STEERING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SPATIAL STEERING OF A LIGHT BEAM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596220
LIGHT GUIDE PLATE, LIGHT GUIDE PLATE UNIT, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12591152
OPTICAL MODULATOR AND OPTICAL TRANSMISSION DEVICE USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12591163
ELECTRO-OPTIC MODULATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12578529
OPTICAL TRANSMITTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+20.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 903 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month